The bickering over the purchase of weapons from the US has been going on for over two years. Last week, the bill allowing for that purchase was struck down yet again. This is nothing less than frustrating, and one wonders if it might not turn into and endless, inextricable mess. It is perhaps time we started thinking about what the impact of this quagmire will be.
Some people already say that the remarks made by American Institute in Taiwan Director Stephen Young last week are part of those consequences. Some construe Young's statement as an attempt to humiliate the nation or perhaps even apply overt pressure.
For my part, I do appreciate the director's stern warning and take it very seriously. One can easily imagine the US' patience running short on the issue. Like an untrustworthy customer, Taiwan placed an order early on but then bargained with the salesman, the US, for five years.
Why couldn't the US' impatience make sense to us? We cannot deceive ourselves into thinking that the US will wait indefinitely for us to make up our mind. In fact, it is not altogether infeasible that all of a sudden the US will pack its things up, withdraw its promise to protect us, and thenceforth refuse to deal with us, period.
Young's comments provided a timely reminder of that.
Let's look at the arms procurement bill -- and the failure to pass it -- from another angle: that of all-out defense. In light of the threat that Taiwan faces from across the Strait, it is crucial that we focus our minds on ensuring the defense of the nation, not only in terms of military capacity but -- and perhaps more importantly -- in the spiritual will to do so. This concept requires a strong belief that we possess a potent national defense apparatus.
However, at present, an appeal to all-out defense would awaken shame and embarrassment at the poor state of our weaponry. In fact, if this were to continue, it is possible that the national defense mechanism would lose people's support.
The decision to purchase weaponry needs to be made with a calm and rational mind. It certainly shouldn't be put aside -- or expedited -- out of political considerations.
Let's all hope that the arms procurement bill will be passed soon so that we can transform the nation's overall defense capabilities into something we can rely on and be proud of.
Winnie Hung
Taipei
Why is Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) not a “happy camper” these days regarding Taiwan? Taiwanese have not become more “CCP friendly” in response to the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) use of spies and graft by the United Front Work Department, intimidation conducted by the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) and the Armed Police/Coast Guard, and endless subversive political warfare measures, including cyber-attacks, economic coercion, and diplomatic isolation. The percentage of Taiwanese that prefer the status quo or prefer moving towards independence continues to rise — 76 percent as of December last year. According to National Chengchi University (NCCU) polling, the Taiwanese
It would be absurd to claim to see a silver lining behind every US President Donald Trump cloud. Those clouds are too many, too dark and too dangerous. All the same, viewed from a domestic political perspective, there is a clear emerging UK upside to Trump’s efforts at crashing the post-Cold War order. It might even get a boost from Thursday’s Washington visit by British Prime Minister Keir Starmer. In July last year, when Starmer became prime minister, the Labour Party was rigidly on the defensive about Europe. Brexit was seen as an electorally unstable issue for a party whose priority
US President Donald Trump is systematically dismantling the network of multilateral institutions, organizations and agreements that have helped prevent a third world war for more than 70 years. Yet many governments are twisting themselves into knots trying to downplay his actions, insisting that things are not as they seem and that even if they are, confronting the menace in the White House simply is not an option. Disagreement must be carefully disguised to avoid provoking his wrath. For the British political establishment, the convenient excuse is the need to preserve the UK’s “special relationship” with the US. Following their White House
US President Donald Trump’s return to the White House has brought renewed scrutiny to the Taiwan-US semiconductor relationship with his claim that Taiwan “stole” the US chip business and threats of 100 percent tariffs on foreign-made processors. For Taiwanese and industry leaders, understanding those developments in their full context is crucial while maintaining a clear vision of Taiwan’s role in the global technology ecosystem. The assertion that Taiwan “stole” the US’ semiconductor industry fundamentally misunderstands the evolution of global technology manufacturing. Over the past four decades, Taiwan’s semiconductor industry, led by Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), has grown through legitimate means
RSS