If anyone can help Taiwan enter the WHO under observer status, it's going to be Margaret Chan (
Taiwanese health officials are upbeat about the prospects and pleased with the Hong Kong doctor's appointment.
"As director of Hong Kong's health department during the 2003 SARS epidemic, Chan will have a better understanding of Taiwan's public health issues and its need to be included in the international health community," said Peter Chang (張武修), head of Department of Health's Bureau of International Cooperation.
In addition, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs hopes Chan will put aside her political stance as a citizen of China and work to help Taiwan become a WHO observer.
"More and more members of the WHO have realized the importance and necessity of [our] participation in [WHO], so we expect Chan will stick to the spirit of the WHO which aims to provide good health care to all global citizens and not exclude the people of Taiwan any longer," the ministry said.
Mainland Affairs Council Chairman Joseph Wu (
"Both Hong Kong and Taiwan were affected by SARS in 2003. Since Chan is from Hong Kong, she should understand Taiwan's wish to join the WHO," he said.
However, China remains firm in its position that Taiwan has no right to join the WHO. "Our stance is clear," Jiang Yu (姜瑜), a spokeswoman for China's Foreign Ministry told reporters in Beijing after Chan's appointment was made public. "WHO is made up of sovereign states, so as a part of China, Taiwan has no right to join. This is not a decision that can be made by [Chan] alone."
Taiwan's application to join the WHO under observer status has been shot down for 10 consecutive years in the face of Chinese pressure. Taiwan has not been a member of the WHO since the Republic of China withdrew from the the UN in 1979.
Chan is now in a position to help Taiwan join WHO in some capacity, according to observers. But will she? Can she?
It's not going to be easy, as previous attempts have shown. The battle continues, and Taiwan will make a new try next year.
While the WHO can't continue to ignore the rights to basic health of Taiwan's 23 million people, justice in Geneva won't come easily or quickly, although now there's more hope with Chan.
The preamble to the WHO Constitution states: "The enjoyment of the highest attainable standard of health is one of the fundamental rights of every human being, without distinction to race, religion, political belief, economic or social condition."
It makes perfect sense therefore for Taiwan to be admitted to the world body, and the sooner the better. Those who conspire to keep Taiwan out of the WHO are working against the very spirit of the preamble itself.
If other entities such as the Vatican, the Palestinian Authority and the Red Cross can hold WHO, observer status, certainly there should be a place at the table for Taiwan's representatives, too.
Diseases recognize no boundaries, as SARS and bird flu shows. Taiwan's status as a WHO observer would not involve the sovereignty dispute with China, nor would it challenge Beijing's existing status within the WHO.
Will next year's news reports from Geneva repeat the same refrain -- that Taiwan's bid was thwarted once again after the WHO general commission decided against putting the motion on its agenda?
Chan has a chance to show her mettle. She should give Taiwan its proper place in the WHO.
Dan Bloom is a freelance writer in Taiwan.
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS