Although far from perfect, Taiwan's democracy is developing in a positive direction, as can be seen in the clean-up of campaign materials in recent years.
In the past, a lot of material was aggressive and anonymous -- unsubstantiated and unsigned attacks were a common trick and were especially damaging when released just prior to elections, giving candidates little chance to defend themselves before votes were counted.
The worst kind of negative propaganda results in unfair elections, which is why the Election and Recall Act (
A notorious example is the series of Special Report VCDs (
However, this did not stop production of similar propaganda videos. At the time, pan-green candidates did not think of the VCDs as illegal or even unethical. They not only silently condoned this negative campaigning, but also criticized prosecutors who investigated and confiscated copies and defended the producers.
The new Taiwan Weekly appears to be a print version of the Special Report VCDs. The two issues that have been publishedeto date have attacked Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) presidential candidate Ma Ying-jeou (
Although the nation underwent a power shift when the DPP came to power eight years ago, a similar shift did not occur in the media as a majority of outlets still lean toward the pan-blue camp. The KMT's assets also allow the party to buy advertising time, enlarging the gap in media coverage of the pan-blue and pan-green campaigns. At the same time, confrontation between pro-blue and pro-green media outlets results in both groups straying from journalistic ethics and standards.
The Special Report VCDs and the Taiwan Weekly incidents can be read as a protest by small media outlets against their bigger counterparts. But regardless of their objectives, negative propaganda is never acceptable.
Both campaign teams have condemned the Taiwan Weekly, but this is unlikely to stop negative material from appearing. If the interests of the candidates are infringed upon, they can always turn to the judicial system. In the meantime, both camps would do well to cut back on the negative rhetoric and focus on their positive attributes.
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS