Over the past years I have read a few articles in the Taipei Times regarding gender issues, but outside of stating the need for some type of gender policy, the points that were made were vague. This alone should provide evidence suggesting that Taiwan is not ready to implement a gender policy.
In a society built on filial piety, one that makes no bones about having bikini-clad betel nut beauties selling their wares all over Taiwan, gender issues remain a profound mystery, a Western enigma.
First, there needs to be an awareness of "gender" and "gender stereotypes."
Next, laws pertaining to divorced couples in Taiwan must be abolished and remade with gender equity in mind, otherwise a gender policy would be for naught.
As an example of the hypocrisy surrounding gender policy, let's look at a couple of examples. On Taiwanese TV commercials, when was the last time you saw a man doing the laundry, washing floors or changing a baby's diapers?
In particular, a new commercial in which a fortune teller reads lottery numbers in a crystal ball floored me. This commercial only perpetuates the old myths that women only want money, that women cannot be trusted, and that men are only good for their money.
And the ubiquitous skin-whitening commercials for women only teach women that their true skin color is something to be ashamed of and, moreover, that white skin is the supreme beauty standard.
The commercials for household cleaners only reinforce the concepts that women are solely responsible for cleaning the home, that men are lazy about performing household duties, and that women are only good for one thing -- keeping a man's castle clean and taking care of his heirs.
Gender policy in Taiwan? What for? At this point in history, a gender policy implemented in Taiwan would not be worth the paper it was printed on.
Politicians that visit other countries and attend gender symposiums come back with some good ideas, but cannot possibly implement them because of Taiwan's unique culture, religions and traditions.
I could run off a litany of other gender issues here, but the time for implementing a gender policy is not now.
Instead, it is time to implement a program to teach students what "gender issues" are. When there is a visible and palpable change in Taiwanese society toward stereotypes of men and women, that will be the appropriate time to implement an official gender policy for the good of all.
Kevin Larson
Chiayi
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS