Over the past years I have read a few articles in the Taipei Times regarding gender issues, but outside of stating the need for some type of gender policy, the points that were made were vague. This alone should provide evidence suggesting that Taiwan is not ready to implement a gender policy.
In a society built on filial piety, one that makes no bones about having bikini-clad betel nut beauties selling their wares all over Taiwan, gender issues remain a profound mystery, a Western enigma.
First, there needs to be an awareness of "gender" and "gender stereotypes."
Next, laws pertaining to divorced couples in Taiwan must be abolished and remade with gender equity in mind, otherwise a gender policy would be for naught.
As an example of the hypocrisy surrounding gender policy, let's look at a couple of examples. On Taiwanese TV commercials, when was the last time you saw a man doing the laundry, washing floors or changing a baby's diapers?
In particular, a new commercial in which a fortune teller reads lottery numbers in a crystal ball floored me. This commercial only perpetuates the old myths that women only want money, that women cannot be trusted, and that men are only good for their money.
And the ubiquitous skin-whitening commercials for women only teach women that their true skin color is something to be ashamed of and, moreover, that white skin is the supreme beauty standard.
The commercials for household cleaners only reinforce the concepts that women are solely responsible for cleaning the home, that men are lazy about performing household duties, and that women are only good for one thing -- keeping a man's castle clean and taking care of his heirs.
Gender policy in Taiwan? What for? At this point in history, a gender policy implemented in Taiwan would not be worth the paper it was printed on.
Politicians that visit other countries and attend gender symposiums come back with some good ideas, but cannot possibly implement them because of Taiwan's unique culture, religions and traditions.
I could run off a litany of other gender issues here, but the time for implementing a gender policy is not now.
Instead, it is time to implement a program to teach students what "gender issues" are. When there is a visible and palpable change in Taiwanese society toward stereotypes of men and women, that will be the appropriate time to implement an official gender policy for the good of all.
Kevin Larson
Chiayi
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
If you had a vision of the future where China did not dominate the global car industry, you can kiss those dreams goodbye. That is because US President Donald Trump’s promised 25 percent tariff on auto imports takes an ax to the only bits of the emerging electric vehicle (EV) supply chain that are not already dominated by Beijing. The biggest losers when the levies take effect this week would be Japan and South Korea. They account for one-third of the cars imported into the US, and as much as two-thirds of those imported from outside North America. (Mexico and Canada, while
I have heard people equate the government’s stance on resisting forced unification with China or the conditional reinstatement of the military court system with the rise of the Nazis before World War II. The comparison is absurd. There is no meaningful parallel between the government and Nazi Germany, nor does such a mindset exist within the general public in Taiwan. It is important to remember that the German public bore some responsibility for the horrors of the Holocaust. Post-World War II Germany’s transitional justice efforts were rooted in a national reckoning and introspection. Many Jews were sent to concentration camps not
RSS