Kao Shih-fan was correct in his article ("The best time for learning English," March 25, page 8) in concluding that "the earlier the better" is not true for second language acquisition.
In early stages of second language acquisition, older children are faster than younger children and adults are faster than children.
Kao is also correct in noting that the research shows that those who begin as adults typically have some accent.
I would like to add, however, that adults and children do not use different mechanisms for language acquisition. Although adults have a greater capacity for conscious understanding of the rules of a language -- thanks to greater "abstract thinking capacities" -- this doesn't help very much. In my view, the research shows that nearly all adult second language competence, like that of children, is acquired subconsciously, by understanding messages.
Also, adults may not achieve perfection, but they often do very well, acquiring nearly all of the second language, including an extremely complex grammatical system and thousands of words.
Many of my colleagues in Taiwan are good examples of adults who have achieved high levels of competence in English. The "imperfections" in their English are very small, such as an occasional grammatical slip or a slight accent. None of them would claim that hard study was responsible for their attainment, but all have read and continue to read English a great deal and all have heard a great deal of comprehensible English, similar to the high-level English acquirers Kao has studied.
Starting English at a very early age is not necessary or even helpful. Those who start as adults can achieve very high levels of competence -- not through work and grim determination, but through enjoying good books and movies and other kinds of comprehensible input.
Stephen Krashen
Los Angeles, California
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS