I last wrote about Ma Ying-jeou (
At that time, Ma was on his European tour and trying to dance around the direct challenge of whether his first priority was the preservation of Taiwan's democracy or unification with China. Now, as new cases of alleged corruption erupt around him, Ma, the Taipei mayor and Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) chairman is still dancing. However, the number of "people" he is able to fool appears to be diminishing.
Over the past few months, Ma had tried to lead the charge against Chen Shui-bian (
Then Chen's wife was embroiled in the great Sogo coupon brouhaha. This episode went belly up as far as any concrete evidence was concerned, but that did not stop the KMT. They came back with a new ploy. Chen's wife was indicted on the charge of misuse of and/or forging receipts for the "state affairs fund." Unfortunately however, all this exploded when Ma's office was found guilty of the same practice of misuse of and/or forging receipts for the "mayoral expense fund."
Ma is now shuffling faster and faster; and though he is not going anywhere -- except possibly offstage -- that certainly is not stopping him. Note the wording he has used to explain himself. When Chen was accused of misuse of the receipt procedure it was "corruption;" when Ma is guilty of it, it is only a "blemish."
When Chen's office mishandled the procedures and receipts it was "out and out corruption;" when Ma's office did the same, it was "an administrative defect."
When Chen's wife and accountants were involved, Chen was responsible and should resign. When Ma's wife and accountants were involved, Ma stated he "knew nothing about it."
Yu Wen (
Cheng An-kuo (
Ma has continued to add to the doublespeak by saying that he "needed to shoulder administrative, political and moral responsibility for the blemish." Shoulder the responsibility? Ma is willing to shoulder the responsibility as long as all that this means is that he apologize. As for Chen, however, shouldering the responsibility means that Chen should not just apologize, but stewp down.
For those who have been in Taiwan for long enough and witnessed Ma's doublespeak, his shuffle and how his performance has always fallen short of his words, the above is nothing new.
Is the issue over? Not by a long shot. While Yu allegedly substituted receipts of his own to make his job easier; Ma's real receipts are supposed to be there.
Unfortunately, Ma's receipts could reveal how he did use the funds for personal expenses, which is definitely illegal. Conveniently for Ma, his receipts were sent to the prosecutor's office as potential evidence, which means that they are not available for public disclosure or scrutiny.
Jerome Keating is a Taiwan-based writer.
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its
RSS