On Jan. 11, Reuters news agency reported from Beijing that Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Secretary-General and Chinese President Hu Jintao (
The agency quoted sources as saying that this would help Hu further consolidate his grip on the CCP.
That view, however, is highly debatable.
In 1959, Mao Zedong (
At the time, it was said he was stepping down in order to have more time to concentrate on his study of Marxist-Leninist theory. After the death of millions of people as a result of the Three Red Flags movement, Mao was forced to reflect on his wrongdoings.
To regain his hold on power, he unleashed the bloody Cultural Revolution.
When Lin Biao (林彪), Mao's second-in-command, wanted to take over leadership and the presidency in the early 1970s, he was pushed aside by Mao and is said to have died in an airplane crash in the Mongolian desert while trying to flee the country. China had no presidential post during the decade of the Cultural Revolution.
A few years after Mao's death, in 1982 the Chinese constitution was changed to reinstate the position. To avoid internal power struggles, however, the post was no longer occupied by any of the top officials in the Political Bureau of the CCP's Central Committee.
Not until well ito the 1990s, when Jiang Zemin (江澤民) combined the CCP secretary-general and the presidency, did the presidency begin to have substantial administrative powers. Jiang was the chairman of China's Central Military Commission and also chaired the CCP's military commission.
If, after becoming president, Zeng wanted to place the military under civilian command, Hu would have no choice but to give up his hold on the military, which would put the military in opposition to the party.
The battle for the presidency reveals the vagaries of the CCP's internal power struggles. Last June, Hu was only able to dissolve the Shanghai Clique thanks to Zeng's cooperation. This was followed by the dismissal of Shanghai mayor Chen Liangyu (
The investigations were not allowed to continue because had they reached the allegedly corrupt Vice Premier Huang Ju (黃菊) and Chairman of the National Committee of the Chinese People's Political Consultative Conference Jia Qinglin (賈慶林) -- both of whom are also members of the Standing Committee of the CCP's Political Bureau -- the CCP and the Chinese state would have been shaken at their foundations.
Hu and Wen skirted this challenge because they knew that their own families were not clean either.
So the question remains: How should Hu repay Zeng for his help in eliminating Chen? The answer seems to be that Zeng wants to be president of China.
To secure his position, Hu had Yu Keping (俞可平), deputy director of the Central Translation Bureau and member of Hu's think tank, publish an essay titled Democracy Is A Good Thing (民主是個好東西) to promote democracy and garner public support. The essay has been widely discussed.
Also, the cover story of the year's first issue of the Beijing-based Caijing magazine dealt with the Luneng Group (
Key to the Luneng Group's transformation was Zeng Wei (
Two other key figures were Yu Zhengsheng (
The other was Wang Lequan (
The power struggle in the People's Liberation Army (PLA) is even more frightening. The anti-corruption campaign and personnel changes among high-ranking officials have caused the military to plunge into turmoil.
Last year, the PLA Air Force had five plane crashes and there already have been two this year. After being led by Jiang for a dozen years, the military is on the brink of becoming a major battleground in China's power struggle.
Paul Lin is a political commentator based in Taipei.
Translated by Lin Ya-ti
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its
RSS