Nothing better betrays a politician trying to line his or her pockets than complaining bitterly about a problem and blaming it on political foes -- but doing absolutely nothing about it.
Over the last few national elections, members of the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) have peddled conspiracy theories on members of the armed forces having their right to vote infringed upon by partisan elements in the military command.
No evidence of this was ever furnished -- hardly surprising -- but it was nonetheless disappointing that the KMT and the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) government neglected to take the issue to the next level and fix the problem for good by installing a system of domestic absentee voting.
Mature democracies all over the world provide for an absentee ballot for voters who cannot be in their electoral district on the day of an election. This option reflects the reality of modern life: Professional and recreational mobility and emergency services are part of the way we live. It is ridiculous to punish voters and lessen the representativeness of an electoral result by not offering an absentee ballot option.
Taiwan's electoral system requires voters to physically return to the place where they are registered as resident before they can vote. This colonial residue of social control in the Japanese and KMT White Terror eras is pointless and should be ditched.
But there are other reasons why the present arrangement is absurd. It discriminates against police, the military and other essential services whose members do not necessarily have the option of returning home to vote. It discriminates against anyone who must pay significant sums of money to return "home." It discriminates against rural areas, which are short-changed by having their absent voters silenced.
And given the prevalence of vote-buying, the system in effect discriminates in favor of voters in rural and remote areas who have to demonstrate by surreptitious means that their vote has not only been bought but also delivered.
The introduction of an absentee ballot would add a degree of complexity to the counting of votes. But such complexity is part and parcel of democratic mechanisms in other countries and should pose no challenge to a system as transparent as Taiwan's electoral mechanism.
This is a non-partisan issue. Even so, it is odd that the DPP should have pushed so hard to introduce electoral reform -- downsizing the legislature, redrawing electoral boundaries and limiting electorates to one legislator -- that was against its medium-term legislative interests, while at the same time showing little interest in empowering the arguably larger number of DPP voters who move to the metropolis from their rural base and do not or cannot return to vote.
The KMT, for its part, could gain some credibility as custodian of an adolescent democratic system by taking this matter seriously and moving to scrap this dinosaur-like restriction. Unfortunately, with the KMT dominating the legislature and a KMT member likely to be in the Presidential Office, it is difficult to see where the impetus for change might come from.
There will be a new presidential administration in the United States in January 2025. It will be important for the Lai (賴清德) administration and America’s next administration to get on the same page quickly and visibly in respective efforts to bolster Taiwan’s security, economic vitality, and dignity and respect on the world stage. One key measure for doing so will be whether Washington and Taipei can coalesce around a common narrative for moving US-Taiwan relations forward. In recent years, Washington and Taipei have leaned into fear as a motivator for coordinated action. For a time, both sides publicly reinforced each other’s
Recently, the Liberty Times (the Taipei Times’ sister newspaper) published three of my articles on the US presidential election, which is to be held on Nov. 5. I would like to share my perspective on the intense and stalemated presidential election with the people of Taiwan, as well as Taiwanese and Chinese Americans in the US. The current consensus of both major US political parties is to counter China and protect Taiwan. However, I do not trust former US president Donald Trump. He has questioned the US’ commitment to defending Taiwan and explicitly stated the significant challenges involved in doing so. “Trump believes
The government is considering building a semiconductor cluster in Europe, specifically in the Czech Republic, to support Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co’s (TSMC) new fab in Dresden, Germany, and to help local companies explore new business opportunities there. Europe wants to ensure the security of its semiconductor sector, but a lack of comprehensive supply chains there could pose significant risks to semiconductor clusters. The Czech government is aggressively seeking to build its own semiconductor industry and showing strong interest in collaborating with Taiwanese companies. Executive Yuan Secretary-General Kung Ming-hsin (龔明鑫) on Friday said that Taiwan is optimistic about building a semiconductor cluster in
Embroiled in multiple scandals, Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) Chairman Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) on Thursday announced that he would apply for a three-month leave of absence from his role as party leader, creating uncertainty about the future of the TPP and the “new politics” that he had promised to bring. Shortly after his announcement, Ko’s home and office were searched and he was questioned by prosecutors over his suspected involvement in a corruption case related to a real-estate development project. He was arrested early Saturday morning after he refused to be questioned at night and attempted to leave the prosecutors’ office. In
RSS