Although far from perfect, Taiwan's democracy is developing in a positive direction, as can be seen in the clean-up of campaign materials in recent years.
In the past, a lot of material was aggressive and anonymous -- unsubstantiated and unsigned attacks were a common trick and were especially damaging when released just prior to elections, giving candidates little chance to defend themselves before votes were counted.
The worst kind of negative propaganda results in unfair elections, which is why the Election and Recall Act (
A notorious example is the series of Special Report VCDs (
However, this did not stop production of similar propaganda videos. At the time, pan-green candidates did not think of the VCDs as illegal or even unethical. They not only silently condoned this negative campaigning, but also criticized prosecutors who investigated and confiscated copies and defended the producers.
The new Taiwan Weekly appears to be a print version of the Special Report VCDs. The two issues that have been publishedeto date have attacked Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) presidential candidate Ma Ying-jeou (
Although the nation underwent a power shift when the DPP came to power eight years ago, a similar shift did not occur in the media as a majority of outlets still lean toward the pan-blue camp. The KMT's assets also allow the party to buy advertising time, enlarging the gap in media coverage of the pan-blue and pan-green campaigns. At the same time, confrontation between pro-blue and pro-green media outlets results in both groups straying from journalistic ethics and standards.
The Special Report VCDs and the Taiwan Weekly incidents can be read as a protest by small media outlets against their bigger counterparts. But regardless of their objectives, negative propaganda is never acceptable.
Both campaign teams have condemned the Taiwan Weekly, but this is unlikely to stop negative material from appearing. If the interests of the candidates are infringed upon, they can always turn to the judicial system. In the meantime, both camps would do well to cut back on the negative rhetoric and focus on their positive attributes.
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its
RSS