I have to address two "issues" that have been really annoying me over the last couple of weeks.
The first issue is the Tong-yong vs. Pinyin Romanization system. Both of these are designed for foreigners and not for native Chinese speakers. The problem I have is the disregard policy makers have toward the target audience -- people like me who live here and those who visit here for short periods at a time.
Here is the problem: You are not using the system correctly and therefore it is absolutely impossible to read it so stop using it. Don't use it in passports or roadsigns or anywhere unless you are going to do it correctly.
One down, two points to go. Anyone who studies Chinese usually learns Pinyin, so we all know it. Tongyong is designed to be used by people who have not studied Chinese, but the person would still not be able to pronounce the word correctly because they would not know which tone to use.
Maybe the powers that be should stop attracting new foreigners to Taiwan and start looking after those of us who have made this country their home. Can we vote on it in a phonetics referendum? I vote Pinyin and so does every other person I know who has been living here for more than a year and has studied some Chinese.
The second issue involves the comments in another recent article ("Disparities plague English classes," Nov. 12, page 2). If a student doesn't know how to do addition and subtraction in math class, he should not be studying algebra and a student who knows algebra very well should not be studying basic addition and subtraction.
They should be in separate classes and if they are not you are wasting the money of those who pay for an education and you are wasting the time of educators who actually care to teach and not just pop into Taiwan for a short-term working holiday.
The problem is that the majority of teachers who teach English have no idea if they are teaching correct or incorrect English. They are either wrong out of ignorance, or they have no choice other than to guess. This applies to teachers from elementary school all the way up. They don't care if the students are in similar or different classes. Those that do and can actually teach are just caught up in the system.
The only reason I care is because you are confusing students and making them negative about learning English or Chinese.
I have a student who corrected her elementary school teacher when she said "a pear and a peach are the same thing when translated into Chinese." This student was punished for "interrupting" the teacher. That falls into the "retarded" category.
Let's get this organized and start caring about what English and Chinese students achieve more than our own egos.
Gerhard Erasmus
Yonghe, Taipei County
As Taiwan’s domestic political crisis deepens, the opposition Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) have proposed gutting the country’s national spending, with steep cuts to the critical foreign and defense ministries. While the blue-white coalition alleges that it is merely responding to voters’ concerns about corruption and mismanagement, of which there certainly has been plenty under Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) and KMT-led governments, the rationales for their proposed spending cuts lay bare the incoherent foreign policy of the KMT-led coalition. Introduced on the eve of US President Donald Trump’s inauguration, the KMT’s proposed budget is a terrible opening
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus in the Legislative Yuan has made an internal decision to freeze NT$1.8 billion (US$54.7 million) of the indigenous submarine project’s NT$2 billion budget. This means that up to 90 percent of the budget cannot be utilized. It would only be accessible if the legislature agrees to lift the freeze sometime in the future. However, for Taiwan to construct its own submarines, it must rely on foreign support for several key pieces of equipment and technology. These foreign supporters would also be forced to endure significant pressure, infiltration and influence from Beijing. In other words,
“I compare the Communist Party to my mother,” sings a student at a boarding school in a Tibetan region of China’s Qinghai province. “If faith has a color,” others at a different school sing, “it would surely be Chinese red.” In a major story for the New York Times this month, Chris Buckley wrote about the forced placement of hundreds of thousands of Tibetan children in boarding schools, where many suffer physical and psychological abuse. Separating these children from their families, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) aims to substitute itself for their parents and for their religion. Buckley’s reporting is
Last week, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), together holding more than half of the legislative seats, cut about NT$94 billion (US$2.85 billion) from the yearly budget. The cuts include 60 percent of the government’s advertising budget, 10 percent of administrative expenses, 3 percent of the military budget, and 60 percent of the international travel, overseas education and training allowances. In addition, the two parties have proposed freezing the budgets of many ministries and departments, including NT$1.8 billion from the Ministry of National Defense’s Indigenous Defense Submarine program — 90 percent of the program’s proposed
RSS