At a recent press conference, American Institute in Taiwan Director Stephen Young stated that the Legislative Yuan should promptly pass the arms procurement bill and strengthen Taiwan's defensive capabilities. His comments came under attack from the pan-blue camp, and some have even called for Young to be sent home.
An editorial in the Chinese-language United Daily News stated that "the Legislative Yuan should not pass the arms procurement bill this session." The People First Party (PFP) even declared that if a bill on direct flights between Taiwan and China was not passed, they would not consider passing the arms bill.
Everybody is aware that there is a marked military imbalance across the Taiwan Strait. China's annual military budget exceeds US$90 billion (NT$2.89 trillion) making it the third-largest in the world. China not only has 800 missiles deployed and trained on Taiwan, it also plans to have three aircraft carriers within 10 years.
In the face of this nearby enemy, Taiwan should naturally strengthen its national defense by passing the arms budget. It should also call a spade a spade and view China as an enemy, as well as strengthen cooperation with the US military. This is especially true because as China's economy takes off, many countries are scared to offend Beijing because of their business interests. In a situation where only the US dares to sell Taipei weapons, the ruling and opposition parties ought to focus on bilateral military relations with Washington.
Instead, even though the US president authorized the orginal weapons package five years ago, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and PFP have blocked the bill in the legislature 61 times. What other legislature in the world is willing to put national security at this sort of risk?
Young's comments caused those pan-blue lawmakers who care nothing about China's threat to national security to shout about "defending the sovereignty of the Republic of China [ROC]." They seem to have forgotten that on Double Ten National Day, they had made a tremendous ruckus in front of Young and other foreign dignitaries, showing no respect whatsoever for the country.
Now they righteously play up respect for the nation and its sovereignty, but do they really care about either? When President Chen Shui-bian's (
When the planes carrying then-KMT chairman Lien Chan (
These people not only fail to speak sensibly, they fit the classical definition of cowards. As the old Chinese saying goes, they "behave like a hooligan in front of a gentleman, and when faced with a bully act like his grandson."
Seeing the pan-blue's unconcealed display of anti-US and pro-China sentiment leaves the onlooker baffled. Dictator Chiang Kai-shek (
Is it not the KMT and PFP who, unhappy that Taiwanese people are in power, have unhesitatingly embraced the CCP, gambled with the ROC's security, turned their backs on the anti-communism of the two Chiangs and forgotten their own roots?
Cao Changqing is a freelance journalist and Chinese dissident traveling in the US.
Translated by Jason Cox
Why is Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) not a “happy camper” these days regarding Taiwan? Taiwanese have not become more “CCP friendly” in response to the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) use of spies and graft by the United Front Work Department, intimidation conducted by the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) and the Armed Police/Coast Guard, and endless subversive political warfare measures, including cyber-attacks, economic coercion, and diplomatic isolation. The percentage of Taiwanese that prefer the status quo or prefer moving towards independence continues to rise — 76 percent as of December last year. According to National Chengchi University (NCCU) polling, the Taiwanese
It would be absurd to claim to see a silver lining behind every US President Donald Trump cloud. Those clouds are too many, too dark and too dangerous. All the same, viewed from a domestic political perspective, there is a clear emerging UK upside to Trump’s efforts at crashing the post-Cold War order. It might even get a boost from Thursday’s Washington visit by British Prime Minister Keir Starmer. In July last year, when Starmer became prime minister, the Labour Party was rigidly on the defensive about Europe. Brexit was seen as an electorally unstable issue for a party whose priority
US President Donald Trump is systematically dismantling the network of multilateral institutions, organizations and agreements that have helped prevent a third world war for more than 70 years. Yet many governments are twisting themselves into knots trying to downplay his actions, insisting that things are not as they seem and that even if they are, confronting the menace in the White House simply is not an option. Disagreement must be carefully disguised to avoid provoking his wrath. For the British political establishment, the convenient excuse is the need to preserve the UK’s “special relationship” with the US. Following their White House
US President Donald Trump’s return to the White House has brought renewed scrutiny to the Taiwan-US semiconductor relationship with his claim that Taiwan “stole” the US chip business and threats of 100 percent tariffs on foreign-made processors. For Taiwanese and industry leaders, understanding those developments in their full context is crucial while maintaining a clear vision of Taiwan’s role in the global technology ecosystem. The assertion that Taiwan “stole” the US’ semiconductor industry fundamentally misunderstands the evolution of global technology manufacturing. Over the past four decades, Taiwan’s semiconductor industry, led by Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), has grown through legitimate means
RSS