Following the announcement last Friday that HSBC would take over The Chinese Bank, there is one obvious message that domestic banks may not like to hear: The four largest foreign banks in Taiwan -- ABN Amro, Citibank, HSBC and Standard Chartered -- have all expanded their presence here and are emerging as potential competitors in tapping the "Greater China" region.
Following two days of bidding and negotiation, HSBC agreed to rescue The Chinese Bank with the help of NT$47.5 billion (US$1.47 billion) in government funds. The acquisition will increase HSBC's local network from eight to 47 branches, helping it to compete with local and foreign rivals in Asia's fourth-largest banking market.
HSBC's move to bail out The Chinese Bank follows ABN Amro's acquisition of Taitung Business Bank in June, Citibank's take over of the Bank of Overseas Chinese in April and Standard Chartered's absorption of Hsinchu International Bank last year.
Taiwan's banking landscape has changed substantially over the past few years, after several domestic banks -- with government encouragement -- moved to acquire small and problematic lenders in a bid to compete with foreign rivals. Foreign private equity funds also played a role.
In October, for instance, Cathay Financial Holding won a government auction to take over China United Trust and Investment. In September, SAC Private Capital Group and GE Money announced they would inject capital into the Cosmos Bank. In July, a Carlyle Group-led consortium agreed to buy a nearly 37 percent stake in Ta Chong Bank. In June, Chinatrust Commercial Bank absorbed the Enterprise Bank of Hualien, while Longreach Group purchased a 51 percent stake in the EnTie Commercial Bank.
Other notable examples over the last few years include Shin Kong Financial Holding's inclusion of Macoto Bank under its financial umbrella, Taishin International Bank's acquisition of Chunan Credit Cooperative and Hsinchu Tenth Credit Cooperative, and the E.Sun Commercial Bank bail-out of the Kaohsiung Business Bank and the Union Bank of Taiwan's bail-out of Chung Shing Bank.
Despite that pace of consolidation, there are warning signs that the banking sector's efforts to sharpen its competitive edge are under pressure in the face of government flip-flops on issues such as disposal of state holdings in government-run banks.
Mega Financial Holding's attempt to drop plans to acquire smaller rival Taiwan Business Bank and the limited progress made in Taishin Financial Holding's merger with Chang Hwa Bank, among others, reflect just such concerns.
Nevertheless, this spate of foreign banks acquiring local lenders deserves wider attention as these global players are riding on a strong international network, global expertise and financial strength.
With the newly included local networks, these foreign banks will begin to embrace opportunities in retail, commercial and corporate banking that have until now been mostly covered by local peers.
In other words, these global players are expected to serve not only retail customers here but also provide services to small and medium size enterprises and large corporations doing business in China -- areas that local banks are restricted from because of national security concerns.
Whether or not these foreign banks will prevail in Taiwan, especially in wealth management in the Greater China region, remains to be seen. However, it becomes more likely if local banks fail to provide professional and tailor-made services, stop looking for merger targets to strengthen their market share and if the government fails to develop an appropriate mindset with regard to capital management by local banks.
A gap appears to be emerging between Washington’s foreign policy elites and the broader American public on how the United States should respond to China’s rise. From my vantage working at a think tank in Washington, DC, and through regular travel around the United States, I increasingly experience two distinct discussions. This divergence — between America’s elite hawkishness and public caution — may become one of the least appreciated and most consequential external factors influencing Taiwan’s security environment in the years ahead. Within the American policy community, the dominant view of China has grown unmistakably tough. Many members of Congress, as
After declaring Iran’s military “gone,” US President Donald Trump appealed to the UK, France, Japan and South Korea — as well as China, Iran’s strategic partner — to send minesweepers and naval forces to reopen the Strait of Hormuz. When allies balked, the request turned into a warning: NATO would face “a very bad” future if it refused. The prevailing wisdom is that Trump faces a credibility problem: having spent years insulting allies, he finds they would not rally when he needs them. That is true, but superficial, as though a structural collapse could be caused by wounded feelings. Something
Former Taipei mayor and Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) founding chairman Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) was sentenced to 17 years in prison on Thursday, making headlines across major media. However, another case linked to the TPP — the indictment of Chinese immigrant Xu Chunying (徐春鶯) for alleged violations of the Anti-Infiltration Act (反滲透法) on Tuesday — has also stirred up heated discussions. Born in Shanghai, Xu became a resident of Taiwan through marriage in 1993. Currently the director of the Taiwan New Immigrant Development Association, she was elected to serve as legislator-at-large for the TPP in 2023, but was later charged with involvement
Out of 64 participating universities in this year’s Stars Program — through which schools directly recommend their top students to universities for admission — only 19 filled their admissions quotas. There were 922 vacancies, down more than 200 from last year; top universities had 37 unfilled places, 40 fewer than last year. The original purpose of the Stars Program was to expand admissions to a wider range of students. However, certain departments at elite universities that failed to meet their admissions quotas are not improving. Vacancies at top universities are linked to students’ program preferences on their applications, but inappropriate admission