Supporters of President Chen Shui-bian (
general as a victory.
Although the pan-greens are entitled to celebrate finally succeeding in having this important post filled, the appointment is not a victory for the pan-greens or even the Chen administration.
Rather, it is the natural outcome of the ongoing disintegration of the pan-blue "alliance," which was always more of a marriage of convenience than a love affair.
The People First Party (PFP) needs to be taken seriously by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) if it is to be taken seriously on the national stage. And the KMT needs the PFP out there on the fringe of reason and popular opinion, the bogeyman that could play perpetual spoiler to the Democratic Progressive Party's attempts at compromise, thus shielding the KMT from taking the blame for legislative impasse.
The PFP was the KMT's legislative agent provocateur, its shock troop.
If the KMT had simply ignored the PFP, it would have faded away long ago, never becoming anything more than the neglected bastard child of the once-popular egomaniac James Soong (
Now the shattered remnants of the party serve as a kind of monument to hubris, a testimonial of the dark hours of extremist demagoguery experienced by Taiwan's democracy.
So it was fascinating to look on as the decaying, disintegrating PFP turned on its erstwhile ally in an act of political cannibalism.
But why did they do it? Was the party's hotline to Beijing severed during last month's earthquake, like the undersea cables that connect the Internet across the Pacific?
Was it merely out of spite to the KMT?
Perhaps the simplest explanation is that the PFP is desperately seeking relevance.
The party's date with death was set when, years ago, the Legislative Yuan approved the reforms that will slash the number of legislative seats in half. Then its head popped off, long before its neck was even placed in a noose, after Soong ended his meteoric plunge into obscurity by retiring from politics and scampering off to the US.
Perhaps it was the contempt with which the KMT treated the PFP chairman during his embarrassing candidacy for the Taipei mayorship that soured the relationship. Maybe it was just personal. KMT Chairman Ma Ying-jeou (
Or maybe it was the interminable talk about a new "alliance" for the "pan-blue alliance," whatever that possibly could have meant. Most observers figured it simply meant the PFP would be consumed by the KMT, but Soong may have had different ideas.
In any case, it will be curious to see how the KMT will explain itself now that its little helper has turned tail.
It was only a short time ago that Legislative Speaker Wang Jin-pyng (
Who will the KMT blame now? Will the party finally take responsibility for its own actions? Will it stop using hollow excuses when it blocks common-sense policies, or will it try to offer compelling arguments in defending its choices?
A political party, like a person, can't shift blame forever. Eventually someone has to step up and take responsibility.
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
If you had a vision of the future where China did not dominate the global car industry, you can kiss those dreams goodbye. That is because US President Donald Trump’s promised 25 percent tariff on auto imports takes an ax to the only bits of the emerging electric vehicle (EV) supply chain that are not already dominated by Beijing. The biggest losers when the levies take effect this week would be Japan and South Korea. They account for one-third of the cars imported into the US, and as much as two-thirds of those imported from outside North America. (Mexico and Canada, while
The military is conducting its annual Han Kuang exercises in phases. The minister of national defense recently said that this year’s scenarios would simulate defending the nation against possible actions the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) might take in an invasion of Taiwan, making the threat of a speculated Chinese invasion in 2027 a heated agenda item again. That year, also referred to as the “Davidson window,” is named after then-US Indo-Pacific Command Admiral Philip Davidson, who in 2021 warned that Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) had instructed the PLA to be ready to invade Taiwan by 2027. Xi in 2017
RSS