A recent editorial ("A lesson from the education minister," Jan. 18, page 8) mentioned that President Chen Shui-bian (
It said, "Chen should have lodged a protest. It is the government's job to uphold the identity and dignity of the nation, both in word and deed."
While I have sympathy for this opinion, I feel that Taiwan's political class and media are far too wedded to the idea of "protesting."
The message that I see coming from Taiwan is overwhelmingly: "We're not China."
It is a negative, reactive stance that does no favors to Taiwan's image.
Chen most certainly should not have lodged a protest in Nicaragua. Such formalities are the job of embassy functionaries, not heads of state.
Chen's smoothing over of the error may have been too conciliatory, but the last thing a mature state wants to see is their leader quibbling over words.
If Taiwan wishes to project an image that differentiates it from China, there are many aspects of Taiwanese life that it could choose to highlight: democracy, human rights, a free press, value-added businesses, etc.
These aspects all need to be presented independently, not in the context of comparisons with China.
Taiwan needs to find proactive and innovative ways of presenting itself, and to stop simply reacting to statements and actions by the PRC.
Finally, I want to suggest that worrying about Taiwan's image is a rather secondary duty of the government.
A responsible government should be focused on providing for the welfare of its people. A truly confident nation does not waste time worrying about its image; it simply goes out and creates one.
Philip Hand
Xiamen, China
The gutting of Voice of America (VOA) and Radio Free Asia (RFA) by US President Donald Trump’s administration poses a serious threat to the global voice of freedom, particularly for those living under authoritarian regimes such as China. The US — hailed as the model of liberal democracy — has the moral responsibility to uphold the values it champions. In undermining these institutions, the US risks diminishing its “soft power,” a pivotal pillar of its global influence. VOA Tibetan and RFA Tibetan played an enormous role in promoting the strong image of the US in and outside Tibet. On VOA Tibetan,
Sung Chien-liang (宋建樑), the leader of the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) efforts to recall Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Lee Kun-cheng (李坤城), caused a national outrage and drew diplomatic condemnation on Tuesday after he arrived at the New Taipei City District Prosecutors’ Office dressed in a Nazi uniform. Sung performed a Nazi salute and carried a copy of Adolf Hitler’s Mein Kampf as he arrived to be questioned over allegations of signature forgery in the recall petition. The KMT’s response to the incident has shown a striking lack of contrition and decency. Rather than apologizing and distancing itself from Sung’s actions,
US President Trump weighed into the state of America’s semiconductor manufacturing when he declared, “They [Taiwan] stole it from us. They took it from us, and I don’t blame them. I give them credit.” At a prior White House event President Trump hosted TSMC chairman C.C. Wei (魏哲家), head of the world’s largest and most advanced chip manufacturer, to announce a commitment to invest US$100 billion in America. The president then shifted his previously critical rhetoric on Taiwan and put off tariffs on its chips. Now we learn that the Trump Administration is conducting a “trade investigation” on semiconductors which
By now, most of Taiwan has heard Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an’s (蔣萬安) threats to initiate a vote of no confidence against the Cabinet. His rationale is that the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP)-led government’s investigation into alleged signature forgery in the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) recall campaign constitutes “political persecution.” I sincerely hope he goes through with it. The opposition currently holds a majority in the Legislative Yuan, so the initiation of a no-confidence motion and its passage should be entirely within reach. If Chiang truly believes that the government is overreaching, abusing its power and targeting political opponents — then