Recently the Chinese Nation-alist Party (KMT) proposed amendments to the Statute Governing the Reconstruction of Weathered Military Communities (
As with other public policies, this one involves social justice, the government's use of its political and financial resources and advantage versus marginalization. Of course there were possible issues with this amendment regarding the burden on the residents of the military communities, and the rights of the dispersed veteran families outside the communities. And it would be no surprise if the plan also involved the political and economic interests, as well as electoral considerations, of a minority of the legislators who raised the proposal.
The legislature is a place where people advocating different interests and viewpoints can engage in transparent debate. But the current manipulation by the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) is an example of the worst kind of public political discussion. It has taken the complex questions over the costs, benefits and overall fairness of the project and dumbed them down into an unfair struggle for resources between the weak Taiwanese and the advantaged Mainlander minority. This is a perfect example of how politics can divide Taiwanese society.
The DPP has always claimed it represents the progressiveness of Taiwan's diverse society and culture. Yet on the other hand, it encourages a minority of people to use the subject of Mainlander interests to twist Taiwan's political advancement.
Veteran families both inside and outside the veteran communities have never been purely made up of Mainlanders. The great majority are of mixed ethnicity. Not only did the first generation intermarry, but also the second, third and so on.
The Association of Mainlander Taiwanese is an organization which promotes the cultural preservation of veteran communities. We worry that after they are all torn down in 2009, one of Taiwan's most important cultural features will be lost overnight. That is why last year we pressed for a non-partisan amendment to incorporate cultural preservation into the statute, so that reconstruction efforts would also work to preserve cultural and architectural artifacts, and give counties and cities another opportunity to participate.
This year we also want to earn a NT$10 million budget in the hope of preserving Taiwan's diverse culture, the aesthetic beauty of the communities and to create a community atmosphere in which coexistence is respected.
Today, people working to preserve the culture of the veteran communities feel as if they've been unfairly drawn into a conflict which is not of their making. We sincerely call on the ruling and opposition parties, the MOD and all members of society to look more broadly at the facts.
Stop using ethnic smears as an argument, and instead communicate by discussing the matters at hand. Acknowledge the diversity of the veteran communities. Seek to promote ordinary citizens and a spatial and cultural transformation by building communities. Create the possibility of a new form of diverse Taiwanese culture.
Chang Mao-kuei is a research fellow at the Institute of Sociology at Academia Sinica and president of the Association of Mainlander Taiwanese. Translated by Marc Langer
Why is Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) not a “happy camper” these days regarding Taiwan? Taiwanese have not become more “CCP friendly” in response to the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) use of spies and graft by the United Front Work Department, intimidation conducted by the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) and the Armed Police/Coast Guard, and endless subversive political warfare measures, including cyber-attacks, economic coercion, and diplomatic isolation. The percentage of Taiwanese that prefer the status quo or prefer moving towards independence continues to rise — 76 percent as of December last year. According to National Chengchi University (NCCU) polling, the Taiwanese
It would be absurd to claim to see a silver lining behind every US President Donald Trump cloud. Those clouds are too many, too dark and too dangerous. All the same, viewed from a domestic political perspective, there is a clear emerging UK upside to Trump’s efforts at crashing the post-Cold War order. It might even get a boost from Thursday’s Washington visit by British Prime Minister Keir Starmer. In July last year, when Starmer became prime minister, the Labour Party was rigidly on the defensive about Europe. Brexit was seen as an electorally unstable issue for a party whose priority
US President Donald Trump is systematically dismantling the network of multilateral institutions, organizations and agreements that have helped prevent a third world war for more than 70 years. Yet many governments are twisting themselves into knots trying to downplay his actions, insisting that things are not as they seem and that even if they are, confronting the menace in the White House simply is not an option. Disagreement must be carefully disguised to avoid provoking his wrath. For the British political establishment, the convenient excuse is the need to preserve the UK’s “special relationship” with the US. Following their White House
US President Donald Trump’s return to the White House has brought renewed scrutiny to the Taiwan-US semiconductor relationship with his claim that Taiwan “stole” the US chip business and threats of 100 percent tariffs on foreign-made processors. For Taiwanese and industry leaders, understanding those developments in their full context is crucial while maintaining a clear vision of Taiwan’s role in the global technology ecosystem. The assertion that Taiwan “stole” the US’ semiconductor industry fundamentally misunderstands the evolution of global technology manufacturing. Over the past four decades, Taiwan’s semiconductor industry, led by Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), has grown through legitimate means