ON OCT. 19, the Ministry of Economic Affairs' Investment Commission said the total amount of Taiwanese investments in China between January and September this year was US$6.85 billion.
This means that Taiwan was investing an average of NT$24.58 billion (US$761 million) per month in China during this period -- an increase of 28.8 percent compared with the same period last year. This does not include small and medium enterprise investments, individual investment in Chinese real estate or stock markets, or expenses for traveling, studying and other purposes.
To attract Taiwanese businesspeople away from China to return to investing in Taiwan, the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) government has offered NT$200 billion in financing loans, preferential land rental and the "Big Investment, Big Warmth" project.
From May 2002 to May last year, a total of 48 Taiwanese companies had returned, and their investments were estimated at NT$26.29 billion, with an annual output value of NT$31.55 billion, creating 5,258 jobs. But if we divide that by 48 months, the monthly investment was only NT$448 million, or about 1.8 percent of the capital invested monthly in China.
Since the government is unwilling to "suit the remedy to the illness" and refuses to differentiate wage standards for local and foreign workers, Taiwanese businesspeople choose not to come back so as not to damage their international competitiveness.
Unfortunately, not only has DPP presidential candidate Frank Hsieh (
So can Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) presidential candidate Ma Ying-jeou (
Will such policies have an immediate effect? He promises to increase the number of Chinese tourists from 1,000 per day to 10,000 per day within four years if elected.
Even if Taiwan's hotels and facilities are capable of accommodating them all, how profitable can it be?
According to travel agency statistics, the average daily expenditure of a Chinese tourist in Taiwan is about US$30. Thus, the monthly expenditure will be NT$300 million.
The Tourism Bureau hopes the figure will increase from US$30 to US$100 per day. But even so, monthly expenditure will only increase to NT$1 billion, still insignificant compared to the money Taiwan invests in China every month.
Foreign investors come to Taiwan just to make money. With Taiwan's constantly declining competitiveness, Taiwanese businesspeople can hardly return and make a profit, and foreign investors can hardly stay as massive domestic capital is remitted to investment in overseas securities.
All this reflects one fact: There is really not too much to invest in in Taiwan, as it is difficult to profit here. Then how can Hsieh and Ma be sure that Chinese companies will come and invest?
The opening of direct cross-strait links and the lifting of the investment ceiling on China-bound investment are certainly convenient to Taiwanese businesspeople, and helps them find greater business opportunities and international competitiveness.
Still, what good will it do Taiwan? Can it create more jobs here? Can it increase the government's tax revenues? Can it improve public order and prosperity? Can it narrow the income gap? And more importantly, can it increase the nation's international competitiveness?
The answer is a resounding "no."
These measures will have the opposite effect to their intent.
The above analysis tells us that Taiwan is bleeding heavily.
Whoever stops this bleeding by reducing investment in China, or whoever transfuses more blood to Taiwan by attracting greater foreign investment to balance Taiwanese investments in China can save Taiwan.
Today, both Hsieh and Ma are incapable of achieving these goals, yet they are our only choices.
Isn't it sad?
William Kao is chairman of the Victims of Investment in China Association.
Translated by Eddy Chang
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) met with a delegation from the Hoover Institution, a think tank based at Stanford University in California, to discuss strengthening US-Taiwan relations and enhancing peace and stability in the region. The delegation was led by James Ellis Jr, co-chair of the institution’s Taiwan in the Indo-Pacific Region project and former commander of the US Strategic Command. It also included former Australian minister for foreign affairs Marise Payne, influential US academics and other former policymakers. Think tank diplomacy is an important component of Taiwan’s efforts to maintain high-level dialogue with other nations with which it does
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers
RSS