In the current run-up to next year's Summer Olympics in Beijing, the Communist Party media minders inside China have relaxed the rules a bit for foreign journalists, but many people remain skeptical about this new openness. Is it genuine, and more importantly, will it last longer than a year and a half?
From the New York Times to CNN, international reporters and their editors are wondering if China really means business, or if the apparent shift in policy is just a public relations charade for the sake of headlines.
For about 18 months, starting now, China's media minders say they will allow foreign journalists unprecedented freedom to work inside the country. But Agence France Presse, in a recent report from Beijing, wrote that while "foreign journalists in China began a new year of supposedly more open reporting, [there is] lingering skepticism over how faithfully local-level officials will implement relaxed media rules."
According to the new regulations, foreign reporters will be able to "travel freely and interview anyone with the interviewee's consent, dropping cumbersome official approvals which were often denied anyway by security-conscious authorities."
In theory, the changes should grant foreign reporters access to Chinese dissidents and other critics of the Chinese Communist Party -- and to those people inside China who recognize Taiwan as a separate country and who support Taiwan's nation-building process.
The Foreign Correspondents Club of China (which is composed of reporters from such publications as the New York Times, Newsweek, Time, the Guardian and from CNN) has encouraged its members to report any abuses of the new rules and plans to collect the data to show to Chinese officials later, said Melinda Liu, the club's president and the bureau chief for Newsweek magazine in Beijing.
One wonders if these new regulations will allow foreign reporters to call Taiwan a "country" when they send out their dispatches, especially during the Summer Olympics, when Taiwanese athletes participate in the Games in Beijing.
While AFP reported that a top Chinese official said that he hoped the new rules would be extended after the Olympics "if all goes well," such an outcome is highly unlikely.
Some international observers feel that the new rules for foreign journalists could have the same effect as China's entry into the WTO, which created greater openness in the country's economy. But others remain skeptical.
Liu told AFP that the new regulations were "a welcome development." But she added that "if grassroots officials are not well-briefed or actively drag their feet, there will still be problems."
And what if a reporter for the New York Times or Newsweek wants to interview Taiwanese athletes at the Summer Olympics about their feelings about Taiwan's sovereignty or the insulting "Chinese Taipei" moniker imposed on them by PRC pressure on the International Olympics Committee?
Will Beijing allow foreign journalists to report their real responses, in print and on air? While China is trying to show the world a new openness in the year-long run-up to the Summer Olympics, much of the world remains skeptical about how long this openness will last.
Expect some good official foot-dragging. And expect some significant problems when it comes to reporting the truth about Taiwan from inside China. If China still regards Taiwan as "a renegade province," as it loves to tell the world, how will it ever allow foreign media to report that Taiwan is not a renegade province, but a separate country, a free, independent, sovereign nation unto itself?
The answers will become apparent next year.
Dan Bloom is freelance writer in Taiwan.
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS