For more than a decade, Taiwanese have been calling for political groups to pull out of the media. Despite the fact that, back in 2003, amendments to the Radio and Television Act (
The inability of political parties and media outlets to disassociate themselves from each other deserves a reprimand.
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Legislator Alex Tsai's (
Looking back, since Taiwan allowed the opening of the fourth wireless TV station in 1994, followed by cable and satellite TV, the quantity of TV channels has increased substantially.
But the media do not represent the full spectrum of political views. Rather, everything is either green or blue. In the wireless TV market, the chairman of FTV also happened to be a Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) legislator. CTV shares, meanwhile, were reluctantly transferred from the KMT to a pro-KMT newspaper owner, resulting in a cross-media conglomerate with complete disregard for regulations.
In satellite TV, various news channels have allied themselves with political parties and have served as enthusiastic cheerleaders for everything from internal party elections, presidential elections, important legal cases and public demonstrations.
The law clearly states that parties and politicians are not allowed to invest in or operate media outlets. But that is only at the most basic level. Politics and media are still making passes at one another. Not only should politicians not interfere with the media, but the media should also know its own limits.
While the media reforms engendered a great deal of interest, the supposedly freer media have become increasingly partisan. This is not only the result of the ideology of the owners and managers in charge of media corporations, but also commercial considerations.
No wonder former Eastern Broadcasting Co chairman Gary Wang (
TV stations are still stuck in the morass of pan-blue and pan-green affiliations. This threatens to undermine the freedoms that democratization has brought and skirts the media's responsibility to serve as the public conscience.
Many people who are well informed on the situation have run out of patience and have tried to give rise to a third force.
The media should show self-restraint, as should parties and politicians. Taiwan already forbids political forces to interfere with the media or public education. If parties and politicians are concerned with the development of the media, then in the lead-up to the elections they should make a commitment to fashion an environment that favors reasonable control over commercial TV channels and grant public channels sufficient resources to successfully develop without the need to rely on political parties.
The public and commercial media outlets must be allowed to compete over quality and the media industry should accept its social responsibilities. For their part, politicians should be prevented at all costs from meddling in the media for short-term gain.
Hung Chen-ling is an assistant professor at National Taiwan University's Graduate Institute of Journalism.
Translated by Angela Hong and Anna Stiggelbout
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its
RSS