The Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) is in the process of selecting its legislative candidates via a party primary. Legislative candidates in some districts were able to make dramatic gains during the telephone poll phase, which counts for 70 percent of each hopeful's final "score," prompting the party's Bribery Investigation Subcommittee to investigate.
This turn of events begs the question: Does the DPP's primary system help the party to identify its most competent legislative candidates?
The party's candidates for legislator-at-large seats have also not yet been finalized. DPP Chairman Yu Shyi-kun will only decide on the four candidates that it is within his power to nominate in the next two months. Recent media reports have mentioned Legislator Chai Trong-rong (蔡同榮), caucus whip Ker Chien-ming (柯建銘) Vice President Annette Lu (呂秀蓮) and former premier Su Tseng-chang (蘇貞昌) as likely candidates.
The DPP's regulations for nomination of candidates for public offices from the 1990s included a section that stated quite clearly that every third nominee on the list should be an academic "expert" or a member of a disadvantaged group. This demonstrated the respect the DPP had for outside expertise, as well as their efforts to give a voice to the disadvantaged.
At this point, the DPP's primary has produced a legislator-at-large list that basically reflects the party's internal power struggle. Yu should use the maneuvering room given to him by the system to help redeem the party.
Chen Yi-shen is an associate researcher at Academia Sinica's Institute of Modern History.
Translated by Jason Cox
A gap appears to be emerging between Washington’s foreign policy elites and the broader American public on how the United States should respond to China’s rise. From my vantage working at a think tank in Washington, DC, and through regular travel around the United States, I increasingly experience two distinct discussions. This divergence — between America’s elite hawkishness and public caution — may become one of the least appreciated and most consequential external factors influencing Taiwan’s security environment in the years ahead. Within the American policy community, the dominant view of China has grown unmistakably tough. Many members of Congress, as
After declaring Iran’s military “gone,” US President Donald Trump appealed to the UK, France, Japan and South Korea — as well as China, Iran’s strategic partner — to send minesweepers and naval forces to reopen the Strait of Hormuz. When allies balked, the request turned into a warning: NATO would face “a very bad” future if it refused. The prevailing wisdom is that Trump faces a credibility problem: having spent years insulting allies, he finds they would not rally when he needs them. That is true, but superficial, as though a structural collapse could be caused by wounded feelings. Something
Former Taipei mayor and Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) founding chairman Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) was sentenced to 17 years in prison on Thursday, making headlines across major media. However, another case linked to the TPP — the indictment of Chinese immigrant Xu Chunying (徐春鶯) for alleged violations of the Anti-Infiltration Act (反滲透法) on Tuesday — has also stirred up heated discussions. Born in Shanghai, Xu became a resident of Taiwan through marriage in 1993. Currently the director of the Taiwan New Immigrant Development Association, she was elected to serve as legislator-at-large for the TPP in 2023, but was later charged with involvement
Out of 64 participating universities in this year’s Stars Program — through which schools directly recommend their top students to universities for admission — only 19 filled their admissions quotas. There were 922 vacancies, down more than 200 from last year; top universities had 37 unfilled places, 40 fewer than last year. The original purpose of the Stars Program was to expand admissions to a wider range of students. However, certain departments at elite universities that failed to meet their admissions quotas are not improving. Vacancies at top universities are linked to students’ program preferences on their applications, but inappropriate admission
RSS