ON OCT. 19, the Ministry of Economic Affairs' Investment Commission said the total amount of Taiwanese investments in China between January and September this year was US$6.85 billion.
This means that Taiwan was investing an average of NT$24.58 billion (US$761 million) per month in China during this period -- an increase of 28.8 percent compared with the same period last year. This does not include small and medium enterprise investments, individual investment in Chinese real estate or stock markets, or expenses for traveling, studying and other purposes.
To attract Taiwanese businesspeople away from China to return to investing in Taiwan, the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) government has offered NT$200 billion in financing loans, preferential land rental and the "Big Investment, Big Warmth" project.
From May 2002 to May last year, a total of 48 Taiwanese companies had returned, and their investments were estimated at NT$26.29 billion, with an annual output value of NT$31.55 billion, creating 5,258 jobs. But if we divide that by 48 months, the monthly investment was only NT$448 million, or about 1.8 percent of the capital invested monthly in China.
Since the government is unwilling to "suit the remedy to the illness" and refuses to differentiate wage standards for local and foreign workers, Taiwanese businesspeople choose not to come back so as not to damage their international competitiveness.
Unfortunately, not only has DPP presidential candidate Frank Hsieh (
So can Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) presidential candidate Ma Ying-jeou (
Will such policies have an immediate effect? He promises to increase the number of Chinese tourists from 1,000 per day to 10,000 per day within four years if elected.
Even if Taiwan's hotels and facilities are capable of accommodating them all, how profitable can it be?
According to travel agency statistics, the average daily expenditure of a Chinese tourist in Taiwan is about US$30. Thus, the monthly expenditure will be NT$300 million.
The Tourism Bureau hopes the figure will increase from US$30 to US$100 per day. But even so, monthly expenditure will only increase to NT$1 billion, still insignificant compared to the money Taiwan invests in China every month.
Foreign investors come to Taiwan just to make money. With Taiwan's constantly declining competitiveness, Taiwanese businesspeople can hardly return and make a profit, and foreign investors can hardly stay as massive domestic capital is remitted to investment in overseas securities.
All this reflects one fact: There is really not too much to invest in in Taiwan, as it is difficult to profit here. Then how can Hsieh and Ma be sure that Chinese companies will come and invest?
The opening of direct cross-strait links and the lifting of the investment ceiling on China-bound investment are certainly convenient to Taiwanese businesspeople, and helps them find greater business opportunities and international competitiveness.
Still, what good will it do Taiwan? Can it create more jobs here? Can it increase the government's tax revenues? Can it improve public order and prosperity? Can it narrow the income gap? And more importantly, can it increase the nation's international competitiveness?
The answer is a resounding "no."
These measures will have the opposite effect to their intent.
The above analysis tells us that Taiwan is bleeding heavily.
Whoever stops this bleeding by reducing investment in China, or whoever transfuses more blood to Taiwan by attracting greater foreign investment to balance Taiwanese investments in China can save Taiwan.
Today, both Hsieh and Ma are incapable of achieving these goals, yet they are our only choices.
Isn't it sad?
William Kao is chairman of the Victims of Investment in China Association.
Translated by Eddy Chang
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its
RSS