The Executive Yuan has been instructed by President Chen Shui-bian (
There has even been discussion about implementing the amnesty by May 20, the anniversary of Chen's inauguration.
While there are some merits to the amnesty plan, the government must carefully consider the repercussions it could have.
Immediately after the bill was announced, the pan-blue camp blasted the amnesty as a ploy to win votes in the year-end legislative election rather than a way to give those who have been convicted of minor crimes another chance.
As for the pan-green camp, it cannot be assumed that the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) would score any points with voters just because it offered an amnesty.
Only the inmates who would be released from prison early and their immediate families and friends would directly benefit.
Most others would probably feel indifferent or even a bit uneasy at the thought of criminals returning to society.
It should not be forgotten that excessively high crime rates continue to be perceived by most Taiwanese as a serious social problem.
Middle-class families -- the so-called moderate voters that the DPP desperately wants to win over -- rate crime as their single biggest concern.
Making matters worse, the government has not offered any compelling reason for the amnesty.
The first reason put forth -- that it has been 16 years since an amnesty was granted, 20 years since martial law was lifted and 60 years since the 228 Incident -- doesn't hold water.
The 1991 amnesty took place right after former president Lee Teng-hui (
Thus, the 1991 amnesty was granted not only as a way to commemorate the lifting of martial law, but also to free those who had been jailed for speaking out against oppressive one-party rule.
The Chen administration also said its proposed amnesty was targeted at reducing crowding in the nation's prisons.
Unfortunately, some see the burgeoning prison population as a result of the incompetent policies of the DPP administration.
To avoid stirring too much controversy, the Executive Yuan has repeatedly said that only those serving sentences of less than one year for minor and petty crimes would be eligible to receive a reduced sentence or amnesty.
The problem with this is that coming up with a definition of minor and petty crimes is very difficult. Certainly, the victims of crime never view the injustices done to them as minor.
As the government struggles with listing the crimes that are eligible for the amnesty, it removes an increasing number of offenses, reducing its scope.
The result is that the impact of the amnesty will become smaller and fail to accomplish what Chen had hoped for.
A gap appears to be emerging between Washington’s foreign policy elites and the broader American public on how the United States should respond to China’s rise. From my vantage working at a think tank in Washington, DC, and through regular travel around the United States, I increasingly experience two distinct discussions. This divergence — between America’s elite hawkishness and public caution — may become one of the least appreciated and most consequential external factors influencing Taiwan’s security environment in the years ahead. Within the American policy community, the dominant view of China has grown unmistakably tough. Many members of Congress, as
After declaring Iran’s military “gone,” US President Donald Trump appealed to the UK, France, Japan and South Korea — as well as China, Iran’s strategic partner — to send minesweepers and naval forces to reopen the Strait of Hormuz. When allies balked, the request turned into a warning: NATO would face “a very bad” future if it refused. The prevailing wisdom is that Trump faces a credibility problem: having spent years insulting allies, he finds they would not rally when he needs them. That is true, but superficial, as though a structural collapse could be caused by wounded feelings. Something
Former Taipei mayor and Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) founding chairman Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) was sentenced to 17 years in prison on Thursday, making headlines across major media. However, another case linked to the TPP — the indictment of Chinese immigrant Xu Chunying (徐春鶯) for alleged violations of the Anti-Infiltration Act (反滲透法) on Tuesday — has also stirred up heated discussions. Born in Shanghai, Xu became a resident of Taiwan through marriage in 1993. Currently the director of the Taiwan New Immigrant Development Association, she was elected to serve as legislator-at-large for the TPP in 2023, but was later charged with involvement
Out of 64 participating universities in this year’s Stars Program — through which schools directly recommend their top students to universities for admission — only 19 filled their admissions quotas. There were 922 vacancies, down more than 200 from last year; top universities had 37 unfilled places, 40 fewer than last year. The original purpose of the Stars Program was to expand admissions to a wider range of students. However, certain departments at elite universities that failed to meet their admissions quotas are not improving. Vacancies at top universities are linked to students’ program preferences on their applications, but inappropriate admission
RSS