It would be hard to miss the non-stop reporting on cable news channels about the details of the everyday life of president-elect Ma Ying-jeou (
After Ma won Saturday's presidential election, cable news stations rushed to bring viewers almost instantaneous coverage on a variety of his personal details.
The stations are pulling out all the stops. Topping the news on cable channels are what the president-elect likes and dislikes, how he likes his hair cut and how he styles it, his zodiac sign and whether he and his wife Chow Mei-ching (
It may seem like the staff at these news channels have reverted to junior high crushes, but even so the conspicuously positive reporting is reminiscent of the days of dictatorship. The overt attempts to present Ma as charming may cast doubt on the media's progress since the days when it was a key tool of idol-making in the service of Chiang Kai-shek (
The next president clearly deserves public attention, but cable news stations are focusing on inane personal details instead of any number of crucial issues he will soon have to face as president.
The media's depiction of Ma as almost flawless in his patriotism and kindness is disturbingly similar to the quaint anecdotes of the Martial Law era that were designed to inspire awe and loyalty to Chiang Kai-shek.
Back then, Taiwanese were fed stories about his childhood and impeccable behavior while growing up. Likewise, Taiwanese were told that every act Chiang Ching-kuo performed reflected his love of the people.
The media circus over the past few days does not augur well. After Ma's inauguration on May 20, will these channels offer fair and balanced coverage of Ma's successes and follies or will they seek to embellish their image of him?
Ma has long said that Chiang Ching-kuo was his idol. The public no doubt hopes he will mimic Chiang Ching-kuo's achievements in terms of the nation's economic development and show a fervent desire to develop Taiwan.
But the public should also want fair and unbiased media coverage of his administration. The media serve to check those in power, not help them by promoting a skewed picture of who they are and what they do.
The starstruck behavior of news outlets is cause for concern -- no leader should be allowed to escape the scrutiny of professional media coverage that has the public's best interests in mind.
The day after Ma was elected, cable news channels spent little air time on the plight of Tibetans as China continued its crackdown, nor the cries of Tibetans exiled in Taiwan as they fasted in front of Liberty Square.
This is hardly flattering to an institution that sometimes calls itself the "fourth estate" and claims it fights for the public's right to know.
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its
RSS