There are plenty of things to find depressing about Taiwanese politics.
It is pointless to try to analyze this country's political situation through the lens of right and wrong, good against evil, right versus left, clean or dirty, or even just competent and incompetent.
The politician who today thunders against corruption is one who has been investigated for stealing millions of dollars from his own party -- like People First Party Chairman James Soong (
Conversely, a man who rises to power on a platform of clean government and humanitarian values -- like President Chen Shui-bian (
So when, as now, accusations fly back and forth, implicating virtually every major political figure in some form of malfeasance or incompetence, one can be forgiven for thinking that all of it is probably true.
A familiarity with Taiwanese politics, much like Taiwanese history, will show that there are remarkably few good guys -- just a lot of compromised, flawed human beings.
Plenty of local commentators like to draw on their Confucian learning and spill gallons of ink decrying the flawed nature of mankind. They call for politicians and the media to exercise self-restraint, to prevent "social chaos," to be virtuous leaders.
This is part of the problem. No amount of hand-wringing is going to bring about changes in human character. Taiwan's governmental problems are the result of systemic flaws, not personality issues.
Perhaps this endless repetition of useless Confucian mumbo-jumbo, with its focus on stability and attempts to ossify society, would be useful if this country were a utopia with a flawless political system. But Taiwan has serious problems with its government, which if left unaddressed could undermine its democratic nature.
It is too bad that the writings of Lu Xun (
Written in 1918, A Madman's Diary is a devastating and wry condemnation of Confucianism and traditional Chinese culture. The book describes a young student studying the Chinese "classics" as he prepares for an exam to become a bureaucrat during the Qing Dynasty.
But as he reads his texts, all he can see are the words "eat people." He becomes convinced that he is surrounded by cannibals, and is driven mad in the process.
The point, of course, is that the oppressive traditionalism of Chinese feudal society, with its emphasis on conformity, hierarchy and continuity -- epitomized by the works of Confucius -- was a bar to progress and reform. Individualism is crushed and independent thought is yoked with the chains of orthodoxy.
It should be clear from the sheer pervasiveness of corruption, incompetence and plain idiocy exhibited by the nation's politicians that the status quo isn't working. What is needed is not an illusory "stability," but real reform.
It isn't difficult to think of radical changes that Taiwan needs. Here is an example, which is quite pertinent at the moment: Revoke the legal immunity enjoyed by legislators and the president.
If you're driving a schoolbus toward a cliff, why not consider changing course?
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS