Thirteen years ago, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) government proposed the establishment of an Asia-Pacific Regional Operations Center (APROC). Two years later, then-minister of economic affairs Wang Chih-kang (王志剛) said that his ministry had spent billions of NT dollars and published more than 100 papers over a period of eight years in order to make the center a reality.
But in April that year, Michael Porter, a Harvard professor, was invited to Taiwan to hold a lecture on improving national competitiveness.
He said that the future of Taiwan's economy was uncertain and, using the APROC project as an example, added that many other countries or areas -- including Singapore and Hong Kong -- were doing more or less the same thing, with only a few differences, and that those countries might be even more advanced than Taiwan.
Porter also said that Taiwan's development of the APROC would result in Taiwanese dependence on the Chinese market, adding that Taiwan's biggest problem was a lack of long-term vision and that the project would become a mess.
Although the KMT's promise for the new century focused on a push for the APROC to move Taiwan's national competitiveness into the top-five of the International Institute for Management Development world competitiveness listing, the nation's ranking dropped to 18.
This was the reason why Vincent Siew (
Ironically, Siew, now the KMT vice presidential candidate, is once again relying on the APROC to define Taiwan as the global operations center for Taiwanese businesspeople and the Asia-Pacific operations center for overseas businesspeople to turn Taiwan into a part of a common Chinese market.
As Porter said, the APROC is a passive strategy controlled by others rather than an active strategy that we can control ourselves.
The APROC of yore and today's common Chinese market are but a kind of "colonial comprador economy" that plunders and exploits local resources for profit. This will only benefit compradors, or intermediaries, with special privileges and hurt most Taiwanese and the country's natural environment.
Consequently, as former Democratic Progressive Party legislator Lin Cho-shui (
The presidential election is crucial to the transformation of Taiwan's economy. Our votes will decide whether we will put an end to this kind of "colonial comprador economy" and open up a new path for an independent and free Taiwanese economy.
Bob Kuo is a professor in the Department of Information Management at National Sun Yat-sen University.
Translated by Eddy Chang
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its
RSS