Cabinet Secretary-General Chen Chin-jun (
Close to one month has elapsed since the Cabinet made the announcement, and yet there has been no sign of a follow-up on the matter -- with the notable exception of a TV spot featuring Government Information Office Minister Shieh Jhy-wey (謝志偉) calling on the electorate to take part in the DPP-initiated referendum on reclaiming the KMT's "stolen assets" and waxing on the benefits of doing so. He said the money would be used to pay for schoolchildren's lunches and as tuition subsidies for children from low-income households.
Amid the seeming DPP idleness, the KMT, meanwhile, seems to having embarked on a joy ride thanks to its abundant party resources. Since the KMT national congress' formal endorsement in June of Ma Ying-jeou (
Last month alone, the KMT rolled out at least four TV spots that were aired several times a day on a number of TV channels.
One wonders how much the KMT must have paid to produce these lengthy TV promotions, as well as what the cost must have been to buy such a number of TV commercial slots.
It is no secret that the KMT has been selling its assets. What's truly horrifying is the thought that the KMT may now be selling assets it stole from the people to fund its bid to regain power.
The DPP, however, also bears some of the blame. Whenever elections approach, the DPP starts calling for the assets stolen by the KMT to be reclaimed. That, in and of itself, is unimpeachable. What is deplorable is the fact that once the ballots have been cast and the elections have been concluded, all that noise about the stolen assets turns to an eerie silence.
The DPP government's repeated inability or unwillingness to follow through on its commitment to giving back to the people what is theirs has led to disappointment. Some, perhaps not unfairly, have even questioned if it is genuinely committed to achieving justice on that front.
As next month's legislative elections and the presidential election in March draw closer, the pitch of the DPP's call on the KMT to return the stolen assets will once again increase.
What will be interesting to see is whether this time around the request is more than just an electoral ploy.
Crying wolf might not be the best way to describe the DPP's use of the KMT stolen assets issue at election time. But the underlying principle is the same: If, through repetition and inaction, people start thinking they are being taken for fools, the DPP's message could very well turn against it and serve instead as a means to highlight its insincerity.
In a stark reminder of China’s persistent territorial overreach, Pema Wangjom Thongdok, a woman from Arunachal Pradesh holding an Indian passport, was detained for 18 hours at Shanghai Pudong Airport on Nov. 24 last year. Chinese immigration officials allegedly informed her that her passport was “invalid” because she was “Chinese,” refusing to recognize her Indian citizenship and claiming Arunachal Pradesh as part of South Tibet. Officials had insisted that Thongdok, an Indian-origin UK resident traveling for a conference, was not Indian despite her valid documents. India lodged a strong diplomatic protest, summoning the Chinese charge d’affaires in Delhi and demanding
Immediately after the Chinese People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) “Justice Mission” exercise at the end of last year, a question was posed to Indian Ministry of External Affairs spokesperson Randhir Jaiswal regarding recent developments involving the exercises around Taiwan, and how he viewed their impact on regional peace and stability. His answer was somewhat perplexing to me as a curious student of Taiwanese affairs. “India closely follows developments across the Indo-Pacific region,” he said, adding: “We have an abiding interest in peace and stability in the region, in view of our significant trade, economic, people-to-people, and maritime interests. We urge all concerned
In the past 72 hours, US Senators Roger Wicker, Dan Sullivan and Ruben Gallego took to social media to publicly rebuke the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) over the defense budget. I understand that Taiwan’s head is on the chopping block, and the urgency of its security situation cannot be overstated. However, the comments from Wicker, Sullivan and Gallego suggest they have fallen victim to a sophisticated disinformation campaign orchestrated by an administration in Taipei that treats national security as a partisan weapon. The narrative fed to our allies claims the opposition is slashing the defense budget to kowtow to the Chinese
In a Taipei Times editorial published almost three years ago (“Macron goes off-piste,” April 13, 2023, page 8), French President Emmanuel Macron was criticized for comments he made immediately after meeting Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) in Beijing. Macron had spoken of the need for his country to find a path on Chinese foreign policy no longer aligned with that of the US, saying that continuing to follow the US agenda would sacrifice the EU’s strategic autonomy. At the time, Macron was criticized for gifting Xi a PR coup, and the editorial said that he had been “persuaded to run
RSS