American Institute in Taiwan Director Stephen Young put the cat among the pigeons last Thursday when he held a press conference to talk frankly about the arms procurement bill.
The gist of his message was that after five years the Bush administration is getting fed up with the string of broken promises and inaction from the opposition concerning passage of the bill.
Young's words were unusually blunt, but as he told those present, China has not been wasting time in upgrading its military arsenal during the same period, and Taiwan should appreciate that the US is willing to sell it arms at all.
The US wants and needs Taiwan to have an adequate defense capability so that Taipei can one day bargain with Beijing from a position of strength or, in the event of any conflict with China, hold on until the US arrives to help the nation defend itself.
Young's words unsurprisingly upset the pan-blue camp, but since the budgets have been revised in accordance with its demands, the pan-blues have no excuse to vacillate any longer.
The linking of the bill to prosecutor Eric Chen's (
All this latest episode has done is again underline Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Ma Ying-jeou's (馬英九) impotence in the face of party hardliners. All his talk of a "reasonable" arms budget and promises to review the bill have amounted to nothing.
In response to Young, Ma said: "The Republic of China [ROC] is a sovereign country ... The right of the Legislative Yuan to review the bill should be respected."
But it is the pan-blue camp that has not respected that right, blocking the bill from being reviewed.
Ma and the rest of the pan-blues no doubt harbor profound unease at the fact that the ROC remains a "sovereign country" only because of US support. Those KMT legislators who show blatant disregard for Taiwan's security by blocking the bill would not occupy their privileged positions today were it not for the US' economic and military commitment to this country.
One possible reason for their recent behavior is that they are trying to sabotage relations with the US to make the Democratic Progressive Party government look incompetent in the eyes of the electorate and Washington. But this could backfire, as many in Taiwan value a strong relationship with the US.
On the other hand, it could be part of a naive plan to unseat Young, who is disliked by the pan-blue camp because of his perceived pro-Taiwan stance and the fact that he is knowledgeable about local affairs.
The People First Party became upset after he criticized Chairman James Soong's (
What it boils down to is that the pan-blues do not like the US having a clued-up man in Taiwan who tells Washington exactly what is going on and does not pander to their every whim.
Thankfully, the State Department's statement on Friday indicates that Young has the full backing of the US government. So, if that is the pan-blues' aim, then they are likely to fail.
If the electorate takes the State Department's words to heart and "hold their leaders responsible" for these shenanigans, the political space for pan-blue hardliners will shrink. The first test of this process will be the Taipei mayoral election.
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS