Former Democratic Progressive Party chairman Shih Ming-deh's (
Despite all the hullabaloo of a few months ago, the area outside Taipei Railway Station has been purged of the red-shirted demonstrators.
Taiwan has no lack of sunshine reformers, self-serving reformers, show-boating reformers and free-loading reformers.
These will always be here to lead the naive and seek their spot in the limelight.
What Taiwan could use more of, however, are sincere and dedicated people who are interested in true reform across the board with the goal of benefitting Taiwan.
Shih's whole campaign collapsed as it became evident that it was not supported by the voice of the people. It was fueled by those with a pronounced hatred for President Chen Shui-bian (
It turned out that the March of a Million was actually no more than 360,000 pan-blue supporters.
Then there were the donations. Shih's campaign managed to collect around NT$110 million (US$3 million) in donations.
But despite the immediacy of the donations and the pan-blue cries for accountability by Chen, Shih's campaign has purposely avoided true accountability for the sources of its own income.
Yes, here was a huge fund for the purpose of pressuring the government to depose Chen. This money was never accounted for.
It was suspected that Chen Yu-hao (
It was also suspected that China may have contributed to the campaign.
Shih's campaign was not transparent in accounting for its sources and spending. The story that it came from grass roots supporters donating NT$100 each has not been proven.
The straw that broke the camel's back, however, came with the realization that Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Ma Ying-jeou (
In addition, many legislators and officials from the pan-blue and pan-green camps themselves may not have clean hands.
Blinded by its fixation with vilifying Chen, the pan-blue media unintentionally opened a Pandora's Box that revealed a system prone to corruption and in dire need of reform.
This system is just one of many problems that remain from the country's time as a one-party state.
After Ma came into focus, the pan-blue media shut up. To say anything further would have meant analyzing the flaws in the system and calling for reform.
It would have meant dragging the KMT's skeletons out of the closet. The pan-blue media and the demonstrators were more interested in attacking Chen.
Where is Shih now? He has pulled off a disappearing act.
Shih says he is in seclusion in a little apartment with a back door near Taipei Railway Station until next year.
Is that what the campaign money was for? Shih will occasionally show his head to try to justify that the money spent on him was not wasted.
Nevertheless, an obvious question remains. Was Shih ever committed to real reform? He never campaigned against pan-blue corruption.
Although he traipsed around the nation campaigning against Chen, Shih could not bring himself to lead his troops the short distance to Keelung where the mayor had been convicted of corruption with a capital C. The mayor is still in office there and protected by the KMT.
None of Taiwan's sunshine reformers want to tackle that reality.
Where have all the supporting politicians like People First Party Chairman James Soong (
Soong joined Shih and then ran for and lost Taipei's mayorship. Soong is checking up on his property in the US. He was not dedicated to reform.
Where are all the sages of Academia Sinica and the literary figures that weighed in on the depose Chen debate? They are suddenly silent.
Have they weighed in on any of the other convicted or accused corruption cases in this country?
Not quite -- those cases are nitty-gritty reform cases that demand a lot of work with little exposure to the limelight.
There is no question that Taiwan needs reform of both political camps.
There is also no question that Taiwan's governmental system is in desperate need of reform.
With the approach of the legislative elections in December, sincere reform must be a critical factor in evaluating and selecting candidates.
In the coming year, Taiwan must assess what true reform is.
While it does that, let me make a few related predictions for this year. Only time will tell if my predictions are correct.
We will never see true accountability of the sources that donated money to Shih's protest campaign.
We will never see full accountability for the expenditure of the NT$40 million to NT$50 million remaining in that fund either. The records for expenditure of the first NT$60 million were vague.
The KMT's stolen assets that Ma promised in 2005 would be sold will not all have been sold by the end of this year.
The money from whatever assets the KMT does manage to sell off will -- like the previous sales -- never be returned to the public.
The money will be used to pay off the KMT's bills or fund Ma's presidential campaign.
The media will continue to avoid doing its job.
It will neither push for true reform across the board nor will it seek to find out answers to questions like where Shih's campain money came from and where it went.
Jerome Keating is a writer based in Taiwan.
In an article published in Newsweek on Monday last week, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged China to retake territories it lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. “If it is really for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t China take back Russia?” Lai asked, referring to territories lost in 1858 and 1860. The territories once made up the two flanks of northern Manchuria. Once ceded to Russia, they became part of the Russian far east. Claims since then have been made that China and Russia settled the disputes in the 1990s through the 2000s and that “China
Trips to the Kenting Peninsula in Pingtung County have dredged up a lot of public debate and furor, with many complaints about how expensive and unreasonable lodging is. Some people even call it a tourist “butchering ground.” Many local business owners stake claims to beach areas by setting up parasols and driving away people who do not rent them. The managing authority for the area — Kenting National Park — has long ignored the issue. Ultimately, this has affected the willingness of domestic travelers to go there, causing tourist numbers to plummet. In 2008, Taiwan opened the door to Chinese tourists and in
Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) Chairman Ko Wen-je’s (柯文哲) arrest is a significant development. He could have become president or vice president on a shared TPP-Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) ticket and could have stood again in 2028. If he is found guilty, there would be little chance of that, but what of his party? What about the third force in Taiwanese politics? What does this mean for the disenfranchised young people who he attracted, and what does it mean for his ambitious and ideologically fickle right-hand man, TPP caucus leader Huang Kuo-chang (黃國昌)? Ko and Huang have been appealing to that
On Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) met with a delegation from the Hoover Institution, a think tank based at Stanford University in California, to discuss strengthening US-Taiwan relations and enhancing peace and stability in the region. The delegation was led by James Ellis Jr, co-chair of the institution’s Taiwan in the Indo-Pacific Region project and former commander of the US Strategic Command. It also included former Australian minister for foreign affairs Marise Payne, influential US academics and other former policymakers. Think tank diplomacy is an important component of Taiwan’s efforts to maintain high-level dialogue with other nations with which it does
RSS