The Golden Horse awards are upon us again, but there is little point going over old ground criticizing the event for its "Greater China" mentality and reduction of worthy Taiwanese movies to bit players. As long as there are celebrities to exploit and be exploited by, the deeper meaning of these outdated gongs will pass with little criticism.
It is therefore fitting to turn to the little-discussed agency that allows these and all other films and TV programs to be screened in this country. The Government Information Office's (GIO) film classification board is a rare success story within an administrative organ that should have been abolished years ago.
While the GIO has come under regular and largely justified attack from all sides of politics for its activities since the election of President Chen Shui-bian (
Armed with four classification categories, the board has over the years adapted remarkably well to the permissive content that has come from the West, Japan and Hong Kong.
As an illustration of this, back in 1994 Steven Spielberg's Schindler's List became the first film to break the pubic hair taboo on the big screen. To its credit, the board eventually passed the film without cuts; unlike more autocratic states such as Malaysia, Taiwanese viewers were able to see depictions of naked Jews of all ages being herded into labor camps and other places by Nazi guards.
Today, as with classification regimes in Britain, Australia and Canada, the Taiwanese board has a system in place that minimizes cutting -- and therefore shows greater respect to filmmaker and audience. Notable is the decreasing number of films suffering cuts to be screened at all or to receive a lower classification.
A notable exception in recent months is The Texas Chainsaw Massacre: The Beginning, which had four of its most grisly scenes edited or removed to avoid a ban. The classifiers even banned the trailer -- which was rated "G" in the US.
But other recent offerings of horror and violence from Hollywood -- Saw III, Hostel and the remake of The Hills Have Eyes -- have been screened uncut in the versions submitted to the board, despite provocative and protracted scenes of torture.
The board remains more conservative on sexual matters, though the passing of Tsai Ming-liang's (
The board's conduct offers a salutary example of how government departments can work well in balancing the needs of the marketplace and the expectations of the community and movie lovers. And while there is a strong case to be made that restrictions at the high end of the system are too strict, it is clear that the overall direction the board has taken bodes well for freedom of expression -- and entertainment -- in this country.
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its
RSS