Why do some people reach their creative potential in business while other equally talented peers don’t?
After three decades of painstaking research, the Stanford psychologist Carol Dweck believes that the answer to the puzzle lies in how people think about intelligence and talent.
Those who believe they were born with all the smarts and gifts they’re ever going to have approach life with what she calls a “fixed mindset.”
Those who believe that their own abilities can expand over time, however, live with a “growth mindset.”
Guess which ones prove to be most innovative over time.
“Society is obsessed with the idea of talent and genius and people who are ‘naturals’ with innate ability,” says Dweck, who is known for research that crosses the boundaries of personal, social and developmental psychology.
“People who believe in the power of talent tend not to fulfill their potential because they’re so concerned with looking smart and not making mistakes,” Dweck says.
“But people who believe that talent can be developed are the ones who really push, stretch, confront their own mistakes and learn from them,” she says.
In this case, nurture wins out over nature just about every time.
FALL FROM GRACE
While some managers apply these principles every day, too many others instead believe that hiring the best and the brightest from top-flight schools guarantees corporate success.
The problem is that, having been identified as geniuses, the anointed become fearful of falling from grace.
“It’s hard to move forward creatively and especially to foster teamwork if each person is trying to look like the biggest star in the constellation,” Dweck says.
In her 2006 book, Mindset: The New Psychology of Success, she shows how adopting either a fixed or growth attitude toward talent can profoundly affect all aspects of a person’s life, from parenting and romantic relationships to success at school and on the job.
She attributes the success of several high-profile chief executives to their growth mindset, citing an ability to energize a work force.
These include John Welch Jr of General Electric, who valued teamwork over individual genius; Louis Gerstner Jr of IBM, who dedicated his book about IBM’s turnaround to “the thousands of IBMers who never gave up on their company”; and Anne Mulcahy of Xerox, who focused on morale and development of her people even as she implemented painful cuts.
But Dweck does not suggest that recruiters ignore innate talent. Instead, she suggests looking for both talent and a growth mindset in prospective hires — people with a passion for learning who thrive on challenge and change.
After reading her book, Scott Forstall, senior vice president of Apple in charge of iPhone software, contacted Dweck to talk about his experience putting together the iPhone development team. Forstall told her that he identified a number of superstars within various departments at Apple and asked them in for a chat.
MAKING MISTAKES
At the beginning of each interview, Forstall warned the recruit that he couldn’t reveal details of the project he was working on. But he promised the opportunity, Dweck says, “to make mistakes and struggle, but eventually we may do something that we’ll remember the rest of our lives.”
Only people who immediately jumped at the challenge ended up on the team.
“It was his intuition that he wanted people who valued stretching themselves over being king of their particular hill,” she says.
People with a growth mindset tend to demonstrate the kind of perseverance and resilience required to convert life’s setbacks into future successes.
That ability to learn from experience was cited as the No. 1 ingredient for creative achievement in a poll of 143 creativity researchers cited in Handbook of Creativity in 1999.
Which leads one to ask: Is it possible to shift from a fixed mindset to a growth mindset?
Absolutely, Dweck says.
But, “it’s not easy to just let go of something that has felt like your self for many years,” she writes.
Still, she says, “nothing is better than seeing people find their way to things they value.”
As strategic tensions escalate across the vast Indo-Pacific region, Taiwan has emerged as more than a potential flashpoint. It is the fulcrum upon which the credibility of the evolving American-led strategy of integrated deterrence now rests. How the US and regional powers like Japan respond to Taiwan’s defense, and how credible the deterrent against Chinese aggression proves to be, will profoundly shape the Indo-Pacific security architecture for years to come. A successful defense of Taiwan through strengthened deterrence in the Indo-Pacific would enhance the credibility of the US-led alliance system and underpin America’s global preeminence, while a failure of integrated deterrence would
It is being said every second day: The ongoing recall campaign in Taiwan — where citizens are trying to collect enough signatures to trigger re-elections for a number of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislators — is orchestrated by the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP), or even President William Lai (賴清德) himself. The KMT makes the claim, and foreign media and analysts repeat it. However, they never show any proof — because there is not any. It is alarming how easily academics, journalists and experts toss around claims that amount to accusing a democratic government of conspiracy — without a shred of evidence. These
Taiwan is confronting escalating threats from its behemoth neighbor. Last month, the Chinese People’s Liberation Army conducted live-fire drills in the East China Sea, practicing blockades and precision strikes on simulated targets, while its escalating cyberattacks targeting government, financial and telecommunication systems threaten to disrupt Taiwan’s digital infrastructure. The mounting geopolitical pressure underscores Taiwan’s need to strengthen its defense capabilities to deter possible aggression and improve civilian preparedness. The consequences of inadequate preparation have been made all too clear by the tragic situation in Ukraine. Taiwan can build on its successful COVID-19 response, marked by effective planning and execution, to enhance
Since taking office, US President Donald Trump has upheld the core goals of “making America safer, stronger, and more prosperous,” fully implementing an “America first” policy. Countries have responded cautiously to the fresh style and rapid pace of the new Trump administration. The US has prioritized reindustrialization, building a stronger US role in the Indo-Pacific, and countering China’s malicious influence. This has created a high degree of alignment between the interests of Taiwan and the US in security, economics, technology and other spheres. Taiwan must properly understand the Trump administration’s intentions and coordinate, connect and correspond with US strategic goals.
RSS