Thirteen years ago, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) government proposed the establishment of an Asia-Pacific Regional Operations Center (APROC). Two years later, then-minister of economic affairs Wang Chih-kang (王志剛) said that his ministry had spent billions of NT dollars and published more than 100 papers over a period of eight years in order to make the center a reality.
But in April that year, Michael Porter, a Harvard professor, was invited to Taiwan to hold a lecture on improving national competitiveness.
He said that the future of Taiwan's economy was uncertain and, using the APROC project as an example, added that many other countries or areas -- including Singapore and Hong Kong -- were doing more or less the same thing, with only a few differences, and that those countries might be even more advanced than Taiwan.
Porter also said that Taiwan's development of the APROC would result in Taiwanese dependence on the Chinese market, adding that Taiwan's biggest problem was a lack of long-term vision and that the project would become a mess.
Although the KMT's promise for the new century focused on a push for the APROC to move Taiwan's national competitiveness into the top-five of the International Institute for Management Development world competitiveness listing, the nation's ranking dropped to 18.
This was the reason why Vincent Siew (
Ironically, Siew, now the KMT vice presidential candidate, is once again relying on the APROC to define Taiwan as the global operations center for Taiwanese businesspeople and the Asia-Pacific operations center for overseas businesspeople to turn Taiwan into a part of a common Chinese market.
As Porter said, the APROC is a passive strategy controlled by others rather than an active strategy that we can control ourselves.
The APROC of yore and today's common Chinese market are but a kind of "colonial comprador economy" that plunders and exploits local resources for profit. This will only benefit compradors, or intermediaries, with special privileges and hurt most Taiwanese and the country's natural environment.
Consequently, as former Democratic Progressive Party legislator Lin Cho-shui (
The presidential election is crucial to the transformation of Taiwan's economy. Our votes will decide whether we will put an end to this kind of "colonial comprador economy" and open up a new path for an independent and free Taiwanese economy.
Bob Kuo is a professor in the Department of Information Management at National Sun Yat-sen University.
Translated by Eddy Chang
A failure by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) to respond to Israel’s brilliant 12-day (June 12-23) bombing and special operations war against Iran, topped by US President Donald Trump’s ordering the June 21 bombing of Iranian deep underground nuclear weapons fuel processing sites, has been noted by some as demonstrating a profound lack of resolve, even “impotence,” by China. However, this would be a dangerous underestimation of CCP ambitions and its broader and more profound military response to the Trump Administration — a challenge that includes an acceleration of its strategies to assist nuclear proxy states, and developing a wide array
Eating at a breakfast shop the other day, I turned to an old man sitting at the table next to mine. “Hey, did you hear that the Legislative Yuan passed a bill to give everyone NT$10,000 [US$340]?” I said, pointing to a newspaper headline. The old man cursed, then said: “Yeah, the Chinese Nationalist Party [KMT] canceled the NT$100 billion subsidy for Taiwan Power Co and announced they would give everyone NT$10,000 instead. “Nice. Now they are saying that if electricity prices go up, we can just use that cash to pay for it,” he said. “I have no time for drivel like
Twenty-four Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers are facing recall votes on Saturday, prompting nearly all KMT officials and lawmakers to rally their supporters over the past weekend, urging them to vote “no” in a bid to retain their seats and preserve the KMT’s majority in the Legislative Yuan. The Democratic Progressive Party (DPP), which had largely kept its distance from the civic recall campaigns, earlier this month instructed its officials and staff to support the recall groups in a final push to protect the nation. The justification for the recalls has increasingly been framed as a “resistance” movement against China and
Chinese Minister of Foreign Affairs Wang Yi (王毅) reportedly told the EU’s top diplomat that China does not want Russia to lose in Ukraine, because the US could shift its focus to countering Beijing. Wang made the comment while meeting with EU High Representative for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy Kaja Kallas on July 2 at the 13th China-EU High-Level Strategic Dialogue in Brussels, the South China Morning Post and CNN reported. Although contrary to China’s claim of neutrality in the Russia-Ukraine conflict, such a frank remark suggests Beijing might prefer a protracted war to keep the US from focusing on
RSS