Thirteen years ago, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) government proposed the establishment of an Asia-Pacific Regional Operations Center (APROC). Two years later, then-minister of economic affairs Wang Chih-kang (王志剛) said that his ministry had spent billions of NT dollars and published more than 100 papers over a period of eight years in order to make the center a reality.
But in April that year, Michael Porter, a Harvard professor, was invited to Taiwan to hold a lecture on improving national competitiveness.
He said that the future of Taiwan's economy was uncertain and, using the APROC project as an example, added that many other countries or areas -- including Singapore and Hong Kong -- were doing more or less the same thing, with only a few differences, and that those countries might be even more advanced than Taiwan.
Porter also said that Taiwan's development of the APROC would result in Taiwanese dependence on the Chinese market, adding that Taiwan's biggest problem was a lack of long-term vision and that the project would become a mess.
Although the KMT's promise for the new century focused on a push for the APROC to move Taiwan's national competitiveness into the top-five of the International Institute for Management Development world competitiveness listing, the nation's ranking dropped to 18.
This was the reason why Vincent Siew (
Ironically, Siew, now the KMT vice presidential candidate, is once again relying on the APROC to define Taiwan as the global operations center for Taiwanese businesspeople and the Asia-Pacific operations center for overseas businesspeople to turn Taiwan into a part of a common Chinese market.
As Porter said, the APROC is a passive strategy controlled by others rather than an active strategy that we can control ourselves.
The APROC of yore and today's common Chinese market are but a kind of "colonial comprador economy" that plunders and exploits local resources for profit. This will only benefit compradors, or intermediaries, with special privileges and hurt most Taiwanese and the country's natural environment.
Consequently, as former Democratic Progressive Party legislator Lin Cho-shui (
The presidential election is crucial to the transformation of Taiwan's economy. Our votes will decide whether we will put an end to this kind of "colonial comprador economy" and open up a new path for an independent and free Taiwanese economy.
Bob Kuo is a professor in the Department of Information Management at National Sun Yat-sen University.
Translated by Eddy Chang
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
If you had a vision of the future where China did not dominate the global car industry, you can kiss those dreams goodbye. That is because US President Donald Trump’s promised 25 percent tariff on auto imports takes an ax to the only bits of the emerging electric vehicle (EV) supply chain that are not already dominated by Beijing. The biggest losers when the levies take effect this week would be Japan and South Korea. They account for one-third of the cars imported into the US, and as much as two-thirds of those imported from outside North America. (Mexico and Canada, while
I have heard people equate the government’s stance on resisting forced unification with China or the conditional reinstatement of the military court system with the rise of the Nazis before World War II. The comparison is absurd. There is no meaningful parallel between the government and Nazi Germany, nor does such a mindset exist within the general public in Taiwan. It is important to remember that the German public bore some responsibility for the horrors of the Holocaust. Post-World War II Germany’s transitional justice efforts were rooted in a national reckoning and introspection. Many Jews were sent to concentration camps not
RSS