The British Olympic Association (BOA) was forced into an embarrassing backflip this week after news emerged that athletes taking part in August's Beijing Olympics were being required to sign a pledge promising not to criticize host China over its human rights record.
After originally promising to leave athletes who spoke out against the Chinese government out of its squad, it will be interesting to see whether the BOA sticks to its promise to review its final athlete's agreement, especially now that a potential member of the squad -- top badminton player Richard Vaughan -- has spoken out against "Chinese inaction" against the ongoing violence in the Darfur region of Sudan.
Vaughan put the cat among the pigeons on Tuesday when he accused the Chinese government, a major sponsor of the regime in Khartoum, of doing little to stop the killing in the region, saying it was "very difficult to keep a polite silence about a conflict that continues to cost so many lives."
The controversy comes as human rights groups step up pressure over the Chinese government's failure to live up to promises it made when it bid to host the games in 2001.
Vaughan's comments are guaranteed to hit a raw nerve because China has already made several pre-emptive strikes in an attempt to head off criticism, saying it opposes the "politicizing of the Olympic Games." Indeed, Beijing is especially sensitive about endeavors that link its hosting of the Olympics with its support for the Sudanese government, something director Steven Spielberg did on Tuesday when he withdrew from his role as artistic adviser to the Games.
But the notion that the Beijing Games are anything other than a political vehicle for the Chinese Communist Party is laughable in itself. The idea that the Olympics would act as a force for political change and that hosting the Games would somehow help to bring down the authoritarian regime as it did in the build-up to the 1988 Games in Seoul has turned out to be pie in the sky, especially when one considers countries such as the UK, New Zealand and Belgium were or are willing to gag their athletes on Beijing's behalf.
The BOA's kowtowing to China comes in sharp contrast to comments made by UK Foreign Secretary David Miliband on Tuesday in a speech at Oxford University, where he told the audience that errors made in the pursuit of the "War on Terror" in Iraq and Afghanistan must not discourage British efforts to foster democracy -- by military means if necessary.
Miliband went on to say that China should recognize "that democracy is not a threat to stability but a way to guarantee it," adding democracy was the "best long-term defense against global terrorism and conflict."
Pity Miliband didn't talk like this when he entertained Chinese Foreign Minister Yang Jiechi (
One can only hope the British government will follow the BOA in its abrupt U-turn so that Taiwan can look forward to support from London instead of scorn as it strives to shore up the nation's defenses.
A high-school student surnamed Yang (楊) gained admissions to several prestigious medical schools recently. However, when Yang shared his “learning portfolio” on social media, he was caught exaggerating and even falsifying content, and his admissions were revoked. Now he has to take the “advanced subjects test” scheduled for next month. With his outstanding performance in the general scholastic ability test (GSAT), Yang successfully gained admissions to five prestigious medical schools. However, his university dreams have now been frustrated by the “flaws” in his learning portfolio. This is a wake-up call not only for students, but also teachers. Yang did make a big
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) concludes his fourth visit to China since leaving office, Taiwan finds itself once again trapped in a familiar cycle of political theater. The Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) has criticized Ma’s participation in the Straits Forum as “dancing with Beijing,” while the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) defends it as an act of constitutional diplomacy. Both sides miss a crucial point: The real question is not whether Ma’s visit helps or hurts Taiwan — it is why Taiwan lacks a sophisticated, multi-track approach to one of the most complex geopolitical relationships in the world. The disagreement reduces Taiwan’s
Former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) is visiting China, where he is addressed in a few ways, but never as a former president. On Sunday, he attended the Straits Forum in Xiamen, not as a former president of Taiwan, but as a former Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) chairman. There, he met with Chinese People’s Political Consultative Conference Chairman Wang Huning (王滬寧). Presumably, Wang at least would have been aware that Ma had once been president, and yet he did not mention that fact, referring to him only as “Mr Ma Ying-jeou.” Perhaps the apparent oversight was not intended to convey a lack of
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) last week announced that the KMT was launching “Operation Patriot” in response to an unprecedented massive campaign to recall 31 KMT legislators. However, his action has also raised questions and doubts: Are these so-called “patriots” pledging allegiance to the country or to the party? While all KMT-proposed campaigns to recall Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) lawmakers have failed, and a growing number of local KMT chapter personnel have been indicted for allegedly forging petition signatures, media reports said that at least 26 recall motions against KMT legislators have passed the second signature threshold