The first deep-sea mining machines — for extracting gold, silver and copper deposited near volcanic fissures on the ocean floor — are being built by a British engineering company. The pioneering designs, which will resemble giant, abrasive vacuum cleaners, are at the forefront of an emerging underwater mineral extraction industry that is sounding alarm bells among marine biologists and environmental scientists.
A £33 million (US$66 million) contract for two seafloor mining tools, capable of working at depths of more than 1,700m, was awarded last December to the Newcastle upon Tyne firm, Soil Machine Dynamics. If delivered according to schedule, the machines could begin excavation work by 2010 in the Pacific and inaugurate a new era in sub-sea exploration and mining.
The operation to recover these “poly-metallic” minerals, which are found in far higher concentrations than land-based ores, will generate a rich revenue source at a time when commodity prices are hitting record levels.
“We are leading the mining industry into the deep oceans,” said Scott Trebilcock, vice president of business development at Nautilus Minerals, the Canadian prospecting company that has ordered the machines.
“This is as big a change as it was for the oil and gas industry when it went offshore in the 1960s and 70s. Billions of dollars have been spent over decades developing [underwater] pumps, hydraulics and trench-digging machinery. We can use their technology for new targets: the poly-metallic deposits that contain gold, silver, zinc and copper,” he said.
Nautilus’s first project, the Solwara 1 field, is within Papua New Guinea’s territorial waters, but the firm, whose operational management is based in Brisbane, Australia, has also taken up license options on sites near Tonga, Fiji and New Zealand. Those locations have been chosen because of proximity to volcanic activity at the margins of the Earth’s tectonic plates.
“Deposits are formed from heated sea-water,” Trebilcock said. “As it filters deeper into cracks, it absorbs sulphur and becomes acidic. It can reach 300°C and dissolves minerals until it bubbles up and hits water on the ocean floor, which is at approximately 2°C.”
The metals precipitate out of solution and are deposited on the seabed. These so-called SMS — seafloor massive sulphides — resemble giant “elephant turds,” one oceanographer said.
Nautilus will work on underwater old vents that have cooled, some way back from the super-heated, active plate edges.
“Our material is 8 percent-10 percent copper,” Trebilcock said. “In land mines, the average is 0.5 percent. So for every tonne of copper produced, we move 40 times less material.”
Similar SMS deposits lie on the ocean floors around the world, particularly in the Arctic and along the Mid-Atlantic Ridge. Those areas, however, are at far greater depths and are subject to worse sea conditions.
Soil Machine Dynamics is designing and assembling a tool that has a rotating, cutting head — like the machines used to hew coal out of underground seams — surrounded by a giant suction pipe.
The company describes the equipment as “a novel design for recovering ore which is found in massive sulphide deposits in rugged terrain. It draws on technology developed in recent projects for trenching systems.”
The two seafloor mining systems will suck up 1.5 million tonnes of ore annually.
Trebilcock believes the operation will cause far less environmental damage than a similar-sized onshore mine.
“There’s no disturbance to the site around the mine. We’ll have no waste rock. Everything we take up will be smelted,” he said.
“We have carried out an environmental impact study, which will be published this year. We will have to show that we don’t have any long-term impact on any species or ecosystems. We have spoken to NGOs [non-governmental organizations] and the Papua New Guinea government about this,” he said.
“Oil and gas [companies] disturb a far larger area when they open up a new field. The dredging industry takes millions of tonnes off the ocean floor. We have significant [environmental] advantages over land-based companies,” he said.
However, some environmental groups are concerned that underwater mining will lead to despoilation of vast tracts of the seabed before they can be explored.
“These sites have limited physical integrity and great biodiversity,” Simon Cripps, director of WWF’s global marine program, recently told Chemistry World magazine.
“We would like to see a thorough, independent impact assessment before any mining work begins,” he said.
Catherine Coumans, a coordinator at Mining Watch Canada, has been to Papua New Guinea to examine the impact of mining.
“I have studied mines ... where the tailings [wastes] are flushed out to sea or simply dumped in rivers,” she said. “[Papua New Guinea] has, tragically, some of the worst forms of mining and disposal. Now it is going to have experimental undersea mining.”
“There are concerns about disturbance of the sea bottom. Very little is known about it. This is a new frontier that has yet to be explored with a fragile, marine ecosystem. There’s no significant independent work that has been done on the impact of mining. I would challenge the company to provide an independent scientific study,” she said.
Nautilus will not be the first underwater mining operation in the world.
De Beers has been stripping diamonds from the seabed off Namibia for several years, but at far shallower depths — generally around 150m.
As strategic tensions escalate across the vast Indo-Pacific region, Taiwan has emerged as more than a potential flashpoint. It is the fulcrum upon which the credibility of the evolving American-led strategy of integrated deterrence now rests. How the US and regional powers like Japan respond to Taiwan’s defense, and how credible the deterrent against Chinese aggression proves to be, will profoundly shape the Indo-Pacific security architecture for years to come. A successful defense of Taiwan through strengthened deterrence in the Indo-Pacific would enhance the credibility of the US-led alliance system and underpin America’s global preeminence, while a failure of integrated deterrence would
It is being said every second day: The ongoing recall campaign in Taiwan — where citizens are trying to collect enough signatures to trigger re-elections for a number of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislators — is orchestrated by the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP), or even President William Lai (賴清德) himself. The KMT makes the claim, and foreign media and analysts repeat it. However, they never show any proof — because there is not any. It is alarming how easily academics, journalists and experts toss around claims that amount to accusing a democratic government of conspiracy — without a shred of evidence. These
Taiwan is confronting escalating threats from its behemoth neighbor. Last month, the Chinese People’s Liberation Army conducted live-fire drills in the East China Sea, practicing blockades and precision strikes on simulated targets, while its escalating cyberattacks targeting government, financial and telecommunication systems threaten to disrupt Taiwan’s digital infrastructure. The mounting geopolitical pressure underscores Taiwan’s need to strengthen its defense capabilities to deter possible aggression and improve civilian preparedness. The consequences of inadequate preparation have been made all too clear by the tragic situation in Ukraine. Taiwan can build on its successful COVID-19 response, marked by effective planning and execution, to enhance
Since taking office, US President Donald Trump has upheld the core goals of “making America safer, stronger, and more prosperous,” fully implementing an “America first” policy. Countries have responded cautiously to the fresh style and rapid pace of the new Trump administration. The US has prioritized reindustrialization, building a stronger US role in the Indo-Pacific, and countering China’s malicious influence. This has created a high degree of alignment between the interests of Taiwan and the US in security, economics, technology and other spheres. Taiwan must properly understand the Trump administration’s intentions and coordinate, connect and correspond with US strategic goals.
RSS