Schools from hell
I am writing further to the article “Schools still ignore law on corporal punishment: poll,” (July 7, page 2).
That is only half the truth. If a Taiwanese student is really unlucky, he has to study at a private school. He has to get up at 6:30am to arrive at school at 7:30am to study until 8:30pm. Of course, he is “lazy” (he has only been in school for 12 to 14 hours after all) therefore he has to do some homework, sometimes two to three hours’ worth per day.
In his third year, school hours will be extended until 10pm — Monday to Saturday— and for the last three months before graduation he will not have a single day off. Please compare these hours with the regulations on working hours in the Labor Law (勞動基準法)!
During his school years the student will receive a lot of corporal punishment — if he is not so good, nearly every day. Normally, the student will be punished in front of his (50 or so) classmates and after the punishment he has to say: “Thank you teacher.”
There are a lot reasons for punishment, for instance, if the student ranks fifth in a mid-term test and later only comes sixth, he will be punished.
If he is too tired and sleeps — punishment.
Sometimes the principal or the vice principal will personally administer the corporal punishment. Have they nothing better to do?
One day a student told me his teacher hit him on the joints of his hand. As a former boxer and prosecutor I know: don’t hit joints or bones — there is a high risk of injury.
These schools not only check the length of their students’ hair, they check their school bags for mobile phones and other “improper things.” So the human rights status of students in Taiwan is worse than in Cuba or China.
For what? They study China’s culture, geography and history but not so much about IT and computers. I can’t believe that this system is good.
I know some students with good test results in English. I can show them, for example, kitchen equipment and they can translate everything into English — but I would not attempt to have a conversation with them.
Every foreigner in Taiwan will tell you the same thing about Taiwanese people — they are really smart, but they can’t use English as a tool and they are very reluctant to make decisions by themselves.
The strangest thing is that Taiwanese parents really like this type of schooling, and are happy to sign an agreement that they won’t sue the school in the event of their children being punished.
Some Taiwanese say that’s Chinese culture. Maybe, but 100 years ago, China and Taiwan were semi-colonies and underdeveloped. Nobody can say that was a product of Chinese culture too.
CLAUDIUS PETZOLD
Pingjhen, Taoyuan County
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
If you had a vision of the future where China did not dominate the global car industry, you can kiss those dreams goodbye. That is because US President Donald Trump’s promised 25 percent tariff on auto imports takes an ax to the only bits of the emerging electric vehicle (EV) supply chain that are not already dominated by Beijing. The biggest losers when the levies take effect this week would be Japan and South Korea. They account for one-third of the cars imported into the US, and as much as two-thirds of those imported from outside North America. (Mexico and Canada, while
I have heard people equate the government’s stance on resisting forced unification with China or the conditional reinstatement of the military court system with the rise of the Nazis before World War II. The comparison is absurd. There is no meaningful parallel between the government and Nazi Germany, nor does such a mindset exist within the general public in Taiwan. It is important to remember that the German public bore some responsibility for the horrors of the Holocaust. Post-World War II Germany’s transitional justice efforts were rooted in a national reckoning and introspection. Many Jews were sent to concentration camps not
RSS