The bickering over the purchase of weapons from the US has been going on for over two years. Last week, the bill allowing for that purchase was struck down yet again. This is nothing less than frustrating, and one wonders if it might not turn into and endless, inextricable mess. It is perhaps time we started thinking about what the impact of this quagmire will be.
Some people already say that the remarks made by American Institute in Taiwan Director Stephen Young last week are part of those consequences. Some construe Young's statement as an attempt to humiliate the nation or perhaps even apply overt pressure.
For my part, I do appreciate the director's stern warning and take it very seriously. One can easily imagine the US' patience running short on the issue. Like an untrustworthy customer, Taiwan placed an order early on but then bargained with the salesman, the US, for five years.
Why couldn't the US' impatience make sense to us? We cannot deceive ourselves into thinking that the US will wait indefinitely for us to make up our mind. In fact, it is not altogether infeasible that all of a sudden the US will pack its things up, withdraw its promise to protect us, and thenceforth refuse to deal with us, period.
Young's comments provided a timely reminder of that.
Let's look at the arms procurement bill -- and the failure to pass it -- from another angle: that of all-out defense. In light of the threat that Taiwan faces from across the Strait, it is crucial that we focus our minds on ensuring the defense of the nation, not only in terms of military capacity but -- and perhaps more importantly -- in the spiritual will to do so. This concept requires a strong belief that we possess a potent national defense apparatus.
However, at present, an appeal to all-out defense would awaken shame and embarrassment at the poor state of our weaponry. In fact, if this were to continue, it is possible that the national defense mechanism would lose people's support.
The decision to purchase weaponry needs to be made with a calm and rational mind. It certainly shouldn't be put aside -- or expedited -- out of political considerations.
Let's all hope that the arms procurement bill will be passed soon so that we can transform the nation's overall defense capabilities into something we can rely on and be proud of.
Winnie Hung
Taipei
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS