If anyone can help Taiwan enter the WHO under observer status, it's going to be Margaret Chan (
Taiwanese health officials are upbeat about the prospects and pleased with the Hong Kong doctor's appointment.
"As director of Hong Kong's health department during the 2003 SARS epidemic, Chan will have a better understanding of Taiwan's public health issues and its need to be included in the international health community," said Peter Chang (張武修), head of Department of Health's Bureau of International Cooperation.
In addition, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs hopes Chan will put aside her political stance as a citizen of China and work to help Taiwan become a WHO observer.
"More and more members of the WHO have realized the importance and necessity of [our] participation in [WHO], so we expect Chan will stick to the spirit of the WHO which aims to provide good health care to all global citizens and not exclude the people of Taiwan any longer," the ministry said.
Mainland Affairs Council Chairman Joseph Wu (
"Both Hong Kong and Taiwan were affected by SARS in 2003. Since Chan is from Hong Kong, she should understand Taiwan's wish to join the WHO," he said.
However, China remains firm in its position that Taiwan has no right to join the WHO. "Our stance is clear," Jiang Yu (姜瑜), a spokeswoman for China's Foreign Ministry told reporters in Beijing after Chan's appointment was made public. "WHO is made up of sovereign states, so as a part of China, Taiwan has no right to join. This is not a decision that can be made by [Chan] alone."
Taiwan's application to join the WHO under observer status has been shot down for 10 consecutive years in the face of Chinese pressure. Taiwan has not been a member of the WHO since the Republic of China withdrew from the the UN in 1979.
Chan is now in a position to help Taiwan join WHO in some capacity, according to observers. But will she? Can she?
It's not going to be easy, as previous attempts have shown. The battle continues, and Taiwan will make a new try next year.
While the WHO can't continue to ignore the rights to basic health of Taiwan's 23 million people, justice in Geneva won't come easily or quickly, although now there's more hope with Chan.
The preamble to the WHO Constitution states: "The enjoyment of the highest attainable standard of health is one of the fundamental rights of every human being, without distinction to race, religion, political belief, economic or social condition."
It makes perfect sense therefore for Taiwan to be admitted to the world body, and the sooner the better. Those who conspire to keep Taiwan out of the WHO are working against the very spirit of the preamble itself.
If other entities such as the Vatican, the Palestinian Authority and the Red Cross can hold WHO, observer status, certainly there should be a place at the table for Taiwan's representatives, too.
Diseases recognize no boundaries, as SARS and bird flu shows. Taiwan's status as a WHO observer would not involve the sovereignty dispute with China, nor would it challenge Beijing's existing status within the WHO.
Will next year's news reports from Geneva repeat the same refrain -- that Taiwan's bid was thwarted once again after the WHO general commission decided against putting the motion on its agenda?
Chan has a chance to show her mettle. She should give Taiwan its proper place in the WHO.
Dan Bloom is a freelance writer in Taiwan.
During the US-India Strategic Partnership Forum’s third leadership summit on Aug. 31, US Deputy Secretary of State Stephen Biegun said that the US wants to partner with the other members of the Quadrilaterial Security Dialogue — Australia, India and Japan — to establish an organization similar to NATO, to “respond to ... any potential challenge from China.” He said that the US’ purpose is to work with these nations and other countries in the Indo-Pacific region to “create a critical mass around the shared values and interest of those parties,” and possibly attract more countries to establish an alliance comparable to
On August 24, 2020, the US Secretary of Defense, Mark Esper, made an important statement: “The Pentagon is Prepared for China.” Going forward, how might the Department of Defense team up with Taiwan to make itself even more prepared? No American wants to deter the next war by a paper-thin margin, and no one appreciates the value of strategic overmatch more than the war planners at the Pentagon. When the stakes are this high, you can bet they want to be super ready. In recent months, we have witnessed a veritable flood of high-level statements from US government leaders on
China has long sought shortcuts to developing semiconductor technologies and local supply chains by poaching engineers and experts from Taiwan and other nations. It is also suspected of stealing trade secrets from Taiwanese and US firms to fulfill its ambition of becoming a major player in the global semiconductor industry in the next decade. However, it takes more than just money and talent to build a semiconductor supply chain like the one which Taiwan and the US started to cultivate more than 30 years ago. Amid rising trade and technology tensions between the world’s two biggest economies, Beijing has become
With a new White House document in May — the “Strategic Approach to the People’s Republic of China” — the administration of US President Donald Trump has firmly set its hyper-competitive line to tackle geoeconomic and geostrategic rivalry, followed by several reinforcing speeches by Trump and other Cabinet-level officials. By identifying China as a near-equal rival, the strategy resonates well with the bipartisan consensus on China in today’s severely divided US. In the face of China’s rapidly growing aggression, the move is long overdue, yet relevant for the maintenance of the international “status quo.” The strategy seems to herald a new