Charitable smearing
Dear Johnny,
Frank Hsieh's (
Frank's campaign would make much more sense if he offered alternatives to Ma's polices or pointed out his weak points. However, with all these smear tactics -- starting with A-bian (
On the new allegation of a lack of transparency over dealings with the Taipei Fubon Bank during Ma's time as Taipei mayor: Why didn't the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) express its concern earlier? Now it just looks like they're doing it to smear Ma and make him a victim of a DPP conspiracy.
Erik Lenhart
Johnny replies: Frank Hsieh's campaign would make more sense if the DPP registered itself as a charity.
That way, after they lose the presidential election, DPP strategists will have something constructive to do with their time other than enquire into their rivals' passport status.
The road to an insurgency
Dear Johnny,
I'm another politically minded Jimmy Waiguoren who reads your column each week, but haven't bothered to write until now.
I was a little disturbed by an article in the Taipei Times entitled "Seeking younger voters, Hsieh hits YouTube Web site," (March 4, page 3), in which a poll conducted by the United Daily News suggested that 60 percent of respondents between 20 and 29 years of age support a Ma Ying-jeou-Vincent Siew (蕭萬長) ticket -- compared with 21 percent for Hsieh and Su Tseng-chang (蘇貞昌).
Putting aside the inaccuracies of these types of polls, it kind of got me thinking. First, if this is remotely true then it's a cause for concern.
Second, maybe Hsieh on YouTube isn't as silly as it sounds.
And third, how would it be if someone like yourself was able to contribute more directly to a dialogue with Taiwan's younger generation?
Being a student at National Chengchi University, I'd certainly be supportive of anything that raised awareness of the potential dangers of a KMT-dominated legislature and a KMT president.
Have you ever considered blogging your personal views in Chinese and English to make them more accessible? Or getting savvy like Hsieh and starting up a Facebook group with an unashamedly political bent?
Although too late for this election, I reckon something like this would make a valuable contribution to "keeping the bastards honest," as we say in Australia.
Karl Haby
Taipei
Johnny replies: I keep getting these e-mails from old school chums who have started up accounts on Facebook. Problem is, in order to look at them I have to open my own Facebook account. The hell with that!
The whole thing reeks of viral marketing and is only so different from spam. So you can count old Johnny out on that one.
As for a blog ... to be honest, Karl, blogs are like newspapers. The vast majority of the effort that goes into them is forgotten the day after, unless you write stuff so deep that people think your archives are worth poring over. But if you give me cash ...
Nah, for now I think I'll do something more constructive: Prepare an anti-communist guerrilla insurgency.
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its
RSS