For those present it was a memorable night. On March 17, 2000, the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) was holding its election-eve rally in support of its presidential candidate Chen Shui-bian (
The location was the Zhongshan Soccer Stadium in Taipei. Behind the stage was a stand full of the party faithful and representatives of civic organizations. One by one, these groups ran on stage to pump up the crowd, witnessed by a VIP group at the front that included foreign media and academics.
A number of celebrities took the stage, carefully chosen for their appeal across the ethnic divide. Yang Chuan-kuang (
As interminable as election rallies can be, this one was something special, and a surprise had been promised to finish the night.
That surprise was a video endorsement by Academia Sinica president Lee Yuan-tseh (
The choice was hardly difficult. Of Chen's two main opponents, one was a man who in most countries would already have found himself in jail; the other was a man who in most countries would be denounced as unfit for high office, if not as a traitor.
Even so, Lee's support seemed to lend Chen a last boost in credibility -- 12 hours before voting stations opened. Lee's injection into the campaign has since been mythologized as significant, if not decisive.
In retrospect it is unclear that Lee's support affected the result, as close as it was. But Lee's reputation was enhanced -- not so much as a kingmaker as a person of wisdom who had the needs of the average Taiwanese in mind as much as those of the ruling elite or the academic world.
His role in the Chen administration therefore became more influential as he attempted to ease cross-strait tensions and push for other reforms.
Six-and-a-half years later and the cycle of support and abandonment is complete. Lee, no longer head of Academia Sinica, has urged Chen to resign over the scandals besetting the Presidential Office.
For Chen, though painful, Lee's appeal is merely one of a series of personal blows and can therefore be placed in some sort of perspective.
But Chen's constitutional position remains unchanged, and assuming he survives the third recall motion, his decision to stay or step down should be made with the interests of the nation in mind, not the degree of regard in which he is held by a scientist, even one as venerable as Lee.
Lee's currency as a moral arbiter has also been compromised -- not by any error of commission on his part, but by the fact that his political agenda was never more than half-fulfilled, notably the naive assumption that goodwill toward Beijing would have any meaningful effect.
There is something rather tragic about the Chen-Lee relationship. Chen has been stained by serving his politically fractured country, while Lee's reputation -- for most people -- has only been enhanced. It is hoped that Lee, as he attends his overseas conference with his comfortable scientist's aura, will understand this, and especially that he only ever gained from his association with the president.
The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) continues to bully Taiwan by conducting military drills extremely close to Taiwan in late May 2024 and announcing a legal opinion in June on how they would treat “Taiwan Independence diehards” according to the PRC’s Criminal Code. This article will describe how China’s Anaconda Strategy of psychological and legal asphyxiation is employed. The CCP’s People’s Liberation Army (PLA) and Chinese Coast Guard (CCG) conducted a “punishment military exercise” against Taiwan called “Joint Sword 2024A” from 23-24 May 2024, just three days after President William Lai (賴清德) of the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) was sworn in and
Former US president Donald Trump’s comments that Taiwan hollowed out the US semiconductor industry are incorrect. That misunderstanding could impact the future of one of the world’s most important relationships and end up aiding China at a time it is working hard to push its own tech sector to catch up. “Taiwan took our chip business from us,” the returnee US presidential contender told Bloomberg Businessweek in an interview published this week. The remarks came after the Republican nominee was asked whether he would defend Taiwan against China. It is not the first time he has said this about the nation’s
In a recent interview with the Malaysian Chinese-language newspaper Sin Chew Daily, former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) called President William Lai (賴清德) “naive.” As always with Ma, one must first deconstruct what he is saying to fully understand the parallel universe he insists on defending. Who is being “naive,” Lai or Ma? The quickest way is to confront Ma with a series of pointed questions that force him to take clear stands on the complex issues involved and prevent him from his usual ramblings. Regarding China and Taiwan, the media should first begin with questions like these: “Did the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT)
The Yomiuri Shimbun, the newspaper with the largest daily circulation in Japan, on Thursday last week published an article saying that an unidentified high-ranking Japanese official openly spoke of an analysis that the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) needs less than a week, not a month, to invade Taiwan with its amphibious forces. Reportedly, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida has already been advised of the analysis, which was based on the PLA’s military exercises last summer. A Yomiuri analysis of unclassified satellite photographs confirmed that the PLA has already begun necessary base repairs and maintenance, and is conducting amphibious operation exercises