On Saturday, Aboriginal tribes from all over Taiwan took part in a march for their rights. At the same time, the pan-blue and pan-green camps continue to stereotype Aborigines and exploit their cultural symbols. Most disturbingly, in the last couple days, the media has extensively reported that Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) presidential candidate Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九), with the support of certain Aboriginal religious and tribal groups, has been appointed the so-called "head chief" of the Aboriginal tribes.
The support of particular parties or politicians by individual Aborigines, or by Aboriginal organizations or religious groups, is part of their freedom of expression and a manifestation of an open, liberal and diverse society that respects the civic rights of individuals or groups to political participation.
Yet, why should the head-dress and staff, which represent tribal authority, be given to a colonial Han regime as an expression of these democratic political rights?
The leaders of Aboriginal groups and Aboriginal politicians should be extremely careful to avoid letting their individual political positions and loyalties violate the basic rights and the dignity of Aborigines.
Furthermore, today, when Aboriginal rights awareness is becoming increasingly widespread and when the UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples has been passed, it is both sad and revolting to see the return of such feudal and authoritarian behavior as the crowning of a "father" of the Aborigines and a "mighty and enlightened chief."
Political parties and Aboriginal politicians should prudently determine whether their personal behavior infringes on the rights and the dignity of all Aborigines.
Unfortunately, Han politicians often play to the masses and rather than exercising self-control and maintaining their place, they cross the border of Aboriginal dignity. This kind of infringement occurs whenever elections take place or when Aboriginal tribes hold important ceremonies.
The collective support of parties or candidates by Aboriginal civic or religious groups would be commendable if it had been subject to thorough internal discussion and was based on their organizational principles, the expression of their religious beliefs and the realization of their goals in social development. Unfortunately, media coverage have not shown that this was the case.
The positions of Aboriginal groups are not differentiated from that of other civic groups or political parties and there is even the emergence of slogans proclaiming "absolute loyalty" to Ma, the "head chief," and the tendency to deify political figures. This is a violation of the basic theology of Aboriginal beliefs.
The political participation of Aboriginal civic and religious groups should hold the principles of self-government and self-determination at its core and the realization of a political society should be founded on equal "state to state" relations as advocated by Aboriginal rights movements around the world, while also reflecting the spirit of the "new partnership" proposed by the UN.
Aboriginal group leaders who hold positions that put their words and actions in the public spotlight should exercise even more prudence to avoid damaging the dignity of their tribes.
Han politicians, whether pan-blue or pan-green, should also know their place. Anyone who destroys ethnic equality and infringes upon Aboriginal dignity should be spurned by the public.
Isak Afo is a member of the Amis tribe and spokesperson for the Taiwan Indigenous Association.
Translated by Angela Hong
China has not been a top-tier issue for much of the second Trump administration. Instead, Trump has focused considerable energy on Ukraine, Israel, Iran, and defending America’s borders. At home, Trump has been busy passing an overhaul to America’s tax system, deporting unlawful immigrants, and targeting his political enemies. More recently, he has been consumed by the fallout of a political scandal involving his past relationship with a disgraced sex offender. When the administration has focused on China, there has not been a consistent throughline in its approach or its public statements. This lack of overarching narrative likely reflects a combination
US President Donald Trump’s alleged request that Taiwanese President William Lai (賴清德) not stop in New York while traveling to three of Taiwan’s diplomatic allies, after his administration also rescheduled a visit to Washington by the minister of national defense, sets an unwise precedent and risks locking the US into a trajectory of either direct conflict with the People’s Republic of China (PRC) or capitulation to it over Taiwan. Taiwanese authorities have said that no plans to request a stopover in the US had been submitted to Washington, but Trump shared a direct call with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平)
Heavy rains over the past week have overwhelmed southern and central Taiwan, with flooding, landslides, road closures, damage to property and the evacuations of thousands of people. Schools and offices were closed in some areas due to the deluge throughout the week. The heavy downpours brought by the southwest monsoon are a second blow to a region still recovering from last month’s Typhoon Danas. Strong winds and significant rain from the storm inflicted more than NT$2.6 billion (US$86.6 million) in agricultural losses, and damaged more than 23,000 roofs and a record high of nearly 2,500 utility poles, causing power outages. As
The greatest pressure Taiwan has faced in negotiations stems from its continuously growing trade surplus with the US. Taiwan’s trade surplus with the US reached an unprecedented high last year, surging by 54.6 percent from the previous year and placing it among the top six countries with which the US has a trade deficit. The figures became Washington’s primary reason for adopting its firm stance and demanding substantial concessions from Taipei, which put Taiwan at somewhat of a disadvantage at the negotiating table. Taiwan’s most crucial bargaining chip is undoubtedly its key position in the global semiconductor supply chain, which led
RSS