Monday was the 18th anniversary of the Tiananmen Square Massacre. Eighteen years is a long time, but the countless people who witnessed it on the television can still clearly imagine those bloody scenes.
Yet in China, many people don't believe there was a massacre on June 4, 1989, and a lot of young people have no idea that anything occurred at Beijing's Tiananmen Square on that date.
Chinese studying abroad have written that it was only when they went overseas that they learned there had been a massacre.
It is hard to believe when we hear it, but this is the result of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) monopolizing the media, destroying evidence and fabricating history.
The Chinese government has been able to obliterate an incident that happened before people's eyes.
In this respect, the CCP and the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) are like brothers.
In Taiwan's 228 Incident, the KMT government also used the military to massacre civilians, later destroyed evidence and monopolized the media to change history.
Not long ago, SET-TV aired a special program about the 228 Incident.
The program's use of footage from a Shanghai massacre by the KMT caused a lot of debate, but SET-TV used the material because they had no footage of the actual incident.
It has been reported that there are only three photographs of the 228 massacre in existence.
Pictures and documentaries about World War II are widely available because by that time photography and filming were widespread.
It is odd that of the 228 Incident, which happened after World War II, hardly a photograph can be found, let alone documentaries.
Common sense
Common sense tells us that if little record of the 228 Incident can be found, the KMT must have destroyed all evidence of it.
In the more than half a century that has followed, the KMT acted just like the CCP after the Tiananmen Square Massacre: It fabricated history in order to prevent Taiwanese from knowing what really happened.
A few months ago, the KMT got together to demonstrate, dress someone up as Chiang Kai-shek (
They don't see him as the culprit responsible for the 228 Incident at all.
Although the KMT has not been the ruling party for years and can't rule like autocrats anymore, its reliance on the use of party power to suppress dissenting voices and its attempts to influence the media have not changed.
Underground radio
A week ago, Ocean Voice Radio, which is devoted to Taiwan's normalization, was closed by the National Communications Commission (NCC) because it was an underground radio station.
Ocean Voice Radio responded by saying it had not intended to broadcast illegally and had applied for a license several times, only to be refused.
According to an estimate by the Broadcasting Development Fund, six radio stations in Taiwan are controlled by the KMT's Broadcasting Corporation of China and four other stations are also predominantly controlled by the pan-blue camp.
The so-called "underground radio stations" have actually been created by the unfair system by which the pan-blue camp monopolizes radio channels.
The NCC also applies a double standard when dealing with underground radio stations.
The Broadcasting Development Fund has said that the NCC is not closing down a pan-blue radio station like Voice of the New Party, even though it is located right in Taipei, while traveling all the way to Taichung just to close down Ocean Voice Radio.
Furthermore, the NCC has not moved against TVBS even though it is funded by "100 percent foreign investment," despite a law that says foreign investment cannot account for more than half of the funding of a company.
Control
All of this serves to demonstrate that the KMT uses terms like "underground" or "illegal" as excuses to control the media -- the real reason it seeks to close such stations is because they support the pan-green camp.
Today the NCC, which is controlled by the KMT, is still monopolizing and controlling the media.
The KMT is well aware that monopolizing freedom of speech means that the monopolizers can control the understanding of history.
Taiwan is a democracy, but until the pan-blue camp's media monopoly is broken, there is still a long way to go.
Cao Changqing is a Chinese writer based in the US.
Translated by Anna Stiggelbout
There are moments in history when America has turned its back on its principles and withdrawn from past commitments in service of higher goals. For example, US-Soviet Cold War competition compelled America to make a range of deals with unsavory and undemocratic figures across Latin America and Africa in service of geostrategic aims. The United States overlooked mass atrocities against the Bengali population in modern-day Bangladesh in the early 1970s in service of its tilt toward Pakistan, a relationship the Nixon administration deemed critical to its larger aims in developing relations with China. Then, of course, America switched diplomatic recognition
The international women’s soccer match between Taiwan and New Zealand at the Kaohsiung Nanzih Football Stadium, scheduled for Tuesday last week, was canceled at the last minute amid safety concerns over poor field conditions raised by the visiting team. The Football Ferns, as New Zealand’s women’s soccer team are known, had arrived in Taiwan one week earlier to prepare and soon raised their concerns. Efforts were made to improve the field, but the replacement patches of grass could not grow fast enough. The Football Ferns canceled the closed-door training match and then days later, the main event against Team Taiwan. The safety
The National Immigration Agency on Tuesday said it had notified some naturalized citizens from China that they still had to renounce their People’s Republic of China (PRC) citizenship. They must provide proof that they have canceled their household registration in China within three months of the receipt of the notice. If they do not, the agency said it would cancel their household registration in Taiwan. Chinese are required to give up their PRC citizenship and household registration to become Republic of China (ROC) nationals, Mainland Affairs Council Minister Chiu Chui-cheng (邱垂正) said. He was referring to Article 9-1 of the Act
Strategic thinker Carl von Clausewitz has said that “war is politics by other means,” while investment guru Warren Buffett has said that “tariffs are an act of war.” Both aphorisms apply to China, which has long been engaged in a multifront political, economic and informational war against the US and the rest of the West. Kinetically also, China has launched the early stages of actual global conflict with its threats and aggressive moves against Taiwan, the Philippines and Japan, and its support for North Korea’s reckless actions against South Korea that could reignite the Korean War. Former US presidents Barack Obama
RSS