There are plenty of things to find depressing about Taiwanese politics.
It is pointless to try to analyze this country's political situation through the lens of right and wrong, good against evil, right versus left, clean or dirty, or even just competent and incompetent.
The politician who today thunders against corruption is one who has been investigated for stealing millions of dollars from his own party -- like People First Party Chairman James Soong (
Conversely, a man who rises to power on a platform of clean government and humanitarian values -- like President Chen Shui-bian (
So when, as now, accusations fly back and forth, implicating virtually every major political figure in some form of malfeasance or incompetence, one can be forgiven for thinking that all of it is probably true.
A familiarity with Taiwanese politics, much like Taiwanese history, will show that there are remarkably few good guys -- just a lot of compromised, flawed human beings.
Plenty of local commentators like to draw on their Confucian learning and spill gallons of ink decrying the flawed nature of mankind. They call for politicians and the media to exercise self-restraint, to prevent "social chaos," to be virtuous leaders.
This is part of the problem. No amount of hand-wringing is going to bring about changes in human character. Taiwan's governmental problems are the result of systemic flaws, not personality issues.
Perhaps this endless repetition of useless Confucian mumbo-jumbo, with its focus on stability and attempts to ossify society, would be useful if this country were a utopia with a flawless political system. But Taiwan has serious problems with its government, which if left unaddressed could undermine its democratic nature.
It is too bad that the writings of Lu Xun (
Written in 1918, A Madman's Diary is a devastating and wry condemnation of Confucianism and traditional Chinese culture. The book describes a young student studying the Chinese "classics" as he prepares for an exam to become a bureaucrat during the Qing Dynasty.
But as he reads his texts, all he can see are the words "eat people." He becomes convinced that he is surrounded by cannibals, and is driven mad in the process.
The point, of course, is that the oppressive traditionalism of Chinese feudal society, with its emphasis on conformity, hierarchy and continuity -- epitomized by the works of Confucius -- was a bar to progress and reform. Individualism is crushed and independent thought is yoked with the chains of orthodoxy.
It should be clear from the sheer pervasiveness of corruption, incompetence and plain idiocy exhibited by the nation's politicians that the status quo isn't working. What is needed is not an illusory "stability," but real reform.
It isn't difficult to think of radical changes that Taiwan needs. Here is an example, which is quite pertinent at the moment: Revoke the legal immunity enjoyed by legislators and the president.
If you're driving a schoolbus toward a cliff, why not consider changing course?
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
If you had a vision of the future where China did not dominate the global car industry, you can kiss those dreams goodbye. That is because US President Donald Trump’s promised 25 percent tariff on auto imports takes an ax to the only bits of the emerging electric vehicle (EV) supply chain that are not already dominated by Beijing. The biggest losers when the levies take effect this week would be Japan and South Korea. They account for one-third of the cars imported into the US, and as much as two-thirds of those imported from outside North America. (Mexico and Canada, while
I have heard people equate the government’s stance on resisting forced unification with China or the conditional reinstatement of the military court system with the rise of the Nazis before World War II. The comparison is absurd. There is no meaningful parallel between the government and Nazi Germany, nor does such a mindset exist within the general public in Taiwan. It is important to remember that the German public bore some responsibility for the horrors of the Holocaust. Post-World War II Germany’s transitional justice efforts were rooted in a national reckoning and introspection. Many Jews were sent to concentration camps not
RSS