In commenting on the mayoral elections held in Taipei and Kaohsiung, many political pundits have said that the results reflected trends among pan-green and pan-blue supporters on the issue of national identity.
The importance of national identity for voters raises questions about how best to tackle the issue.
Ruan Ming (
However, the China that must be understood is not the one that has been deliberately eulogized by pro-China media outlets, but the empire of lies depicted in L'annee du Coq: Chinois et Rebelles by French writer Guy Sorman.
As admirers of Chinese culture, most Western China experts tend to paint a rosy picture of the country.
Many of them are also leftists who loathe capitalism and yearn for the communist ideal of equality for all.
The doyen of sinology, late Harvard professor John Fairbank, was deeply puzzled by Beijing's decision to violently suppress pro-democracy demonstrations in Tiananmen Square in 1989 and said that China was too complex for Westerners to read.
Today, many Westerners fail to see the dark shadow that looms behind the bright lights of China's economic boom.
What makes Sorman different is that he is a right-wing academic who supports US neo-conservatism and loathes socialism.
He does not paint a rosy picture of China, but has the courage to criticize it instead.
When commenting on L'annee du Coq: Chinois et Rebelles, Pu Ta-chung (
More importantly, Sorman's book is based largely on first-hand research.
It reveals that in China, legal contracts are often unenforceable, the judiciary has no independence and corruption is rampant.
Sorman also mentions that once foreign businesspeople arrive in China, they begin to lose their sense of judgement and disregard the universal standards adopted by economies around the world.
Sorman finds that economic statistics are worthless in China, for they are compiled by a government that cares little about their accuracy.
For example, during the early 1990s, official Chinese statistics persistently claimed that the country's cultivated land only amounted to about 95 million hectares, a figure that gave China less arable land per capita than Bangladesh.
However, satellite photographs indicate that China has a total of 150 million hectares of arable land. By under-reporting the amount of arable land by almost one third, the Chinese authorities' purpose was to highlight the government's efficiency in feeding its people despite a considerable land "shortage."
Mao Yishi (茅以軾), a Beijing-based economist, said that although China's economy is growing at a rate of 8 percent annually, it has wreaked havoc on the environment.
The resulting land exhaustion, pollution and disease have in fact caused a decline of 10 percent. Thus, China's economic development is really a disaster.
Anyone who attempts to tell the truth in China is suppressed, either by intimidation or by force. Small wonder Sorman views China as a barbarian country.
Cao Changqing is a Chinese writer based in the US.
TRANSLATED BY DANIEL CHENG
A foreign colleague of mine asked me recently, “What is a safe distance from potential People’s Liberation Army (PLA) Rocket Force’s (PLARF) Taiwan targets?” This article will answer this question and help people living in Taiwan have a deeper understanding of the threat. Why is it important to understand PLA/PLARF targeting strategy? According to RAND analysis, the PLA’s “systems destruction warfare” focuses on crippling an adversary’s operational system by targeting its networks, especially leadership, command and control (C2) nodes, sensors, and information hubs. Admiral Samuel Paparo, commander of US Indo-Pacific Command, noted in his 15 May 2025 Sedona Forum keynote speech that, as
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) concludes his fourth visit to China since leaving office, Taiwan finds itself once again trapped in a familiar cycle of political theater. The Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) has criticized Ma’s participation in the Straits Forum as “dancing with Beijing,” while the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) defends it as an act of constitutional diplomacy. Both sides miss a crucial point: The real question is not whether Ma’s visit helps or hurts Taiwan — it is why Taiwan lacks a sophisticated, multi-track approach to one of the most complex geopolitical relationships in the world. The disagreement reduces Taiwan’s
Former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) is visiting China, where he is addressed in a few ways, but never as a former president. On Sunday, he attended the Straits Forum in Xiamen, not as a former president of Taiwan, but as a former Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) chairman. There, he met with Chinese People’s Political Consultative Conference Chairman Wang Huning (王滬寧). Presumably, Wang at least would have been aware that Ma had once been president, and yet he did not mention that fact, referring to him only as “Mr Ma Ying-jeou.” Perhaps the apparent oversight was not intended to convey a lack of
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) last week announced that the KMT was launching “Operation Patriot” in response to an unprecedented massive campaign to recall 31 KMT legislators. However, his action has also raised questions and doubts: Are these so-called “patriots” pledging allegiance to the country or to the party? While all KMT-proposed campaigns to recall Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) lawmakers have failed, and a growing number of local KMT chapter personnel have been indicted for allegedly forging petition signatures, media reports said that at least 26 recall motions against KMT legislators have passed the second signature threshold