The human rights of the world's poorest people will be violated unless Britain and other developed countries accept the need for drastic and immediate steps to prevent global warming from triggering dangerous climate change, the UN warned on Tuesday.
Calling for urgent action on a post-Kyoto agreement to reduce greenhouse gases, the UN said the risks of "ecological catastrophe" were rising and called on the West to adopt policies that would cut carbon emissions by almost a third by 2020, and by at least 80 percent by 2050.
Kevin Watkins, editor of the near-400-page human development report, said at its launch in Brazil that climate change was about more than science or economics.
"It is about social justice and the human rights of the world's poor and marginalized. Failure to act on climate change would be tantamount to a systematic violation of the human rights of the poor," he said.
The report is critical of all developed countries for their performance on cutting emissions. But it singled out the British government for failing to show enough ambition in its plan to combat greenhouse gases, citing the upward trend in emissions from the energy and transport sectors and the lack of progress in developing renewable sources of energy.
UK International Development Secretary Douglas Alexander said: "This report highlights the scale and urgency of the problem.
"The effects of climate change will hit the world's poorest hardest. If we don't tackle climate change now, we will struggle to help the world's poor build a better life for themselves and their children."
`RADICAL NEW POLICIES'
While praising the UK government for a "bold and innovative" climate change bill that would legally bind ministers to mandatory cuts in emissions, the UN said "radical new policies" -- such as carbon taxes, tougher regulations to phase out coal-fired power stations and higher vehicle excise duty for gas-guzzling cars -- would be needed if Britain was to have any chance of hitting its target of cutting carbon dioxide emissions by 26 percent to 32 percent by 2020.
There were "serious questions about the level of ambition, and about the UK's capacity to meet its own carbon reduction targets."
The report comes barely a week after British Prime Minister Gordon Brown said Britain was committed to the EU target of a 20 percent cut in carbon emissions by 2020 and a 20 percent use of renewables for energy by the same date.
In the summer the Guardian uncovered government documents saying the 20 percent target was unachievable and ways should be found to undermine it at a European level.
The UN report said that: "Britain also lags far behind best EU practice on renewable energy: it currently produces only 2 percent of its overall energy from renewables."
Climate change has moved up the political agenda in Britain, with the government seeking to find ways of cutting greenhouse gas emissions without harming prospects for economic growth. Ministers believe that a mix of energy sources, including nuclear and renewables, will be needed in the future and that greater fuel efficiency in aviation can offset the impact of the expansion of Heathrow.
The UN report criticized the government for excluding shipping and aviation from the UK's target. Taken together, the UN said, the two sources of greenhouse gases would increase the UK's carbon budget by 27 percent by 2050, canceling out half of the planned 60 percent reduction.
"Emissions targets in the climate bill are not consistent with the objective of avoiding dangerous climate change," it said. "If the rest of the developed world followed the pathway envisaged in the UK's climate change bill, dangerous climate change would be inevitable."
OUTCOME
The outcome, the UN said, would be greenhouse gas concentrations rising to 660 parts per million (ppm) to 750ppm by 2050, giving possible global temperature increases of 4oC to 5oC, well above the 450ppm and 2oC temperature rise that experts say warming must be kept within.
The report said that the UK was on track to meet its Kyoto Protocol targets because emissions are 5 percent lower than in 1990, the base year. But it says all the reductions were achieved before 2000. Now coal consumption in power generation is rising again and carbon emissions have been increasing since 2000.
"The upshot is that the national target of reducing CO2 emissions to 20 percent below 1990 levels by 2010 is unattainable; the likely outcome is a reduction less than one-half this target," it said.
The report said the UK should phase out highly polluting power stations and rapidly increase the use of renewable energy, particularly wind and tidal power, and consider higher fuel taxes and vehicle excise duty as a way of curbing the use of heavily polluting cars.
It also said that energy use in British homes remained "highly inefficient," with the average house using four times as much energy as new ones. This offered a big opportunity for carbon reductions, it added.
"Rising emissions from transport also reflect weaknesses in the public transport infrastructure and a decline in the cost of private transport, relative to public transport," the report said.
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its
RSS