It has long been apparent that the People First Party's (PFP) agenda has nothing to do with serving the interests of this country. So the question becomes this: Whose interests does the party serve?
It would be easy to write off the PFP as a personality cult designed to flatter the voracious ego and dangerous political ambitions of its chairman, James Soong (
But watching the PFP's legislative caucus this week, it becomes clear that there is another agenda behind the party's actions.
There has been much speculation on a secret deal between the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the PFP last week. Reportedly, this backroom deal involved the PFP blocking a bill on stolen assets designed to divest the KMT of its illicit wealth, while the KMT agreed to block a supplemental budget that would have made a token gesture at procuring several major weapons packages from the US.
The KMT did indeed block the arms bill, but the PFP did not attempt to block the stolen assets bill. Whether or not there had been a secret agreement, it was clear from the reaction of Legislative Speaker Wang Jin-pyng (
So whose interests would be served by the PFP betraying its erstwhile ally? Who has something to gain by keeping Taiwan as defenseless as possible and trying to exacerbate political divisions?
The clear answer, of course, is China.
Look at the way the PFP has thrown itself into the campaign to oust President Chen Shui-bian (
And on Double Ten National Day, which party's members caused the greatest disturbance, becoming violent and screaming "depose Chen"? Why, the PFP's, of course.
Given that the anti-Chen campaign has not been transparent with its finances, the obvious confluence of interest behind its ultimate goals and Beijing's ultimate goals for Taiwan, and given that several of its senior organizers have been traveling to China during the course of the campaign, there is a compelling case to be made.
And that case is that the real power behind the scenes is not Shih Ming-teh (
The PFP has stood beside these actions all the way, and no one in Taiwan should have any illusions about where Soong's sympathies lie. Just think back to last year, when he was greeted lovingly by the CCP during his tour of China.
So when members of the KMT act all surprised that their good old friend Soong and his pals would have the audacity to betray them all over again, one can only think: "What did you expect? You're dealing with a snake-oil salesman who has undermined his country's security and democratic development."
Whatever the KMT wants for Taiwan, it is difficult to see how placing further trust in Soong will achieve those goals. His party is composed of a bunch of extremists and lacks real clout.
The time has come for the KMT to marginalize the PFP, cut it off, then watch it die.
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its
RSS