THE THIRD East Asia Summit (EAS) was held in Singapore last month. Following the example set in the previous two summits, Taiwan was again not invited.
The EAS included ASEAN, joined by China, Japan, South Korea and other countries. Issues discussed in this EAS covered conflict on the Korea Peninsula, climate change, the ongoing political crisis in Myanmar, regional economic integration and community awareness.
This annual gathering has touched upon issues with both political and economic dimensions that are of great concern to our country. Taiwan's absence indicates that the fear of being purposely excluded from the East Asian integration process is warranted.
The idea of East Asian integration was launched by Japan around 40 years ago. At that time, Japan tried to give East Asian self-awareness a wake-up call by adopting certain economic approaches.
Afraid of being sidelined due to its World War II aggression, Japan began to focus on strengthening its economic relations with developing countries in the region.
The concept of Asia-Pacific integration was also initiated by Japan, and the thought eventually gave birth to the Pacific Economic Cooperation Council (PECC) and later APEC. Japan used practical economic means to activate East Asian awareness. However, the beginning of Asia-Pacific integration was a political move disguised as a call for economic cooperation.
Efforts by the PECC and APEC have helped construct an Asia-Pacific cooperation model that, while not as mature as the EU, is slowly but surely moving toward its goal.
Meanwhile, the EAS has given power to an emerging East Asian integration arrangement that could and might challenge the Asia-Pacific model.
According to a report from the World Bank, "ASEAN plus three [China, Japan and South Korea]" will be able to give a boost to the real GDP growth of all contracting parties.
With such an economic incentive, East Asian awareness has been encouraged further. Given the fact that strong economic ties exist between Taiwan and other East Asian countries, the potential benefits could be further maximized if Taiwan was included in the process.
Unfortunately, Taiwan does not have a seat at the EAS table. Nevertheless, it has long been a dedicated member of both the PECC and APEC.
That means Taiwan is officially part of the Asia-Pacific cooperation model, regardless of whether it is able to take part in East Asian integration.
Through the simple rule of supply and demand, the current East Asian or Asia-Pacific frameworks have been serving as a foundation to support the global value chain.
When it comes to the global economic system, regional phenomena can easily start a chain reaction. To prevent disasters like the East Asian financial crisis from happening again, countries in this region should realize the significance of economic and financial cooperation.
However, Taiwan does not have many options to choose from. It also has to deal with more constraints than other neighboring countries when trying to optimize its position. Although Japan started the East Asian integration process, the process is now dominated by China.
What should Taiwan's strategy be in response to numerous external constraints like not being invited to the EAS and the risk of being marginalized from the East Asian integration process?
The situation for Taiwan is complicated, but the solution can be simple.
Taiwan should never mistake the existing constraints as all the variables in the equation. It needs to place greater emphasis on decisions that can be made by Taiwan.
Decisions over which Taiwan has no influence are external constraints. To further simplify my argument, Taiwan can stop paying so much attention to the East Asian integration process and EAS and instead focus more on relevant Asia-Pacific developments including the PECC, APEC and the potential Free Trade Area of the Asia-Pacific (FTAAP) region.
Lacking common roots, the idea of East Asian integration can only emerge if East Asians come to share a common vision of the future and are happy with their roles in such a vision.
But the current reality is that East Asia is still far from fulfilling that vision. On the other hand, the Asia-Pacific cooperation model is gradually becoming a reality. If opportunities for participation don't exist in one arena, Taiwan should allocate its valuable resources on feasible mechanisms.
Darson Chiu is an associate research fellow at the Taiwan Institute of Economic Research.
It is a good time to be in the air-conditioning business. As my colleagues at Bloomberg News write, an additional 1 billion cooling units are expected to be installed by the end of the decade. It is one of the main ways in which humans are adapting to more frequent and intense heatwaves. With a potentially strong El Nino on the horizon — a climate pattern that increases global temperatures — and greenhouse gas emissions still higher than ever, the world is facing another record-breaking summer, and another one, and another and so on. For many, owning an air conditioner has become a
Election seasons expose societal divisions and contrasting visions about the future of Taiwan. They also offer opportunities for leaders to forge unity around practical ideas for strengthening Taiwan’s resilience. Beijing has in the past sought to exacerbate divisions within Taiwan. For Beijing, a divided Taiwan is less likely to pursue permanent separation. It also is more manipulatable than a united Taiwan. A divided polity has lower trust in government institutions and diminished capacity to solve societal challenges. As my co-authors Richard Bush, Bonnie Glaser, and I recently wrote in our book US-Taiwan Relations: Will China’s Challenge Lead to a Crisis?, “Beijing wants
Taiwanese students spend thousands of hours studying English. Yet after three to five class-hours of English as a foreign language every week for more than nine years, most students can barely utter a sentence of English. The government’s “Bilingual Nation 2030” policy would do little to change this. As artificial intelligence (AI) technologies would soon be able to translate in real time, why should students squander so much of their youth and potential on learning a foreign language? AI might save students time, but it should not replace language learning. Instead, the technology could amplify learning, and it might also enhance
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) has nominated New Taipei City Mayor Hou You-yi (侯友宜) as its candidate for next year’s presidential election. The selection process was replete with controversy, mainly because the KMT has never stipulated a set of protocols for its presidential nominations. Yet, viewed from a historical perspective, the KMT has improved to some extent. There are two fundamental differences between the KMT and the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP): First, the DPP believes that the Republic of China on Taiwan is a sovereign country with independent autonomy, meaning that Taiwan and China are two different entities. The KMT, on the
RSS