CHINA CONSIDERS this a "fruitful" year in terms of diplomacy, not least because, as the China Daily put it on Thursday, it "defeated Taiwan's attempt to join the WHO for the eleventh time."
But the questions remain: Is it really fruitful to block 23 million Taiwanese from full access to the most recent and important health information coming from abroad?
Is it fruitful to limit cooperation between the WHO and Taiwan by keeping the country outside the Global Outbreak Alert Response Network when the first few days of a disease outbreak are crucial to preventing a pandemic?
The answer is obviously "no."
In an interdependent world facing global issues, a diplomacy defending mostly national and political interest at the expense of global common interest cannot be considered fruitful. This "zero sum game diplomacy" is used by several countries in areas like environment and health, but it is neither beneficial nor responsible.
Thinking in terms of common interests instead of egoist ones, the health diplomacy of Taiwan this year could be considered fruitful.
In response to the serious health threats of malaria, diarrhea and Rift Valley fever in Kenya, Taiwan in January sent its third health mission to help authorities control the diseases by providing spraying equipment, medicine, mosquito nets and laboratory expertise.
Aware of the urgent need to work globally, Taiwan in July reached a consensus with the International Medical Assistance Foundation on efforts to prevent and control major international diseases such as avian flu, malaria, Rift Valley fever, brain fever and AIDS. In August, two days after an earthquake measuring 8 on the Richter scale killed 450 people in Peru, Taiwan sent an emergency medical relief team to treat and care for the injured and to provide food and other materials to the victims.
In October, Taiwan bolstered its cooperation with six Pacific allies (Kiribati, Marshall Islands, Nauru, Palau, Solomon Islands and Tuvalu) to improve medical service in the Pacific Ocean, notably by developing training exchange programs aimed at meeting the UN's Millennium Development Goals.
All of these examples of health diplomacy are fruitful in the sense that they're widely beneficial and work toward improving global health security. Nevertheless, this fruitfulness would be even greater and benefit even more people if Taiwan were able to fully participate in a global health that can ill afford to turn down a helping hand.
Vincent Rollet is a doctoral candidate in the Department of International Relations at the Institute of Political Science in Paris.
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its
When a recall campaign targeting the opposition Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislators was launched, something rather disturbing happened. According to reports, Hualien County Government officials visited several people to verify their signatures. Local authorities allegedly used routine or harmless reasons as an excuse to enter people’s house for investigation. The KMT launched its own recall campaigns, targeting Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) lawmakers, and began to collect signatures. It has been found that some of the KMT-headed counties and cities have allegedly been mobilizing municipal machinery. In Keelung, the director of the Department of Civil Affairs used the household registration system
RSS