Charitable smearing
Dear Johnny,
Frank Hsieh's (
Frank's campaign would make much more sense if he offered alternatives to Ma's polices or pointed out his weak points. However, with all these smear tactics -- starting with A-bian (
On the new allegation of a lack of transparency over dealings with the Taipei Fubon Bank during Ma's time as Taipei mayor: Why didn't the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) express its concern earlier? Now it just looks like they're doing it to smear Ma and make him a victim of a DPP conspiracy.
Erik Lenhart
Johnny replies: Frank Hsieh's campaign would make more sense if the DPP registered itself as a charity.
That way, after they lose the presidential election, DPP strategists will have something constructive to do with their time other than enquire into their rivals' passport status.
The road to an insurgency
Dear Johnny,
I'm another politically minded Jimmy Waiguoren who reads your column each week, but haven't bothered to write until now.
I was a little disturbed by an article in the Taipei Times entitled "Seeking younger voters, Hsieh hits YouTube Web site," (March 4, page 3), in which a poll conducted by the United Daily News suggested that 60 percent of respondents between 20 and 29 years of age support a Ma Ying-jeou-Vincent Siew (蕭萬長) ticket -- compared with 21 percent for Hsieh and Su Tseng-chang (蘇貞昌).
Putting aside the inaccuracies of these types of polls, it kind of got me thinking. First, if this is remotely true then it's a cause for concern.
Second, maybe Hsieh on YouTube isn't as silly as it sounds.
And third, how would it be if someone like yourself was able to contribute more directly to a dialogue with Taiwan's younger generation?
Being a student at National Chengchi University, I'd certainly be supportive of anything that raised awareness of the potential dangers of a KMT-dominated legislature and a KMT president.
Have you ever considered blogging your personal views in Chinese and English to make them more accessible? Or getting savvy like Hsieh and starting up a Facebook group with an unashamedly political bent?
Although too late for this election, I reckon something like this would make a valuable contribution to "keeping the bastards honest," as we say in Australia.
Karl Haby
Taipei
Johnny replies: I keep getting these e-mails from old school chums who have started up accounts on Facebook. Problem is, in order to look at them I have to open my own Facebook account. The hell with that!
The whole thing reeks of viral marketing and is only so different from spam. So you can count old Johnny out on that one.
As for a blog ... to be honest, Karl, blogs are like newspapers. The vast majority of the effort that goes into them is forgotten the day after, unless you write stuff so deep that people think your archives are worth poring over. But if you give me cash ...
Nah, for now I think I'll do something more constructive: Prepare an anti-communist guerrilla insurgency.
Apart from the first arms sales approval for Taiwan since US President Donald Trump took office, last month also witnessed another milestone for Taiwan-US relations. Trump signed the Taiwan Assurance Implementation Act into law on Tuesday. Its passing without objection in the US Senate underscores how bipartisan US support for Taiwan has evolved. The new law would further help normalize exchanges between Taiwanese and US government officials. We have already seen a flurry of visits to Washington earlier this summer, not only with Minister of Foreign Affairs Lin Chia-lung (林佳龍), but also delegations led by National Security Council Secretary-General Joseph Wu
When the towers of Wang Fuk Court turned into a seven-building inferno on Wednesday last week, killing 128 people, including a firefighter, Hong Kong officials promised investigations, pledged to review regulations and within hours issued a plan to replace bamboo scaffolding with steel. It sounded decisive. It was not. The gestures are about political optics, not accountability. The tragedy was not caused by bamboo or by outdated laws. Flame-retardant netting is already required. Under Hong Kong’s Mandatory Building Inspection Scheme — which requires buildings more than 30 years old to undergo inspection every decade and compulsory repairs — the framework for
In A phone call between US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平), Xi is reported to have stated that in his view, “Taiwan’s return to China” is to be considered an integral part of the post-World War II international order. Never mind that China under Xi has been trying to undermine the liberal post-war international order by setting up alternative organizations and schemes that are detrimental to freedom and democracy around the world. Its own repression of Tibet, Xinjiang and Hong Kong are vivid examples. The “return to China” is the biggest misnomer: Taiwan has never ever been part
President William Lai (賴清德) on Wednesday last week announced a plan to invest an additional NT$1.25 trillion (US$39.8 billion) in military spending to procure advanced defense systems over the next eight years, and outlined two major plans and concrete steps to defend democratic Taiwan in the face of China’s intensifying threat. While Lai’s plans for boosting the country’s national security have been praised by many US lawmakers, former defense officials, academics and the American Institute in Taiwan, the US’ de facto embassy in Taiwan, they were not equally welcomed by all Taiwanese, particularly among the opposition parties. Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman
RSS