Nothing better betrays a politician trying to line his or her pockets than complaining bitterly about a problem and blaming it on political foes -- but doing absolutely nothing about it.
Over the last few national elections, members of the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) have peddled conspiracy theories on members of the armed forces having their right to vote infringed upon by partisan elements in the military command.
No evidence of this was ever furnished -- hardly surprising -- but it was nonetheless disappointing that the KMT and the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) government neglected to take the issue to the next level and fix the problem for good by installing a system of domestic absentee voting.
Mature democracies all over the world provide for an absentee ballot for voters who cannot be in their electoral district on the day of an election. This option reflects the reality of modern life: Professional and recreational mobility and emergency services are part of the way we live. It is ridiculous to punish voters and lessen the representativeness of an electoral result by not offering an absentee ballot option.
Taiwan's electoral system requires voters to physically return to the place where they are registered as resident before they can vote. This colonial residue of social control in the Japanese and KMT White Terror eras is pointless and should be ditched.
But there are other reasons why the present arrangement is absurd. It discriminates against police, the military and other essential services whose members do not necessarily have the option of returning home to vote. It discriminates against anyone who must pay significant sums of money to return "home." It discriminates against rural areas, which are short-changed by having their absent voters silenced.
And given the prevalence of vote-buying, the system in effect discriminates in favor of voters in rural and remote areas who have to demonstrate by surreptitious means that their vote has not only been bought but also delivered.
The introduction of an absentee ballot would add a degree of complexity to the counting of votes. But such complexity is part and parcel of democratic mechanisms in other countries and should pose no challenge to a system as transparent as Taiwan's electoral mechanism.
This is a non-partisan issue. Even so, it is odd that the DPP should have pushed so hard to introduce electoral reform -- downsizing the legislature, redrawing electoral boundaries and limiting electorates to one legislator -- that was against its medium-term legislative interests, while at the same time showing little interest in empowering the arguably larger number of DPP voters who move to the metropolis from their rural base and do not or cannot return to vote.
The KMT, for its part, could gain some credibility as custodian of an adolescent democratic system by taking this matter seriously and moving to scrap this dinosaur-like restriction. Unfortunately, with the KMT dominating the legislature and a KMT member likely to be in the Presidential Office, it is difficult to see where the impetus for change might come from.
Why is Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) not a “happy camper” these days regarding Taiwan? Taiwanese have not become more “CCP friendly” in response to the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) use of spies and graft by the United Front Work Department, intimidation conducted by the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) and the Armed Police/Coast Guard, and endless subversive political warfare measures, including cyber-attacks, economic coercion, and diplomatic isolation. The percentage of Taiwanese that prefer the status quo or prefer moving towards independence continues to rise — 76 percent as of December last year. According to National Chengchi University (NCCU) polling, the Taiwanese
It would be absurd to claim to see a silver lining behind every US President Donald Trump cloud. Those clouds are too many, too dark and too dangerous. All the same, viewed from a domestic political perspective, there is a clear emerging UK upside to Trump’s efforts at crashing the post-Cold War order. It might even get a boost from Thursday’s Washington visit by British Prime Minister Keir Starmer. In July last year, when Starmer became prime minister, the Labour Party was rigidly on the defensive about Europe. Brexit was seen as an electorally unstable issue for a party whose priority
US President Donald Trump is systematically dismantling the network of multilateral institutions, organizations and agreements that have helped prevent a third world war for more than 70 years. Yet many governments are twisting themselves into knots trying to downplay his actions, insisting that things are not as they seem and that even if they are, confronting the menace in the White House simply is not an option. Disagreement must be carefully disguised to avoid provoking his wrath. For the British political establishment, the convenient excuse is the need to preserve the UK’s “special relationship” with the US. Following their White House
US President Donald Trump’s return to the White House has brought renewed scrutiny to the Taiwan-US semiconductor relationship with his claim that Taiwan “stole” the US chip business and threats of 100 percent tariffs on foreign-made processors. For Taiwanese and industry leaders, understanding those developments in their full context is crucial while maintaining a clear vision of Taiwan’s role in the global technology ecosystem. The assertion that Taiwan “stole” the US’ semiconductor industry fundamentally misunderstands the evolution of global technology manufacturing. Over the past four decades, Taiwan’s semiconductor industry, led by Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), has grown through legitimate means
RSS