The Allies released two important documents related to Taiwan's status during World War II: the Cairo Declaration on Dec. 1, 1943 and the Potsdam Declaration on July 26, 1945. The latter was signed by US president Harry Truman, Republic of China (ROC) president Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石) and British prime minister Winston Churchill.
These two documents provide the standard answer to the question of Taiwan's status, and are the basis for the legitimacy of the ROC's claim to rule over Taiwan.
The Cairo Declaration is similar in nature to a statement, and the document is actually entitled the Cairo Press Communique. On the other hand, the Potsdam Declaration makes it clear that it is a proclamation.
Neither document resembles the type of official international treaty normally used when territories are transferred.
Since the Cairo and Potsdam declarations are not binding treaties, they cannot provide a legal foundation for the post-war jurisdiction of Taiwan and Penghu under international law.
The subtitle of the Potsdam Declaration -- Proclamation Defining Terms for Japanese Surrender -- makes it clear that it is a proclamation, which isn't exactly the same thing as a declaration.
The biggest difference between the Potsdam Declaration and the Cairo Declaration is that the Potsdam document was signed by the US president, ROC president and the British prime minister. Nevertheless, the Potsdam Declaration is not a treaty acknowledged by international law and does not have the binding power of a treaty.
The Potsdam Declaration says that Japan shall proclaim its surrender, that the terms of the Cairo Declaration shall be carried out and that Japanese sovereignty shall be limited to the islands of Honshu, Hokkaido, Kyushu, Shikoku and "such minor islands as we determine."
After the signing of the Instrument of Surrender in Japan, the Supreme Commander for the Allied Powers issued General Order No. 1 on Sept. 2, 1945. The order was an official instruction for the handling of Japan and its colonies after the war. The order thus clearly regulated the takeover of territories after Japan's surrender.
According to General Order No. 1, when Chinese General Ho Ying-chin (
It must be noted that the surrender document clearly stated that Ho, as Chiang's representative, received the surrender on behalf of the US, the ROC, the UK, the USSR and other allies that fought Japan.
As the order clearly states, the Japanese forces within China (excluding Manchuria), Formosa and French Indochina above 16 latitude north were all required surrender to Chiang, but this should not be construed as meaning that Chiang was given sovereignty over these territories.
Hsueh Hua-yuan is the director of the Graduate Institute of Taiwan History at National Chengchi University.
Translated by Eddy Chang
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers
Gogoro Inc was once a rising star and a would-be unicorn in the years prior to its debut on the NASDAQ in 2022, as its environmentally friendly technology and stylish design attracted local young people. The electric scooter and battery swapping services provider is bracing for a major personnel shakeup following the abrupt resignation on Friday of founding chairman Horace Luke (陸學森) as chief executive officer. Luke’s departure indicates that Gogoro is sinking into the trough of unicorn disillusionment, with the company grappling with poor financial performance amid a slowdown in demand at home and setbacks in overseas expansions. About 95
RSS