I was the first chairman of the World United Formosans for Independence (WUFI, 台灣獨立建國聯盟). Eighteen years ago, when I returned to Taiwan from the US, the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) chairman at that time, Huang Hsin-chieh (黃信介) told me that Taiwanese independence was something that had to be achieved but not something that we could talk about loudly.
A lot of water has passed under the bridge since then, but now President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) has said that unification is something that must be carried out but that cannot be talked about loudly.
On July 12 in an interview with Germany’s Suddeutsche Zeitung newspaper, Ma said that Taiwan is not interested in obtaining formal independence from China, but will not take part in unification talks with Beijing.
Ma has pledged to keep to his policy of maintaining the status quo across the Taiwan Strait.
Judging from what he is saying, Ma is not pursuing unification with China. Looking at his actions, however, it is easy to see that he is actively promoting it.
PRESSURE
In terms of Taiwan’s sovereignty, Ma has backed down in the face of pressure from China on numerous occasions, including on the so-called “1992 consensus” that there is “one China, with each side having its own interpretation.”
Because Ma states that “one China” refers to the Republic of China, it will be very difficult for his claims to be internationally accepted, and since the “one China with each side having its own interpretation” is not going down well, Ma has in effect been forced to accept China’s “one China” principle.
In addition, Minister of Foreign Affairs Francisco Ou (歐鴻鍊) has said that in the future, Taiwan will use the name “Chinese Taipei” when applying for membership at international organizations such as the WHO.
These moves are aimed at pushing Taiwan into unification with the People’s Republic of China.
THREATS
Apart from all of these threats, since taking office Ma has been insisting on the opening of direct chartered cross-strait flights while showing precious little regard for national security.
Waiving the restrictions on Taiwanese businesses establishing 12-inch wafer plants in China is tantamount to undermining the foundations of Taiwan’s largest and most important industry.
Ma has also greatly relaxed restrictions on China-bound capital investments and encouraged Taiwanese businesses to increase their investments in China.
BLUNDERS
The way in which Ma has been leaning toward China since coming into office has worried both the US and Japan. Talk of permanently canceling sales of US military equipment to Taiwan, and Premier Liu Chao-shiuan’s (劉兆玄) comments about not ruling out going to war with Japan over the Diaoyutai islands are serious diplomatic blunders that have put Taiwan in a dangerous situation internationally.
Ma is apt at saying one thing and doing another. The Taiwanese public should not fall for his tricks and they should pay close attention to what he says and does.
We must stay united and carefully monitor what is going on within Ma’s government. We must protest against anything that is not beneficial to Taiwan.
We cannot let Ma get away with his attempts to achieve unification.
Chai Trong-rong is a DPP legislator.
TRANSLATED BY DREW CAMERON
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS