Oranges are just entering their peak season in Taiwan, but Beijing and Taiwan's pro-China forces have already joined hands and said that they want to buy Taiwanese oranges. One can't help but wonder whether this is not another one of Beijing's "united front" tactics.
Remember when there was a glut of bananas in Taiwan last October? Beijing announced then that it would purchase a total of 2,000 tonnes at a cross-strait forum on agriculture sponsored by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Chinese Communist Party. A report released recently by the Council of Agriculture, however, shows that China in effect bought a mere 118 tonnes -- or 5.9 percent of what it promised to buy -- for a total of less than NT$2 million (US$610,000).
At that time, quite a number of Taiwanese organizations offered to boost their banana orders, while consumers started purchasing more bananas on a daily basis to help struggling farmers. However, certain media outlets mocked these efforts, saying that "even if all Taiwanese stuff themselves with bananas, they are still not not going to help the situation improve."
Statistics say otherwise. Two weeks after the issue was made public, domestic orders for bananas increased by more than 200 tonnes, allowing the wholesale price of bananas to recover to a reasonable level.
Emergency exports of agricultural products during a glut is not a solution. It would certainly be a good thing if Taiwan could sell its surplus produce to China -- without politics involved. However, as the experience with trying to sell bananas to China shows, business opportunities created as part of Beijing's "united front" tactics are deceptive. They either quickly vanish when the political end is fulfilled, or never materialize.
Taiwan should adopt a pragmatic approach in liberalizing its produce market to ease the pressure on local farmers. The Chinese market could be one of the links in Taiwan's agricultural export chain, but it is not the most important link, nor is it the only link. Taiwanese should not put all their efforts into investing in a high-risk market like China. Nor should Taiwanese farmers harbor any illusion that China's offer comes with no strings attached or give up on concentrating their efforts on adjusting and upgrading the agricultural industry as a whole.
Ever since Japan adopted stricter measures to test for chemical residue in agricultural products last May, some Taiwanese farmers have turned their eyes to China, which has less stringent import measures. That's a short-sighted strategy. If Taiwanese farmers could upgrade their agricultural technology and quality control to meet Japan's strict criteria, they would have an edge over their rivals and avoid the cut-throat competition in lower end markets. This would increase their chances of breaking into markets that demand higher quality standards like the US and Europe.
Both the Taiwanese government and farmers should view China's failure to purchase 2,000 tonnes of Taiwanese bananas and Japan's move to raise its inspection criteria for agricultural products as a turning point rather than a crisis.
Roger Wu is professor of agriculture economics at National Taiwan University Translated by Daniel Cheng
In an article published in Newsweek on Monday last week, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged China to retake territories it lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. “If it is really for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t China take back Russia?” Lai asked, referring to territories lost in 1858 and 1860. The territories once made up the two flanks of northern Manchuria. Once ceded to Russia, they became part of the Russian far east. Claims since then have been made that China and Russia settled the disputes in the 1990s through the 2000s and that “China
Trips to the Kenting Peninsula in Pingtung County have dredged up a lot of public debate and furor, with many complaints about how expensive and unreasonable lodging is. Some people even call it a tourist “butchering ground.” Many local business owners stake claims to beach areas by setting up parasols and driving away people who do not rent them. The managing authority for the area — Kenting National Park — has long ignored the issue. Ultimately, this has affected the willingness of domestic travelers to go there, causing tourist numbers to plummet. In 2008, Taiwan opened the door to Chinese tourists and in
Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) Chairman Ko Wen-je’s (柯文哲) arrest is a significant development. He could have become president or vice president on a shared TPP-Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) ticket and could have stood again in 2028. If he is found guilty, there would be little chance of that, but what of his party? What about the third force in Taiwanese politics? What does this mean for the disenfranchised young people who he attracted, and what does it mean for his ambitious and ideologically fickle right-hand man, TPP caucus leader Huang Kuo-chang (黃國昌)? Ko and Huang have been appealing to that
On Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) met with a delegation from the Hoover Institution, a think tank based at Stanford University in California, to discuss strengthening US-Taiwan relations and enhancing peace and stability in the region. The delegation was led by James Ellis Jr, co-chair of the institution’s Taiwan in the Indo-Pacific Region project and former commander of the US Strategic Command. It also included former Australian minister for foreign affairs Marise Payne, influential US academics and other former policymakers. Think tank diplomacy is an important component of Taiwan’s efforts to maintain high-level dialogue with other nations with which it does
RSS