The influence of diet on health has been known since the Ancient Greeks. Our bodies simply cannot synthesize many essential compounds, so our health partly depends on what we eat and drink. Antioxidants, which are believed to help protect us against both cancer and heart disease, are one such element that we must import into our bodies. Studies have shown that there is a significant positive association between a higher intake of fruits and vegetables and reduced risk of chronic disease.
Fruits and vegetables are sources of numerous micronutrients, and some -- including b-carotene (a precursor of vitamin A), vitamin C, vitamin E and selenium -- have potential as antioxidants. But what specifically makes fruits and vegetables so beneficial is not clear.
The main role of antioxidants is to prevent oxidative damage to cellular components, so it has been proposed that dietary antioxidants decrease such damage and with it the risk of disease. This has stimulated interest in the possible preventive potential of antioxidant supplements.
Indeed, consumption of antioxidant supplements in developed countries has become widespread. More than one-third of adults in developed countries now ingest antioxidant pills, which is much easier than eating fruits and vegetables. But will the benefits be the same?
As with any therapeutic intervention, the most convincing and direct proof of the preventive efficacy of antioxidant supplements requires randomized, controlled clinical trials. Such trials eliminate the problems of participants' dietary record and controls the effects of both known and unknown confounding factors. So far, many studies have been conducted to verify the supposed beneficial effects of antioxidant supplements. But, while the results of the epidemiological studies have been almost uniformly positive, the results of clinical trials have remained largely inconclusive.
Some of the clinical trials were terminated prematurely because harmful effects of antioxidant supplements were observed. Indeed, the overwhelming evidence currently calls into question the preventive effect of antioxidant pills. On the contrary, they may be harmful, leading to an increased risk of mortality in people consuming them.
There are several possible explanations for the negative effect of antioxidant supplements. First, the "free radicals" that anti-oxidants act against perform a dual biological function. Free radicals are produced continuously in all cells as part of their normal functioning. In moderate concentrations, they are essential mediators of reactions by which our bodies eliminate unwanted cells.
By eliminating free radicals from our body, we interfere with important defensive mechanisms for eliminating damaged cells, including cancerous cells. In this way, antioxidant substances can also harm people. Whereas our diets typically contain safe levels, highly concentrated antioxidant supplements can be hazardous. In fact, the amount of antioxidants that lends protection is not known and probably differs among individuals. People exposed to increased oxidative stress may have elevated antioxidant requirements.
Moreover, antioxidant supplements in pills are synthetic and biochemically unbalanced compared to their naturally occurring counterparts. They are also not subjected to the same rigorous toxicity studies as other pharmaceutical agents. Indeed, we still lack substantial information on how our bodies metabolize them and how they interact with one another. As a result, it is still unclear whether dosage, duration of use, or parallel intake of other agents will result in differences in their effect.
It also is unclear whether oxidative stress is a primary cause or a secondary phenomenon of chronic diseases, as well as of the aging process. In most human disease, oxidative stress is merely a symptom. So the link between oxidative stress and disease should not be overemphasized.
There are still many gaps in our knowledge of the mechanisms of action of antioxidant supplements. Basic issues concerning the efficacy and safety of consuming relatively high doses of antioxidant supplements need to be resolved. Results of ongoing clinical trials and further studies are required to improve our knowledge.
In the meantime, we know that antioxidants can cause unwanted health consequences. So the optimal source for antioxidants is diet, not supplements. In short, we should stop taking pills and eat more fruits and vegetables.
Goran Bjelakovic is a professor of internal medicine at the University of Nis, Serbia.
Copyright: Project Syndicate
Speaking at the Copenhagen Democracy Summit on May 13, former president Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) said that democracies must remain united and that “Taiwan’s security is essential to regional stability and to defending democratic values amid mounting authoritarianism.” Earlier that day, Tsai had met with a group of Danish parliamentarians led by Danish Parliament Speaker Pia Kjaersgaard, who has visited Taiwan many times, most recently in November last year, when she met with President William Lai (賴清德) at the Presidential Office. Kjaersgaard had told Lai: “I can assure you that ... you can count on us. You can count on our support
Denmark has consistently defended Greenland in light of US President Donald Trump’s interests and has provided unwavering support to Ukraine during its war with Russia. Denmark can be proud of its clear support for peoples’ democratic right to determine their own future. However, this democratic ideal completely falls apart when it comes to Taiwan — and it raises important questions about Denmark’s commitment to supporting democracies. Taiwan lives under daily military threats from China, which seeks to take over Taiwan, by force if necessary — an annexation that only a very small minority in Taiwan supports. Denmark has given China a
Many local news media over the past week have reported on Internet personality Holger Chen’s (陳之漢) first visit to China between Tuesday last week and yesterday, as remarks he made during a live stream have sparked wide discussions and strong criticism across the Taiwan Strait. Chen, better known as Kuan Chang (館長), is a former gang member turned fitness celebrity and businessman. He is known for his live streams, which are full of foul-mouthed and hypermasculine commentary. He had previously spoken out against the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and criticized Taiwanese who “enjoy the freedom in Taiwan, but want China’s money”
A high-school student surnamed Yang (楊) gained admissions to several prestigious medical schools recently. However, when Yang shared his “learning portfolio” on social media, he was caught exaggerating and even falsifying content, and his admissions were revoked. Now he has to take the “advanced subjects test” scheduled for next month. With his outstanding performance in the general scholastic ability test (GSAT), Yang successfully gained admissions to five prestigious medical schools. However, his university dreams have now been frustrated by the “flaws” in his learning portfolio. This is a wake-up call not only for students, but also teachers. Yang did make a big