Nothing better betrays a politician trying to line his or her pockets than complaining bitterly about a problem and blaming it on political foes -- but doing absolutely nothing about it.
Over the last few national elections, members of the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) have peddled conspiracy theories on members of the armed forces having their right to vote infringed upon by partisan elements in the military command.
No evidence of this was ever furnished -- hardly surprising -- but it was nonetheless disappointing that the KMT and the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) government neglected to take the issue to the next level and fix the problem for good by installing a system of domestic absentee voting.
Mature democracies all over the world provide for an absentee ballot for voters who cannot be in their electoral district on the day of an election. This option reflects the reality of modern life: Professional and recreational mobility and emergency services are part of the way we live. It is ridiculous to punish voters and lessen the representativeness of an electoral result by not offering an absentee ballot option.
Taiwan's electoral system requires voters to physically return to the place where they are registered as resident before they can vote. This colonial residue of social control in the Japanese and KMT White Terror eras is pointless and should be ditched.
But there are other reasons why the present arrangement is absurd. It discriminates against police, the military and other essential services whose members do not necessarily have the option of returning home to vote. It discriminates against anyone who must pay significant sums of money to return "home." It discriminates against rural areas, which are short-changed by having their absent voters silenced.
And given the prevalence of vote-buying, the system in effect discriminates in favor of voters in rural and remote areas who have to demonstrate by surreptitious means that their vote has not only been bought but also delivered.
The introduction of an absentee ballot would add a degree of complexity to the counting of votes. But such complexity is part and parcel of democratic mechanisms in other countries and should pose no challenge to a system as transparent as Taiwan's electoral mechanism.
This is a non-partisan issue. Even so, it is odd that the DPP should have pushed so hard to introduce electoral reform -- downsizing the legislature, redrawing electoral boundaries and limiting electorates to one legislator -- that was against its medium-term legislative interests, while at the same time showing little interest in empowering the arguably larger number of DPP voters who move to the metropolis from their rural base and do not or cannot return to vote.
The KMT, for its part, could gain some credibility as custodian of an adolescent democratic system by taking this matter seriously and moving to scrap this dinosaur-like restriction. Unfortunately, with the KMT dominating the legislature and a KMT member likely to be in the Presidential Office, it is difficult to see where the impetus for change might come from.
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its
RSS