HUNDREDS of students from Taichung's Beitun Elementary School were recently infected with dysentery, which the Department of Health confirmed was the largest dysentery outbreak in 10 years. The health department found that the cause of the outbreak was a leak from the school's septic tank into the groundwater supply.
From this case, investigations revealed that due to geographic, economic and other factors, nearly 200 of the nation's 3,300 elementary and secondary schools do not have tap water. This apparently accidental incident stands in stark contrast to the recent assessment by the World Economic Forum that the quality of health and primary education of Taiwanese students has improved in the global rankings. Furthermore, it demonstrates that there is a severe lack of basic infrastructure at secondary and elementary schools and that the quality of their education is a cause for concern.
Although for many years Taiwan's education budget in proportion to GNP has been comparable to other developed countries. But due to the budget system, the sum allotted to various secondary and elementary schools has been minuscule.
First, there is the problem of the overall budgeting scheme. Taking the contamination of groundwater as an example -- although in past years, budgets devised by the national government have designated funds for improving water quality -- these funds have not necessarily been used for their specified purpose at the local level. This is mainly due to the fact that allocated funds have no specified purpose, or that the range of purposes are too flexible. Hence various local governments commandeer the funds for other uses.
Policy makers only emphasize that the educational funds in budgets drafted by various levels of government are calculated according to the Compilation and Administration of Educational Expenditures Act (
However, they disregard Article 5 of the Educational Fundamental Act (
Many education professionals point out that current education policies have moved from the original ideal of diversification to being one dimensional, while subsidies have become dictatorial. As base level schools need funding, they can only cooperate with the policy without objection.
Second, education funding often becomes misappropriated, as in school lunches. The Ministry of Education has provided special funds for school lunches in response to the rising number of destitute families. However, in some areas the funds have been used to subsidize kitchen staff salaries or purchase equipment, resulting in tens of thousands of school children going without lunch.
Compared to other developed countries, the lack of available funds makes classroom conditions and hygiene standards unsatisfactory. Even the children's drinking water is problematic.
Many education policies emphasize formalities while lacking a complete set of curricular components and evaluation mechanisms.
For instance, years ago the government proposed a ban on corporal punishment in schools, but did not offer counseling for staff. Other cases included promoting technological education in classrooms with no electrical outlets, promoting digital education without computers and promoting language classes without the necessary resources. Currently Taiwan is filled with policy-driven teachers' workshops, which do more harm than good.
These repeated failures of investment show that the physical fitness, health, eyesight, character and even the learning motivation of this generation of children are declining annually.
Only academic pressure is on the rise. What did the educational reforms praised for raising the level of every child really change? Why are educational resources in Taiwan still dogged by problems of deficiency and inadequacy?
The current case of dysentery infection in Taichung is only the tip of the iceberg. If educational funding is not critically reviewed, similar problems will reoccur.
Prudence Chou is a professor of education at National Chengchi University and the convener of the educational section of the Taiwan Competitiveness Forum.
Translated by Angela Hong
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
If you had a vision of the future where China did not dominate the global car industry, you can kiss those dreams goodbye. That is because US President Donald Trump’s promised 25 percent tariff on auto imports takes an ax to the only bits of the emerging electric vehicle (EV) supply chain that are not already dominated by Beijing. The biggest losers when the levies take effect this week would be Japan and South Korea. They account for one-third of the cars imported into the US, and as much as two-thirds of those imported from outside North America. (Mexico and Canada, while
I have heard people equate the government’s stance on resisting forced unification with China or the conditional reinstatement of the military court system with the rise of the Nazis before World War II. The comparison is absurd. There is no meaningful parallel between the government and Nazi Germany, nor does such a mindset exist within the general public in Taiwan. It is important to remember that the German public bore some responsibility for the horrors of the Holocaust. Post-World War II Germany’s transitional justice efforts were rooted in a national reckoning and introspection. Many Jews were sent to concentration camps not
RSS