BenQ's disastrous takeover of German electronics company Siemens AG's handset unit, which cost the mobile phone maker NT$25 billion (US$750.8 million), shocked Taiwan. It has also prompted other Taiwanese companies that intend to go global and establish international brand recognition by acquiring foreign companies to think carefully before taking action.
However, using foreign acquisitions as a form of direct international investment has already become an irreversible global trend. The US$297 billion in worldwide foreign acquisitions in 2003 accounted for 53.2 percent of total foreign investment. That figure rose to US$716.3 billion last year to account for an incredible 78.2 percent of total foreign investment.
Foreign acquisitions are especially big in the EU, where total spending on them rose to US$445.1 billion last year. The biggest players were Britain (US$171.7 billion), Germany (US$63.1 billion), Italy (US$41 billion), France (US$33.2 billion), the Netherlands (US$29 billion) and Spain (US$23.6 billion).
But foreign acquisitions among Asian countries fall far short of Western Europe. Japan's total foreign acquisitions only reached US$2.5 billion and Taiwan had a mere US$760 million.
Are acquisitions the ideal way of expanding abroad? They certainly make it faster to break into a new foreign market by lessening the work and risks of establishing a foreign office or factory, such as finding a location, filing applications to build facilities, recruiting employees and actually constructing the buildings.
However, if the differences in corporate culture are too extreme, the consequences may be difficult to deal with. This is one of the reasons why most foreign acquisitions by US and European companies take place in Europe and the US instead of in Asia, and even when they do come to Asia, they take place in more internationalized locales like Hong Kong and Singapore.
The limited foreign acquisitions in other areas of Asia reveals how cautious international enterprises are. Even the foreign banks that have acquired Taiwanese banks in recent years have needed years of experience investing here and an understanding of the nature of Taiwanese banks before committing.
BenQ's gobbling up of Siemens' handset unit was risky and the consequences have confirmed the thinking of many people at the time of the purchase.
Speed is becoming ever more important in a globalizing world. Investing in international markets by setting up factories can take years, so shortening the process by acquiring another company has its advantages. However, businesses need to be forward-looking, have a long-term global strategy and be willing to develop talented employees who are familiar with the cultures of the countries in which they operate. Simply acquiring a foreign company without taking these factors into consideration will likely end in disappointment.
South Korean electronics company Samsung established a joint venture in Portugal in 1982, invested in the US in 1984 and then continued to invest in Mexico, Central Europe, Eastern Europe and Southeast Asia. However, it didn't start expanding through acquisitions until 1990.
Singapore's state-run Temasek Holdings investment company now controls a total of US$80 billion, which it invests in enterprises in 48 different industries throughout the world, including the US, Europe, Asia and Australia, making it Singapore's biggest foreign investor. Since 1974, gains from compound interest have reached 18 percent.
We have a lot to learn from the acquisition examples of BenQ, Samsung and Temasek Holdings.
Tu Jenn-hwa is an associate professor in the Graduate Institute of National Development at National Taiwan University.
Translated by Marc Langer
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its
RSS