The human rights of the world's poorest people will be violated unless Britain and other developed countries accept the need for drastic and immediate steps to prevent global warming from triggering dangerous climate change, the UN warned on Tuesday.
Calling for urgent action on a post-Kyoto agreement to reduce greenhouse gases, the UN said the risks of "ecological catastrophe" were rising and called on the West to adopt policies that would cut carbon emissions by almost a third by 2020, and by at least 80 percent by 2050.
Kevin Watkins, editor of the near-400-page human development report, said at its launch in Brazil that climate change was about more than science or economics.
"It is about social justice and the human rights of the world's poor and marginalized. Failure to act on climate change would be tantamount to a systematic violation of the human rights of the poor," he said.
The report is critical of all developed countries for their performance on cutting emissions. But it singled out the British government for failing to show enough ambition in its plan to combat greenhouse gases, citing the upward trend in emissions from the energy and transport sectors and the lack of progress in developing renewable sources of energy.
UK International Development Secretary Douglas Alexander said: "This report highlights the scale and urgency of the problem.
"The effects of climate change will hit the world's poorest hardest. If we don't tackle climate change now, we will struggle to help the world's poor build a better life for themselves and their children."
`RADICAL NEW POLICIES'
While praising the UK government for a "bold and innovative" climate change bill that would legally bind ministers to mandatory cuts in emissions, the UN said "radical new policies" -- such as carbon taxes, tougher regulations to phase out coal-fired power stations and higher vehicle excise duty for gas-guzzling cars -- would be needed if Britain was to have any chance of hitting its target of cutting carbon dioxide emissions by 26 percent to 32 percent by 2020.
There were "serious questions about the level of ambition, and about the UK's capacity to meet its own carbon reduction targets."
The report comes barely a week after British Prime Minister Gordon Brown said Britain was committed to the EU target of a 20 percent cut in carbon emissions by 2020 and a 20 percent use of renewables for energy by the same date.
In the summer the Guardian uncovered government documents saying the 20 percent target was unachievable and ways should be found to undermine it at a European level.
The UN report said that: "Britain also lags far behind best EU practice on renewable energy: it currently produces only 2 percent of its overall energy from renewables."
Climate change has moved up the political agenda in Britain, with the government seeking to find ways of cutting greenhouse gas emissions without harming prospects for economic growth. Ministers believe that a mix of energy sources, including nuclear and renewables, will be needed in the future and that greater fuel efficiency in aviation can offset the impact of the expansion of Heathrow.
The UN report criticized the government for excluding shipping and aviation from the UK's target. Taken together, the UN said, the two sources of greenhouse gases would increase the UK's carbon budget by 27 percent by 2050, canceling out half of the planned 60 percent reduction.
"Emissions targets in the climate bill are not consistent with the objective of avoiding dangerous climate change," it said. "If the rest of the developed world followed the pathway envisaged in the UK's climate change bill, dangerous climate change would be inevitable."
OUTCOME
The outcome, the UN said, would be greenhouse gas concentrations rising to 660 parts per million (ppm) to 750ppm by 2050, giving possible global temperature increases of 4oC to 5oC, well above the 450ppm and 2oC temperature rise that experts say warming must be kept within.
The report said that the UK was on track to meet its Kyoto Protocol targets because emissions are 5 percent lower than in 1990, the base year. But it says all the reductions were achieved before 2000. Now coal consumption in power generation is rising again and carbon emissions have been increasing since 2000.
"The upshot is that the national target of reducing CO2 emissions to 20 percent below 1990 levels by 2010 is unattainable; the likely outcome is a reduction less than one-half this target," it said.
The report said the UK should phase out highly polluting power stations and rapidly increase the use of renewable energy, particularly wind and tidal power, and consider higher fuel taxes and vehicle excise duty as a way of curbing the use of heavily polluting cars.
It also said that energy use in British homes remained "highly inefficient," with the average house using four times as much energy as new ones. This offered a big opportunity for carbon reductions, it added.
"Rising emissions from transport also reflect weaknesses in the public transport infrastructure and a decline in the cost of private transport, relative to public transport," the report said.
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS