Recent developments have again belied Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) presidential candidate Ma Ying-jeou's (
Ma has been running on these themes for months now, taking great pains to paint an economy with a healthy growth rate as stagnant and to blame every problem under the sun on the past seven years of Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) governance.
A vote for Ma, he says, is a vote for the underdog and a sure-fire path to a brighter future.
But all the promises of rejuvenating every single industry and sector in the economy and ensuring the well-being of every citizen under his care pale compared with the time-honored KMT tradition of placing party interests above everything else.
The latest example? Ma's party has placed a draft amendment to the Organic Law of the Central Election Commission (CEC) (
It seems the pan-blue dominated legislature, so well-versed in the art of ignoring important bills, can move fast when it wants to.
But don't expect anything other than the usual tomorrow -- in other words, yet another blocked bill. The KMT is determined to address the draft amendment, but several DPP lawmakers are just as determined to prevent that from happening and told the pan-blue camp it would have to pass the amendment "over our dead bodies."
If the KMT caucus really cared about economic development and the public good, it would put non-controversial bills at the top of the agenda tomorrow before the circus begins.
Otherwise, bills that really affect the nation's development won't so much as pass the legislative speaker's lips.
Several draft amendments to the Statute for Upgrading Industries (
But instead of getting any work done, tomorrow the legislature will treat the public to the latest chapter in the increasingly absurd spat over election procedures.
If the pan-blue camp passes the amendment, which would require commission members to be selected according to the number of legislative seats held by each party instead of being nominated by the premier and appointed by the president, it will hold the majority on the commission. That would give the KMT the means to work against all DPP-initiated referendums, including the plebiscite on recovering the KMT's stolen assets.
If actions speak louder than words, then Ma's pledges won't go very far. The KMT's performance on the legislative floor is likely to erode his credibility once more.
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
If you had a vision of the future where China did not dominate the global car industry, you can kiss those dreams goodbye. That is because US President Donald Trump’s promised 25 percent tariff on auto imports takes an ax to the only bits of the emerging electric vehicle (EV) supply chain that are not already dominated by Beijing. The biggest losers when the levies take effect this week would be Japan and South Korea. They account for one-third of the cars imported into the US, and as much as two-thirds of those imported from outside North America. (Mexico and Canada, while
I have heard people equate the government’s stance on resisting forced unification with China or the conditional reinstatement of the military court system with the rise of the Nazis before World War II. The comparison is absurd. There is no meaningful parallel between the government and Nazi Germany, nor does such a mindset exist within the general public in Taiwan. It is important to remember that the German public bore some responsibility for the horrors of the Holocaust. Post-World War II Germany’s transitional justice efforts were rooted in a national reckoning and introspection. Many Jews were sent to concentration camps not
RSS