After first lady Wu Shu-jen (
Opinion polls show that support for the anti-corruption campaign has also dropped, which fascinated and confused me. I could feel a subtle change but was unable to explain it.
After reading the Nov. 9 open letter from Nobel laureate Lee Yuan-tseh (
In response to this letter, as with Lee's previous letters, politicians who did not want to stake out a position merely said they respect his view and appreciate his effort.
Politicians who wanted to respond labeled his views and praised or criticized him without restraint. They saw only their own stance and did not sense the social significance of the letter.
I want to thank Lee for writing the letter at a time of crisis in Taiwan. Through his letters, Lee has always observed Taiwan's developments patiently and optimistically, despite his own concerns.
I believe this is the attitude of most good and decent Taiwanese people. Unfortunately, confrontation can and does occur, caused by radicals on both ends of the political spectrum. But despite such confrontation, I believe that Lee sees how, in the long-term, good people create positive values.
From an overall perspective, there is no lack of criticism and freedom in Taiwan. What we do lack is a spiritual force that upholds positive values.
In the past, both the ruling and opposition camps failed to build and nurture positive values. Nobody talked about this before, but now Lee has highlighted the issue.
I hope that people will pay attention when they read two important passages in Lee's letter. The first says "On a deeper level, this crisis is a democratic result of Taiwan's power transfer."
The second says "Today, the judiciary has demonstrated an independence unprecedented in Taiwan. The investigation and indictment of the first family -- although that does not mean that they are guilty -- represents a giant leap for judicial independence; a great result of the power transfer in 2000."
Positive values can only grow with the help of positive attitudes. Lee reminded us that the indictments were a tangible result of Taiwan's power transfer and a key turning point for building positive values.
This letter shares similar ideas with Lee's previous letter in late June, in which he condemned the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) for "too few achievements and too much corruption."
On the other hand, he worried that perhaps the opposition was too eager to recall the president, saying that Taiwan's political situation would continue to tread water if the two camps constantly went opposite ways and that he did not see the possibility of forming positive values for Taiwan at that time.
However, in his recent letter, Lee's optimism and determination are apparent because he can now see the possibility for building positive values.
I now understand why people have stopped discussing whether the president should step down and why the "reds" have lost support: these issues reflected an anxiety caused by the absence of positive values in Taiwanese society.
Taiwanese are fundamentally good and decent. When a reliable, positive value such as that exhibited by the judicial system emerges, we must nurture it patiently so it can become stronger. Lee's letter showed us that this is possible.
Wang Szu-hsun is chief editor at Ruguo Publishing.
Translated by Eddy Chang
As strategic tensions escalate across the vast Indo-Pacific region, Taiwan has emerged as more than a potential flashpoint. It is the fulcrum upon which the credibility of the evolving American-led strategy of integrated deterrence now rests. How the US and regional powers like Japan respond to Taiwan’s defense, and how credible the deterrent against Chinese aggression proves to be, will profoundly shape the Indo-Pacific security architecture for years to come. A successful defense of Taiwan through strengthened deterrence in the Indo-Pacific would enhance the credibility of the US-led alliance system and underpin America’s global preeminence, while a failure of integrated deterrence would
It is being said every second day: The ongoing recall campaign in Taiwan — where citizens are trying to collect enough signatures to trigger re-elections for a number of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislators — is orchestrated by the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP), or even President William Lai (賴清德) himself. The KMT makes the claim, and foreign media and analysts repeat it. However, they never show any proof — because there is not any. It is alarming how easily academics, journalists and experts toss around claims that amount to accusing a democratic government of conspiracy — without a shred of evidence. These
Taiwan is confronting escalating threats from its behemoth neighbor. Last month, the Chinese People’s Liberation Army conducted live-fire drills in the East China Sea, practicing blockades and precision strikes on simulated targets, while its escalating cyberattacks targeting government, financial and telecommunication systems threaten to disrupt Taiwan’s digital infrastructure. The mounting geopolitical pressure underscores Taiwan’s need to strengthen its defense capabilities to deter possible aggression and improve civilian preparedness. The consequences of inadequate preparation have been made all too clear by the tragic situation in Ukraine. Taiwan can build on its successful COVID-19 response, marked by effective planning and execution, to enhance
Since taking office, US President Donald Trump has upheld the core goals of “making America safer, stronger, and more prosperous,” fully implementing an “America first” policy. Countries have responded cautiously to the fresh style and rapid pace of the new Trump administration. The US has prioritized reindustrialization, building a stronger US role in the Indo-Pacific, and countering China’s malicious influence. This has created a high degree of alignment between the interests of Taiwan and the US in security, economics, technology and other spheres. Taiwan must properly understand the Trump administration’s intentions and coordinate, connect and correspond with US strategic goals.
RSS