Cloned station express
Dear Johnny,
Any idea why the Chiayi and Tainan stations of the bullet train are built using exactly the same architectural design, 99.9 percent the same building, materials and all?
It's true. Both stations are the same design, just different names in front. The same architect.
Why? To save money?
Also, the tickets for the bullet train do not mention anywhere on the ticket stub that the issuer is Taiwan High Speed Rail Corp, not once. Talk about branding!
Why would anyone want to collect a ticket that does not even state the name of the issuer, anywhere, not in Chinese or English or Japanese? Nuttin! Go look.
Chiayi Chuck
Johnny replies: I bet you didn't know this, but back in the days when I could run around in public without wearing any pants, the refugee Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) government decided to split up some of the counties into smaller ones, presumably so that local government could operate in a more relevant manner.
One of these counties was Taipei, which included today's Taipei, Taoyuan and Ilan counties.
Another was Tainan, which was split into today's Tainan, Chiayi and Yunlin counties.
So forgive my onset of paranoia if I smell a rat. It seems to me that Tainan supremacists have infiltrated the operations of the bullet train construction process to ensure that old Tainan is unified -- starting with these stations.
But there's another possibility. Everyone's talking about the 228 Incident at the moment, right? Well, did you know that there is a hideous obelisk commemorating the 228 Incident in Chiayi that has a clone up in the mountains in Alishan Township (
Yep, that's right. The same obelisk, and even the same text describing what happened (stupidly enough, the Alishan clone makes no mention of why Alishan should have its own obelisk). So maybe the problem is with Chiayi, Chuck. You guys just dig cloning.
Or else it's what normal people would guess: The stations are the same and tickets unmarked because the good people at Taiwan High Speed Rail Corp couldn't be bothered.
But if so, give them a break: The officials then had more time to concentrate on buying up prime land near the stations for themselves.
A gap appears to be emerging between Washington’s foreign policy elites and the broader American public on how the United States should respond to China’s rise. From my vantage working at a think tank in Washington, DC, and through regular travel around the United States, I increasingly experience two distinct discussions. This divergence — between America’s elite hawkishness and public caution — may become one of the least appreciated and most consequential external factors influencing Taiwan’s security environment in the years ahead. Within the American policy community, the dominant view of China has grown unmistakably tough. Many members of Congress, as
After declaring Iran’s military “gone,” US President Donald Trump appealed to the UK, France, Japan and South Korea — as well as China, Iran’s strategic partner — to send minesweepers and naval forces to reopen the Strait of Hormuz. When allies balked, the request turned into a warning: NATO would face “a very bad” future if it refused. The prevailing wisdom is that Trump faces a credibility problem: having spent years insulting allies, he finds they would not rally when he needs them. That is true, but superficial, as though a structural collapse could be caused by wounded feelings. Something
Former Taipei mayor and Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) founding chairman Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) was sentenced to 17 years in prison on Thursday, making headlines across major media. However, another case linked to the TPP — the indictment of Chinese immigrant Xu Chunying (徐春鶯) for alleged violations of the Anti-Infiltration Act (反滲透法) on Tuesday — has also stirred up heated discussions. Born in Shanghai, Xu became a resident of Taiwan through marriage in 1993. Currently the director of the Taiwan New Immigrant Development Association, she was elected to serve as legislator-at-large for the TPP in 2023, but was later charged with involvement
Out of 64 participating universities in this year’s Stars Program — through which schools directly recommend their top students to universities for admission — only 19 filled their admissions quotas. There were 922 vacancies, down more than 200 from last year; top universities had 37 unfilled places, 40 fewer than last year. The original purpose of the Stars Program was to expand admissions to a wider range of students. However, certain departments at elite universities that failed to meet their admissions quotas are not improving. Vacancies at top universities are linked to students’ program preferences on their applications, but inappropriate admission
RSS