Although far from perfect, Taiwan's democracy is developing in a positive direction, as can be seen in the clean-up of campaign materials in recent years.
In the past, a lot of material was aggressive and anonymous -- unsubstantiated and unsigned attacks were a common trick and were especially damaging when released just prior to elections, giving candidates little chance to defend themselves before votes were counted.
The worst kind of negative propaganda results in unfair elections, which is why the Election and Recall Act (
A notorious example is the series of Special Report VCDs (
However, this did not stop production of similar propaganda videos. At the time, pan-green candidates did not think of the VCDs as illegal or even unethical. They not only silently condoned this negative campaigning, but also criticized prosecutors who investigated and confiscated copies and defended the producers.
The new Taiwan Weekly appears to be a print version of the Special Report VCDs. The two issues that have been publishedeto date have attacked Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) presidential candidate Ma Ying-jeou (
Although the nation underwent a power shift when the DPP came to power eight years ago, a similar shift did not occur in the media as a majority of outlets still lean toward the pan-blue camp. The KMT's assets also allow the party to buy advertising time, enlarging the gap in media coverage of the pan-blue and pan-green campaigns. At the same time, confrontation between pro-blue and pro-green media outlets results in both groups straying from journalistic ethics and standards.
The Special Report VCDs and the Taiwan Weekly incidents can be read as a protest by small media outlets against their bigger counterparts. But regardless of their objectives, negative propaganda is never acceptable.
Both campaign teams have condemned the Taiwan Weekly, but this is unlikely to stop negative material from appearing. If the interests of the candidates are infringed upon, they can always turn to the judicial system. In the meantime, both camps would do well to cut back on the negative rhetoric and focus on their positive attributes.
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
If you had a vision of the future where China did not dominate the global car industry, you can kiss those dreams goodbye. That is because US President Donald Trump’s promised 25 percent tariff on auto imports takes an ax to the only bits of the emerging electric vehicle (EV) supply chain that are not already dominated by Beijing. The biggest losers when the levies take effect this week would be Japan and South Korea. They account for one-third of the cars imported into the US, and as much as two-thirds of those imported from outside North America. (Mexico and Canada, while
I have heard people equate the government’s stance on resisting forced unification with China or the conditional reinstatement of the military court system with the rise of the Nazis before World War II. The comparison is absurd. There is no meaningful parallel between the government and Nazi Germany, nor does such a mindset exist within the general public in Taiwan. It is important to remember that the German public bore some responsibility for the horrors of the Holocaust. Post-World War II Germany’s transitional justice efforts were rooted in a national reckoning and introspection. Many Jews were sent to concentration camps not
RSS