PRESIDENT Chen Shui-bian (
Even worse, there are those, like Kuan Hsiu-chin (
It has been 10 years since prostitution became criminalized. As everyone knows, Taiwan's sex industry has not since vanished. These destitute streetwalkers have to run from the police, and are often controlled by criminal gangs or forced to provide sexual services to police officers for free.
Meanwhile, public representatives, supported by money from taxpayers, can saunter blatantly into "bars" or "hospitality houses" and publicly engage in extramarital affairs after they legislate laws that the public are expected to follow.
Licensed prostitution once provided an outlet for the sexual desires of laborers and the lonely, allowing them to find solace in the coldest and most inhospitable cities.
The Taiwan Solidarity Union (TSU) recently said they would aim to the center-left of the political playing field. During television appearances, senior members emphasize that the TSU will care especially for the middle class and the disadvantaged. In reality, this is more claptrap aimed at winning the applause of the public with impressive words.
The values and interests of the middle and lower classes frequently clash, and the abolition of licensed prostitution is a classic example. Even so, middle class feminists have been hopeful that the unjust law, which prosecutes prostitutes but not their clients, can be changed to punish both parties. Yet this completely ignores the current social climate in Taiwan, and merely adds another law that contrives to do good while further oppressing the lower classes.
For the coming elections, the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) and the TSU each put together a list of legislators-at-large headed by candidates known for their focus on social-welfare, trying to emphasize that their party cares for the destitute. Indeed, no one would disagree that those with physical disabilities require the care of focused resources from the government.
By comparison, how is it that those who hide miserably in dark alleys and streets do not even have the right to a means of livelihood? If political parties only choose to confront non-controversial issues, to win votes based on topics on which there is already a consensus, then all parties must congregate toward the center, and vie for the support of the middle class. Then who will articulate the needs of those at the bottom of the social ladder?
If the people are to believe that "center left" is not an empty slogan, the TSU must find a route divergent from the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the DPP's tendencies toward populism and their habit of huddling where the capital clusters. Why not propose a refreshing new political platform?
Whether the sex industry should be legalized is an issue that incites conservatism from the pan-blue camp and evasive dodging from the pan-green camp, and will certainly be a high benchmark for whether their route is truly left leaning.
Cheng Wei-chun is a lecturer at Banciao Community University and a member of the Shih Hsin University Street Persons' Workshop.
Translated by Angela Hong
Why is Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) not a “happy camper” these days regarding Taiwan? Taiwanese have not become more “CCP friendly” in response to the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) use of spies and graft by the United Front Work Department, intimidation conducted by the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) and the Armed Police/Coast Guard, and endless subversive political warfare measures, including cyber-attacks, economic coercion, and diplomatic isolation. The percentage of Taiwanese that prefer the status quo or prefer moving towards independence continues to rise — 76 percent as of December last year. According to National Chengchi University (NCCU) polling, the Taiwanese
It would be absurd to claim to see a silver lining behind every US President Donald Trump cloud. Those clouds are too many, too dark and too dangerous. All the same, viewed from a domestic political perspective, there is a clear emerging UK upside to Trump’s efforts at crashing the post-Cold War order. It might even get a boost from Thursday’s Washington visit by British Prime Minister Keir Starmer. In July last year, when Starmer became prime minister, the Labour Party was rigidly on the defensive about Europe. Brexit was seen as an electorally unstable issue for a party whose priority
US President Donald Trump is systematically dismantling the network of multilateral institutions, organizations and agreements that have helped prevent a third world war for more than 70 years. Yet many governments are twisting themselves into knots trying to downplay his actions, insisting that things are not as they seem and that even if they are, confronting the menace in the White House simply is not an option. Disagreement must be carefully disguised to avoid provoking his wrath. For the British political establishment, the convenient excuse is the need to preserve the UK’s “special relationship” with the US. Following their White House
US President Donald Trump’s return to the White House has brought renewed scrutiny to the Taiwan-US semiconductor relationship with his claim that Taiwan “stole” the US chip business and threats of 100 percent tariffs on foreign-made processors. For Taiwanese and industry leaders, understanding those developments in their full context is crucial while maintaining a clear vision of Taiwan’s role in the global technology ecosystem. The assertion that Taiwan “stole” the US’ semiconductor industry fundamentally misunderstands the evolution of global technology manufacturing. Over the past four decades, Taiwan’s semiconductor industry, led by Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), has grown through legitimate means
RSS