Recently the Chinese Nation-alist Party (KMT) proposed amendments to the Statute Governing the Reconstruction of Weathered Military Communities (
As with other public policies, this one involves social justice, the government's use of its political and financial resources and advantage versus marginalization. Of course there were possible issues with this amendment regarding the burden on the residents of the military communities, and the rights of the dispersed veteran families outside the communities. And it would be no surprise if the plan also involved the political and economic interests, as well as electoral considerations, of a minority of the legislators who raised the proposal.
The legislature is a place where people advocating different interests and viewpoints can engage in transparent debate. But the current manipulation by the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) is an example of the worst kind of public political discussion. It has taken the complex questions over the costs, benefits and overall fairness of the project and dumbed them down into an unfair struggle for resources between the weak Taiwanese and the advantaged Mainlander minority. This is a perfect example of how politics can divide Taiwanese society.
The DPP has always claimed it represents the progressiveness of Taiwan's diverse society and culture. Yet on the other hand, it encourages a minority of people to use the subject of Mainlander interests to twist Taiwan's political advancement.
Veteran families both inside and outside the veteran communities have never been purely made up of Mainlanders. The great majority are of mixed ethnicity. Not only did the first generation intermarry, but also the second, third and so on.
The Association of Mainlander Taiwanese is an organization which promotes the cultural preservation of veteran communities. We worry that after they are all torn down in 2009, one of Taiwan's most important cultural features will be lost overnight. That is why last year we pressed for a non-partisan amendment to incorporate cultural preservation into the statute, so that reconstruction efforts would also work to preserve cultural and architectural artifacts, and give counties and cities another opportunity to participate.
This year we also want to earn a NT$10 million budget in the hope of preserving Taiwan's diverse culture, the aesthetic beauty of the communities and to create a community atmosphere in which coexistence is respected.
Today, people working to preserve the culture of the veteran communities feel as if they've been unfairly drawn into a conflict which is not of their making. We sincerely call on the ruling and opposition parties, the MOD and all members of society to look more broadly at the facts.
Stop using ethnic smears as an argument, and instead communicate by discussing the matters at hand. Acknowledge the diversity of the veteran communities. Seek to promote ordinary citizens and a spatial and cultural transformation by building communities. Create the possibility of a new form of diverse Taiwanese culture.
Chang Mao-kuei is a research fellow at the Institute of Sociology at Academia Sinica and president of the Association of Mainlander Taiwanese. Translated by Marc Langer
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
If you had a vision of the future where China did not dominate the global car industry, you can kiss those dreams goodbye. That is because US President Donald Trump’s promised 25 percent tariff on auto imports takes an ax to the only bits of the emerging electric vehicle (EV) supply chain that are not already dominated by Beijing. The biggest losers when the levies take effect this week would be Japan and South Korea. They account for one-third of the cars imported into the US, and as much as two-thirds of those imported from outside North America. (Mexico and Canada, while
I have heard people equate the government’s stance on resisting forced unification with China or the conditional reinstatement of the military court system with the rise of the Nazis before World War II. The comparison is absurd. There is no meaningful parallel between the government and Nazi Germany, nor does such a mindset exist within the general public in Taiwan. It is important to remember that the German public bore some responsibility for the horrors of the Holocaust. Post-World War II Germany’s transitional justice efforts were rooted in a national reckoning and introspection. Many Jews were sent to concentration camps not
RSS