The issue of Taiwanese independence has become one of world interest. However, the manner in which the story has been developing gives the
impression that it will not be possible to resolve the issue in a way that is acceptable to Taiwan and China.
On the one hand, you have an island where people have developed their own culture, government and technology and the people would like to maintain this and be recognized for these successes and developments as an independent nation. On the other hand, this island -- with historical ties to Japan and the US -- has technologies Beijing would like to get its hands on to further its objectives. Taiwan's strategic alliance with Japan and the US is showing big on the radar screens in Beijing.
An acceptable compromise would perhaps involve recognition of Taiwan as an independent nation in return for a Taiwanese military and technological alliance with China. Just as the US operates with its allies, China and Taiwan would operate joint military bases and synchronize their efforts to ensure security at home.
The benefits to Taiwan would be the following:
* It turns a potentially aggressive neighbor into a protector who can respond quickly.
* It gains access to China's defense manufacturing facilities, allowing Taiwan to develop its own defense technology rather than sending contentiously large amounts of money to foreign powers for the purchase of old technology.
* Taiwan gains universal recognition as an independent nation.
The benefits to China would be:
* One of its neighbors becomes a strong ally.
* It gains access to new technology.
* It expands its world influence, raises its trustworthiness and gains recognition for the the mature way in which it resolved a contentious issue.
If this is successful, other countries might also form alliances with Taiwan and China, thus forming a snowball effect o in securing East Asia.
This is just a seed of an idea, but with proper refinement it could perhaps serve as a basis for improved Taipei-Beijing relations.
John Stewien
South Australia
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
If you had a vision of the future where China did not dominate the global car industry, you can kiss those dreams goodbye. That is because US President Donald Trump’s promised 25 percent tariff on auto imports takes an ax to the only bits of the emerging electric vehicle (EV) supply chain that are not already dominated by Beijing. The biggest losers when the levies take effect this week would be Japan and South Korea. They account for one-third of the cars imported into the US, and as much as two-thirds of those imported from outside North America. (Mexico and Canada, while
I have heard people equate the government’s stance on resisting forced unification with China or the conditional reinstatement of the military court system with the rise of the Nazis before World War II. The comparison is absurd. There is no meaningful parallel between the government and Nazi Germany, nor does such a mindset exist within the general public in Taiwan. It is important to remember that the German public bore some responsibility for the horrors of the Holocaust. Post-World War II Germany’s transitional justice efforts were rooted in a national reckoning and introspection. Many Jews were sent to concentration camps not
RSS